Can Open Access to Resources Promote Ambidextrous Innovation?

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.01.004

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the sample of A-share listed companies in China's pharmaceutical and biological manufacturing industry during 2013-2017， from the perspective of corporate business transaction activities and financial transaction activities， the negative binomial regression model is used in the analysis of the relationship between the different open behaviors of enterprises and the ambidextrous innovation activities of the organization， as well as the moderating role of absorptive capacity. The empirical results show that enterprises adopting inbound open innovation can promote organizational exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation activities， while companies adopting outbound open innovation can inhibit organizational ambidextrous innovation. The absorptive capacity plays a positive role in regulating the impact of inbound and outbound open innovation access to resources on the process of organizational ambidextrous innovation.

Key words: technological innovation; open innovation; exploratory innovation; exploitative innovation; absorptive capacity

CLC Number:

F273

LIU Zhiying， ZHI Yuanyuan， WU Ruirui. Can Open Access to Resources Promote Ambidextrous Innovation?[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2021, 23(1): 24-33.

References

[1]March J G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning［J］. Organization Science， 1991，2(1):71-87.
[2]Raisch S，Birkinsshaw J. Organization Ambidexterity Antecedents， Outcomes， and Moderators［J］. Journal of Management， 2008，34(3):375-409.
[3]Bednarek R，Burke G，Jarzabkowski P，et al. Dynamic Client Portfolios as Source of Amebidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Client Relationship［J］. Long Range Planning， 2015，49(3):324-341.
[4]Chesbrough H W. Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology［M］. Boston: Harvard Business Press， 2006.
[5]Christensen J F，Olesen M H， Kjaer J S. The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation-evidence from the Transformation of Consumer Electronics［J］. Research Policy， 2005，34(10):1533-1549.
[6]Chesbrough H W，Crowther A K. Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries［J］. R&D Management， 2006，36(3):229-236.
[7]刘志迎，付丽华，马朝良，等. 基于Meta分析的创新二元性与企业绩效关系研宄［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理， 2017，38(6):171-180.
[8]刘志迎，路锋. 企业实施二元创新的有限资源动态配置机制研究［J］. 研究与发展管理， 2018，30(4):54-64.
[9]邹增明，刘明霞，邹思明. 冗余资源、CEO产出型职能经验对企业二元创新的影响［J］. 管理学报， 2019(8):1179-1187.
[10]Chiu Y C. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Supply Chain Portfolios［J］. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management， 2014，61(1):18-27.
[11]Chatterji A K，Fabruzio K R. Using Users: When Does External Knowledge Enhance Corporate Product Innovation?［J］. Strategic Management Journal， 2014，35(10):1427-1445.
[12]Dahlander L，Gann D M. How Open Is Innovation?［J］. Research Policy， 2010，39(6):699-709.
[13]Cassiman B，Valentini G. Open Innovation: Are Inbound and Outbound Knowledge Flows Really Complementary?［J］. Strategic Management Journal， 2016，37(6):1034-1046.
[14]Phelps C C. A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2009，53(4):890-913.
[15]Cohen W M，Levinthal D A. Absorptive Capacity: a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation［J］. Adiministrative Science Quarterly， 1990，35(1):128-152.
[16]钱锡红，杨永福，徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型［J］. 管理世界， 2010，26(5):118-129.
[17]李贞，杨洪涛. 吸收能力、关系学习及知识整合对企业创新绩效的影响研究——来自科技型中小企业的实证研究［J］. 科研管理， 2012，33(1):79-89.
[18]岳鹄，张宗益，朱怀念. 创新主体差异性、双元组织学习与开放式创新绩效［J］. 管理学报， 2018，15(1):48-56.
[19]Michelino I F，Lamberti E，Cammarano A，et al. Measuring Open Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry［J］. Creativity and Innovation Management， 2015，24(1):4-28.
[20]周章庆. 开放式创新策略与企业绩效的关系研究［D］. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学， 2018.
[21]赵子夜，杨庆，陈坚波. 通才还是专才: CEO的能力结构和公司创新［J］. 管理世界， 2018，34(2):123-143.