东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 523-527.DOI: -

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

身份犯的本质及其类型化问题研究

王军明   

  1. (吉林大学法学院，吉林长春130012)
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-25 修回日期:2013-12-25 出版日期:2014-09-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 王军明
  • 作者简介:王军明(1979-)，男，辽宁大连人，吉林大学讲师，法学博士，主要从事中国刑法学研究。①参见日本《刑法典》第217条、218条的规定。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林大学博士启动基金资助项目(2012BS012).

Research on the Essence and Classification of Status Crime

WANG Jun-ming   

  1. (Law School， Jilin University， Changchun 130012， China)
  • Received:2013-12-25 Revised:2013-12-25 Online:2014-09-25 Published:2015-11-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

821

摘要： 由于法益侵害说对于中国刑法及刑事法治的建设更具有现实意义，因而必须确立犯罪是对法益的侵害或者威胁的基本观念，身份犯的本质也应解释为对法益的侵害。由于我国刑法并未明确规定身份犯，导致司法实践中在处理身份犯的案件存在一定难题。而类型化思维的提倡是解决问题的合理方式，即在思维方式上，倡导由概念思维转换到类型思维。同时，在刑法总则中明确身份犯的涵摄类型，增加“有关身份犯及其刑事责任”条款的类型性规定，进而指导刑法分则的具体适用，增强刑事立法的可操作性，实现刑事法治。

关键词: 身份犯, 犯罪本质, 刑事责任

Abstract: Since the theory of legal interest violation carries more practical significance to the construction of Chinas criminal law and criminal nomocracy， it is necessary that the basic concept that crime is a violation or threat of legal interests should be established and the essence of status crime should be interpreted as a violation of legal interests. Problems might arise from handling status crime in judicial practices in that Chinas criminal law does not specify status crime. A reasonable solution to such problems is introducing typological thinking， namely， the transformation from concept to classification. Meanwhile， it is suggested that the types of status crime in the general provisions of criminal law should be clarified and the typological regulations should be added to the provisions of status crime and its relevant criminal liabilities so as to guide the application of specific criminal law provisions， enhance the applicability of criminal legislation and eventually achieve the criminal nomocracy.

Key words: status crime, criminal essence, criminal liability

中图分类号: