Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 198-204.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.02.015
• Marxism Theory • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Shun, HU Han-jin
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
About author:
Supported by:
Abstract: Although modernity is a theoretical field in which all schools of thought contend, the views of Marx and Giddens are among the most representative figures. Although Marx did not explicitly raise the concept of modernity, he always represented the fundamental direction of critique of modernity in that the intrinsic factor of modernitys paradox is what Marx continuously criticized—capital logic. It is true that ecological critique couldnt be a main task for Marx in his time, but he unintentionally revealed his own profound ecological thoughts in his critique of capital, instrumental rationality and alienated labor. In the twentieth century, Giddenss thoughts of modernity also developed in the context of capitalism, so they couldnt do without Marx; i.e., he subtly “inherited” Marx. It is of great benefit to interpret the two thinkers profound thoughts of ecological critique in the context of China, which may carry implications to Chinas ecological civilization construction.
Key words: Karl Marx, Anthony Giddens, modernity, capital logic, ecological dimension
CLC Number:
B089.1
LIU Shun, HU Han-jin. From Marx to Giddens: Ecological Dimension of Critique of ModernityDiscussion on Its Implications to Chinas Ecological Civilization Construction[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2015, 17(2): 198-204.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.02.015
http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/Y2015/V17/I2/198