东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 139-144.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.02.017

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

从情感认知的视角看纳博科夫《洛丽塔》对二元对立的批判

管海佳   

  1. (浙江大学外国语言文化与国际交流学院，浙江杭州310058)
  • 修回日期:2021-02-13 接受日期:2021-02-13 发布日期:2022-05-18
  • 通讯作者: 管海佳
  • 作者简介:管海佳(1994-)，女，浙江台州人，浙江大学博士研究生，主要从事认知叙事学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学规划基金资助项目(L19BWW004)。

A Critique of Binary Opposition in Nabokov's Lolita from the Perspective of Emotional Cognition

GUAN Haijia   

  1. (School of International Studies， Zhejiang University， Hangzhou 310058， China)
  • Revised:2021-02-13 Accepted:2021-02-13 Published:2022-05-18
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

628

摘要： 已有研究多认为《洛丽塔》主人公亨伯特的悲剧性结局来自于理性的缺乏，然而，以理性为基础的二元对立认知才是他不容忽视的悲剧成因。亨伯特以二元对立的方式认知自我，造成精神疾病与自我认知的分裂;以二元对立的方式认知世界，忽略对立范畴间的模糊性，不仅造成巨大的认知错位，还会摧毁被认知的对象。事实上，情感认知的巨大价值短暂弥补了亨伯特纯粹理性认知的局限性，也展现了小说在叙事层面的艺术价值。

关键词: 《洛丽塔》; 纳博科夫; 二元对立; 情感认知

Abstract: Most previous studies on Lolita attribute Humbert's tragic ending to his lack of reason. However， his binary opposition， deemed as a representation of reason， is the leading cause of his tragic ending that cannot be underestimated. Humbert's binary knowledge of himself has led to his psychological disorder and conflicting self-recognition. His binary knowledge of the world， which does not cover the grey zone of different categories， not only gives birth to the cognitive biases but also undermines the objects being evaluated. In fact， emotional cognition compensates for the limitations of rigid reason and represents the narrative artistry of the novel.

Key words: Lolita; Vladimir Nabokov; binary opposition; emotional cognition

中图分类号: