How Can Bureaucratic Organizations Respond to Complex Social Needs? Organizational Form Innovation in Co-construction， Co-governance and Sharing of G Province

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.05.008

Abstract

Abstract: In the context of the modernization and transformation of national governance， how governmental bureaucratic organizations respond to increasingly diverse and complex social needs has become an important topic related to national governance. As an important reform and innovation in response to complex social demands， “co-construction， co-governance and sharing” reflects the innovative logic of the current governmental bureaucracy oriented towards “society”， and helps to analyze the institutional support， constraints and internal mechanism that bureaucratic organizations may face when responding to complex social demands. It is found that， relying on the long-term historical model， the “integrated” bureaucratic organizations respond to the complex social needs effectively through the innovation of operation modes， but in practice the multiple substitution logic restricts the effectiveness of modern governance tasks. In order to match the social environment of the same period， the bureaucratic organizations develop a new organizational mechanism in the process of governance， namely， “interstitial organization”. As a unique new organizational form of bureaucratic organizations and social interaction， it is characterized by “discontinuous structure”， “autonomous division of labor” and “local operation”. It changes the typical characteristics of bureaucratic organizations， thus alleviating the vulnerability to the environment and playing an important role in the transformation of national governance.

Key words: interstitial bureaucracy; bureaucratic organization; social demand; national governance

CLC Number:

D638

SONG Kaiye. How Can Bureaucratic Organizations Respond to Complex Social Needs? Organizational Form Innovation in Co-construction， Co-governance and Sharing of G Province[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2022, 24(5): 57-66.

References

[1]吴毅，陈颀. 农地制度变革的路径、空间与界限——“赋权—限权”下行动互构的视角［J］. 社会学研究， 2015，30(5):36-62.
[2]陈天祥. 政府机构改革的价值逻辑——兼论大部制机构改革［J］. 中山大学学报(社会科学版)， 2012，52(2):148-155.
[3]周雪光. 黄仁宇悖论与帝国逻辑——以科举制为线索［J］. 社会， 2019，39(2):1-30.
[4]吕方，梅琳. “复杂政策”与国家治理——基于国家连片开发扶贫项目的讨论［J］. 社会学研究， 2017，32(3):144-168.
[5]李友梅，肖瑛，黄晓春. 当代中国社会建设的公共性困境及其超越［J］. 中国社会科学， 2012(4):125-139.
[6]宋锴业. 基层社会治理的“社会化困境”: 一项治理张力分析［J］. 公共管理与政策评论， 2020，9(6):56-72.
[7]Kohli A. State-directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2004.
[8]王汉生，吴莹. 基层社会中“看得见”与“看不见”的国家［J］. 社会学研究， 2011，25(1):63-95.
[9]贺东航，孔繁斌. 公共政策执行的中国经验［J］. 中国社会科学， 2011(5):61-79.
[10]周雪光. 基层政府间的“共谋现象”——一个政府行为的制度逻辑［J］. 社会学研究， 2008(6):1-21.
[11]O'Brien K，Li L. Selective Policy Implementation in Rural China［J］. Comparative Politics， 1999(2):167-186.
[12]Asatryan Z，Heinemann F，Pitlik H. Reforming the Public Administration: the Role of Crisis and the Power of Bureaucracy［J］. European Journal of Political Economy， 2017，48:128-143.
[13]蔡长昆. 制度环境、制度绩效与公共服务市场化: 一个分析框架［J］. 管理世界， 2016(4):52-69.
[14]史普原，李晨行. 派生型组织: 对中国国家与社会关系形态的组织分析［J］. 社会学研究， 2018，33(4):56-83.
[15]黄晓春. 中国社会组织成长条件的再思考——一个总体性理论视角［J］. 社会学研究， 2017，32(1):101-124.
[16]向静林，张翔. 创新型公共物品生产与组织形式选择——以温州民间借贷服务中心为例［J］. 社会学研究， 2014，29(5):47-72.
[17]盛智明. 地方政府部门如何规避风险?——以A市社区物业管理新政为例［J］. 社会学研究， 2017，32(5):166-191.
[18]谭海波，赵雪娇.“回应式创新”: 多重制度逻辑下的政府组织变迁［J］. 公共管理学报， 2016，13(4):16-29.
[19]Williamson E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms， Markets， Relational Contracting［M］. New York: Free Press， 1985:528-530.
[20]Milgrom H P. The Firm as an Incentive System［J］. American Economic Review， 1994，84(4):972-991.
[21]林雪霏. 当地方治理体制遇到协商民主——基于温岭“民主恳谈”制度的长时段演化研究［J］. 公共管理学报， 2017，14(1):14-26.
[22]Dommett K，Skelcher C. Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: a Strategic-relational Analysis of Agency Responses to Termination Threats［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2014，17(4):540-63.
[23]Bennis G. The Coming Death of Bureaucracy［J］. Management Review， 1967(3):19-24.
[24]彼得·布劳，马歇尔·梅耶. 现代社会中的科层制［M］. 马戎，时宪民，邱泽奇，译. 上海: 学林出版社， 2001:193.
[25]江小莉，王凌宇，许安心. 社区治理共同体的动力机制构建及路径——破解“奥尔森困境”的视角［J］. 东南学术， 2021(3):105-114.
[26]李迎生，李泉然，袁小平. 福利治理、政策执行与社会政策目标定位［J］. 社会学研究， 2017，32(6):44-69.
[27]史普原. 科层为体、项目为用: 一个中央项目运作的组织探讨［J］. 社会， 2015，35(5):25-59.
[28]McDonnell E. Patchwork Leviathan: How Pockets of Bureaucratic Governance Flourish Within Institutionally Diverse Developing States［J］. American Sociological Review， 2017(3):476-510.
[29]Day J D，Wendler J C. The New Economics of Organization［J］. The McKinsey Quarterly， 1998，28:739-777.(上接第21页)
[4]杨林，杨雅如. 股灾期间股指期货捆绑政策效果比较分析——基于2015 年股灾期间HS300高频数据实证［J］. 财经理论研究， 2019(1):42-51.
[5]Antoniou A，Koutmos G，Prescetto G. Testing for Long Memory in the Feedback Mechanism in the Futures Markets［J］. Review of Behavioral Finance， 2011，3:78-90.
[6]Hou Y， Steven L. The Impact of the CSI 300 Stock Index Futures: Positive Feedback Trading and Autocorrelation of Stock Returns［J］. International Review of Economics and Finance， 2014，33:319-337.
[7]Kung L M，Yu S W. Prediction of Index Futures Returns and the Analysis of Financial Spillovers: a Comparison Between GARCH and the Grey Theorem［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2008，186:1184-1200.
[8]Kumar S S S，Sampath A. What Drives the Off-shore Futures Market? Evidence from India and China［J］. Finance Research Letters， 2019，30:394-402.
[9]Booth G M，Chowdhury T M，Tse Y. Intraday Volatility in International Stock Index Futures Markets: Meteor Showers or Heat Waves?［J］. Management Science， 1997，43:1564-1576.
[10]Bilson C，Brailsford T， Evans T. The International Transmission of Arbitrage Informationacross Futures Markets［J］. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting， 2005，32(5):973-998.
[11]柴尚蕾，郭崇慧，苏木亚. 基于ICA模型的国际股指期货及股票市场对我国股市波动溢出［J］. 中国管理科学， 2011，19(3):11-18.
[12]Saranya K，Krishna P. Jump Interdependencies: Stochastic Linkages Among International Stock Markets［J］. North American Journal of Economics and Finance， 2021，57:2-16.
[13]Sentana E，Wadhwani S. Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations: Evidence from a Century of Daily Data［J］. Economic Journal， 1992，102:415-425.
[14]Renatas K，Panagiotis T，Michael D. From COVID-19 Herd Immunity to Investor Herding in International Stock Markets: the Role of Government and Regulatory Restrictions［J］. International Review of Financial Analysis， 2021，74:2-13.