循证视角下政府工作人员使用学术成果的影响因素分析——基于多层线性模型

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.02.008

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 58-66.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.02.008

循证视角下政府工作人员使用学术成果的影响因素分析——基于多层线性模型

张兴，卓越

(厦门大学公共事务学院，福建厦门361005)

收稿日期:2019-09-30 修回日期:2019-09-30 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-04-02
通讯作者: 张兴
作者简介:张兴(1987-)，男，河北保定人，厦门大学博士研究生，主要从事政府绩效管理研究;卓越(1957-)，男，福建尤溪人，厦门大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事政府绩效管理研究。
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(17JZD059)。

An Analysis of Factors Affecting Government Staff's Use of Academic Research Results from an Evidence-based Perspective——Based on the Hierarchical Linear Model

ZHANG Xing， ZHUO Yue

(School of Public Affairs， Xiamen University， Xiamen 361005， China)

Received:2019-09-30 Revised:2019-09-30 Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-04-02
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 理论研究与实践应用脱节不仅涉及研究成果的科学严谨性与实践相关性，也与使用者自身的因素有关。循证主张谨慎地使用各种类型的证据进行管理和决策，为研究学术成果使用的影响因素提供了更宽广的视角。以49个政府单位为组织样本，运用多层线性模型检验组织和个体层面影响政府工作人员使用学术成果的因素。研究结果表明:个体的公共服务动机、循证能力以及组织规模、积极的组织环境对学术成果使用存在显著的正向效应;工作年限对学术成果使用存在负向效应;个体受教育程度和部门服务对象对学术成果使用的影响并不显著。

关键词: 循证, 证据, 学术成果, 政府工作人员

Abstract: The gap between theoretical research and practical application involves not only the scientific rigor and relevance of research results， but also the factors of users themselves. Evidence-based practice claims cautious use of various types of evidence for management and decision-making， and provides a broader perspective for studying the influencing factors of academic research results. In this paper， 49 government units are used as organizational samples， and a hierarchical linear model is used to test the factors at the organization level and individual level that influence the use of academic research results by government staff. The research results show that the public service motivation， evidence-based ability， organizational scale and positive organizational environment have a significant positive effect on the use of academic research results; the working years has a negative effect on the use of academic research results; and the impact of individual education and departmental service objects on the use of academic results is not significant.

Key words: evidence-based, evidence, academic research results;government staff

中图分类号:

D630.45

张兴，卓越. 循证视角下政府工作人员使用学术成果的影响因素分析——基于多层线性模型[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 58-66.

ZHANG Xing， ZHUO Yue. An Analysis of Factors Affecting Government Staff's Use of Academic Research Results from an Evidence-based Perspective——Based on the Hierarchical Linear Model[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(2): 58-66.

参考文献

[1]曹祖毅，谭力文，贾慧英. 脱节还是弥合?中国组织管理研究的严谨性、相关性与合法性——基于中文管理学期刊1979—2018年的经验证据［J］. 管理世界， 2018，34(10):208-229.
[2]陈振明. 中国公共管理学40年——创建一个中国特色世界一流的公共管理学科［J］. 国家行政学院学报， 2018(4):47-54.
[3]Rousseau D M. Is There Such a Thing as “Evidence-based Management”?［J］. Academy of Management Review， 2006，31(2):256-269.
[4]卓越，张兴. 预算绩效循证管理:概念诠释与实现路径［J］. 理论探讨， 2019(2):50-55.
[5]Estabrooks C A. Will Evidence-based Nursing Practice Make Practice Perfect?［J］. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive， 1999，30(4):273-294.
[6]Adib-Hajbaghery M. Factors Facilitating and Inhibiting Evidence-based Nursing in Iran［J］. Journal of Advanced Nursing， 2010，58(6):566-575.
[7]Viglione J. A Multi-level Examination of Organizational Context on Adult Probation Officer Attitudes Toward Evidence-based Practice［J］. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology， 2018，62(5):1331-1356.
[8]Moynihan D P，Ingraham P W. Integrative Leadership in the Public Sector: A Model of Performance-information Use［J］. Administration & Society， 2004，36(4):427-453.
[9]Askim J. The Demand Side of Performance Measurement: Explaining Councillors' Utilization of Performance Information in Policymaking［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2009，12(1):24-47.
[10]Johnson J D，Donohue W A，Atkin C K，et al. A Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking: Tests Focusing on a Technical Organization［J］. Science Communication， 1995，16(3):274-303.
[11]Dalheim A，Harthug S，Nilsen R M，et al. Factors Influencing the Development of Evidence-based Practice Among Nurses: A Self-report Survey［J］. BMC Health Services Research， 2012，12(1):367-367.
[12]Taylor J. Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Information for Decision Making in Australian State Agencies［J］. Public Administration， 2011，89(4):1316-1334.
[13]Moynihan D P，Pandey S K，Wright B E. Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use［J］. Governance， 2012，25(3):463-483.
[14]Kroll A，Vogel D. The PSM-leadership Fit: A Model of Performance Information Use［J］. Public Administration， 2014，92(4):974-991.
[15]李小华，董军. 公务员公共服务动机对个体绩效的影响研究［J］. 公共行政评论， 2012，5(1):105-121.
[16]Pandey S K，Wright B E，Moynihan D P. Public Service Motivation and Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2008，11(1):89-108.
[17]Gerrish K，Ashworth P，Lacey A，et al. Factors Influencing the Development of Evidence-based Practice: A Research Tool［J］. Journal of Advanced Nursing， 2007，57(3):328-338.
[18]Upton D，Upton P. Development of an Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire for Nurses［J］. Journal of Advanced Nursing， 2006，53(4):454-458.
[19]Chan S J. Organizational Goal Ambiguity and Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2014，24(4):955-981.
[20]Wright B E. The Role of Work Context in Work Motivation: A Public Sector Application of Goal and Social Cognitive Theories［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2004，14(1):59-78.
[21]Denhardt R B. The Pursuit of Significance: Strategies for Managerial Success in Public Organizations［M］. Cambridge:Wadsworth Publishing Company， 1993.(下转第73页)

循证视角下政府工作人员使用学术成果的影响因素分析——基于多层线性模型

An Analysis of Factors Affecting Government Staff's Use of Academic Research Results from an Evidence-based Perspective——Based on the Hierarchical Linear Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘洋，张斌. 行政执法证据与刑事证据衔接的理论基础[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(5): 518-525.
[2]	罗永平;王双;. 经济责任审计比较特征浅析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2006, 8(3): 201-204.
[3]	韩红丽. 缺乏刺激论;人类具有内在语言机制的有力论证[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2002, 4(3): 211-213.
[4]	赵凯;刘玲. 从一起行政案件看完善我国证据制度的必要性[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2000, 2(3): 175-177.