东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 455-460.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.05.003

• 科技哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

兴起中的技术人类学

王皓   

  1. (东南大学人文学院,江苏南京211189)
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-28 修回日期:2015-02-28 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 王皓
  • 作者简介:王皓(1988-),男,湖北京山人,东南大学博士研究生,主要从事技术哲学与技术人类学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项资助项目(13BZX022)。

The Rising of Technological Anthropology

WANG Hao   

  1. (School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
  • Received:2015-02-28 Revised:2015-02-28 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-11-09
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 技术人类学可分为微观和宏观两种,微观技术人类学以物质文化研究为基础,宏观技术人类学则关注技术与社会的交互作用。技术人类学兴起的标志是莱蒙里尔和普法芬伯格对这两种理解进行总结,提出以社会技术系统为核心的技术人类学。传统人类学危机、科学与技术的区别、技术哲学经验转向和技术人类学的参与者视角是技术人类学得以兴起的四大原因。当前的技术人类学研究存在着学科建制不健全、研究范式不完善和个案研究不足三大问题。

关键词: 技术, 技术人类学, 社会技术系统

Abstract: Technological anthropology can be divided into microscopic anthropology and macroscopic anthropology. The former takes the studies of material culture as its basis while the latter is concerned with the interaction between technology and society. The rising sign of technological anthropology is that Pierre Lemonnier and Bryan Pfaffenberger summarized the two types of understanding, and put forward a new anthropology of technology by taking the social technology system as its core. The rising of technological anthropology can be attributed to the four factors—crises of traditional anthropology, differences between science and technology, empirical turning of technological philosophy, and participants perspectives of technological anthropology. As to the current research of technological anthropology, such problems do exist as incomplete discipline system, imperfect research paradigm and inadequate case studies.

Key words: technology, technological anthropology, sociotechnical system

中图分类号: