Research of Industrial Generic Technology Innovation Based on Triple Helix

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.02.002

Abstract

Abstract: Industrial generic technology is a kind of special knowledge located in the “New Pasteur's Quadrant”， whose innovation shows the subject's characteristics of reflexivity， organizational integration， and nonlinearity of the process. Industrial generic technology innovation can be divided into three stages， namely， industrial generic technology identification， industrial generic technology research and development， and industrial generic technology application. The triple helix theory is applied to solve the “double unknownness” in the identification phase， “competition and cooperation contradictions” in the research and development stage， and “intellectual property conflicts” in the application phase. Moreover， the cooperation laws of each main body in the triple helix of different innovation stages and their respective functions are explored， and the triple helix motivation mechanism in the innovation process is constructed so as to resolve the predicaments of industrial generic technology innovation.

Key words: triple helix, industrial generic technology, technology innovation

CLC Number:

N031

WEI Chun-yan， LI Zhao-you. Research of Industrial Generic Technology Innovation Based on Triple Helix[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(2): 9-16.

References

[1]Layton E T.Technology as Knowledge［J］.Technology and Culture， 1974，10(6):31-41.
[2]Tassey G. The Functions of Technology Infrastructure in a Competitive Economy［J］. Research Policy ，1991，20(4):345-361.
[3]Tassey G. Technology Infrastructure and Competitive Position［M］. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers， 1992:59.
[4]Tassey G. Underinvestment in Public Good Technologies［J］. Journal of Technology Transfer， 2005，30(1/2):89-113.
[5]Tassey G. The Disaggregated Technology Function: A New Model of University and Corporate Research［J］. Research Policy， 2005，34(3):287-303.
[6]Stokes D E. Pasteu's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation［M］. Washington， D.C.:Brookings Institution， 1998:76-81.
[7]刘则渊，陈悦. 新巴斯德象限:高科技政策的新范式［J］. 管理学报， 2007，4(3):346-353.
[8]李兆友. 论技术创新过程［J］. 大连市委党校学报， 1999(5):13-15.
[9]詹·法格伯格，本·马丁，艾斯本·安德森. 创新研究:演化与未来［M］. 陈凯华，穆荣平，译. 北京:科学出版社， 2018:31.
[10]董铠军，杨茂喜. 浅析创新系统与创新生态系统［J］. 科研管理研究， 2018(14):1-9.
[11]Sabato J. EI Pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-tecnología-desarrollo-dependencia［M］. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Biblioteca Nacional， 2011.
[12]Gibbons M，Limoges C，Nowotony H，et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies［M］. London: Sage， 1994.
[13]Etzkowitz H，Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-based Economic Development［J］. EASST Review， 1995，14(1):11-19.
[14]Etzkowitz H，Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “ Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations［J］. Research Policy， 2000，29(2):109-123.
[15]Etzkowitz H，Viale R. Polyvalent Knowledge and the Entrepreneurial University: A Third Academic Revolution?［J］. Critical Sociology， 2010，36(4):595-609.
[16]周春彦，李海波，李星洲，等. 国内外三螺旋研究的理论前沿与实践探索［J］. 科学与管理， 2011(4):21-27.
[17]迈克尔·吉本斯，卡米耶·利摩日，黑尔佳·诺沃提尼，等. 知识生产的新模式: 当代社会科学与研究的动力学［M］. 陈洪捷，沈文钦，译. 北京: 北京大学出版社， 2011:131-135.
[18]项浙学，陈玉瑞. 论共性技术［J］. 浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版)， 2003，2(1):1-4.
[19]郑小碧. 基于自组织理论的产业集群共性技术创新研究［J］. 科技进步与对策， 2012，29(8):46-51.
[20]许鑫. 共性技术创新过程中的政府采购政策嵌入研究［D］. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学， 2015:61.
[21]江鸿，石云鸣. 共性技术创新的关键障碍及其应对——基于创新链的分析框架［J］. 经济与管理研究， 2019，40(5):74-84.
[22]韩元建，陈强. 政府支持产业共性技术研发的遴选流程和组织架构设计［J］. 中国科技论坛， 2015(10):15-21.
[23]Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Clusters: Boundary Permeability at University-Industry-Government Interfaces as a Regional Innovation Strategy［J］. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy， 2012，30(5):766-779.
[24]亨利·埃茨科维兹. 国家创新模式——大学、产业、政府“三螺旋”创新战略［M］. 周春彦，译. 北京:东方出版社， 2014:4-5.
[25]乔治·泰奇. 研究与开发政策的经济学［M］. 苏竣，柏杰，译. 北京:清华大学出版社， 2002:68-69.
[26]Zhang Mingli，Song Xiaozhong. Division of Labor， Transaction， and Generic Technology Supply of Industrial Cluster［C］∥2009 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (16th). Moscow: IEEE， 2009:1747-1753.
[27]周杰，张卫国，韩炜. 国外关于企业间竞合关系研究的述评及展望［J］. 研究与发展管理， 2017，29(6):144-158.
[28]刘宇，康健，邵云飞. 产业共性技术协同创新的三螺旋演进与动力研究——以成德绵生物医药产业的比较为例［J］. 中国科技论坛， 2017(12):83-90.
[29]Etzkowitz H，Zhou Chunyan. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship［M］. New York: Routledge， 2018.
[30]Zhou Chunyan. Four Dimensions to Observe a Triple Helix: Invention of “Cored Model” and Differentiation of Institutional and Functional Spheres［EB/OL］. (2014-11-01)［2019-09-20］. http:∥link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40604-014-0011-0.［31］Champenoisa C，Etzkowitz H. From Boundary Line to Boundary Space: The Creation of Hybrid Organizations as a Triple Helix Micro-foundation［J］. Technovation， 2018，76/77:28-39.［32］林晓言，张爱萍，郝亚平. 中国高铁技术创新三螺旋理论研究［J］. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)， 2017，16(2):22-33.［33］马莹，甄志宏. 中国高铁技术创新中的合作与竞争:一个新制度主义视角［J］. 上海对外经贸大学学报， 2017，24(4):73-80.