Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 12-17.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.01.003
• Scientific and Technological Philosophy • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZENG Dan-feng, WU Guo-lin
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
About author:
Supported by:
Abstract: Dessauer holds different views of thing-in-itself from Kant and Engels, but there is a paradox in his ideas. Kant unknowable thing-in-itself contains the perceptual one and the ideal one, which have different relationships with empirical objects. Dessauer regards the thing-in-itself of nature objects (TII1) as Kants perceptual one and the thing-in-itself of artifacts (TII2) as Kants ideal one, thus separating TII1 and TII2 completely. TII2 hides itself in the technological ideas created by God, which can be materialized with human beingstechnological invention activities. Compared to scientific understanding activities, human beings broaden and experience the possible territories created by God with their technological invention activities. TII2 is known while TII1 is unknown. Based on the empirical facts, human beings construct TII2 based on TII1, and TII2 contains human beingspurposes or intentions, which is of identity with TII1 to some extent.
Key words: Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Dessauer, thing-in-itself, artifact, paradox
CLC Number:
N031
ZENG Dan-feng, WU Guo-lin. A New Understanding of Thing-in-Itself of ArtifactsReflection on Dessauers Views on Thing-in-Itself[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2016, 18(1): 12-17.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.01.003
http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/Y2016/V18/I1/12