Process， Model and Factors of Governance Innovation in Local Governments with the Development of Internet Technology ——Illustrated by the Governance of Online Car-hailing Service

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.01.010

Abstract

Abstract: The online car-hailing industry is a typical mode of “Internet +”， which develops from the traditional taxi industry with numerous and complex governmental regulations. Taking the governance of online car-hailing service as an example， the dynamic process of governance innovation of local governments can be probed into and the insight into the innovation manifestation and features of governance ideas， governance policy and governance mechanism can be obtained. The governance of online car-hailing service is a problem-oriented innovation model of governance for local governments and the development trend of the model is that the governance attitude of subjects is from passivity to activeness， the means of governance is from prohibition to promotion and the order of governance is from disorder to order. The development of the Internet defines the boundary and nature of the problem， which serves as the direct factor for local governments' governance innovation. The local governments possess quite strong autonomy and the willingness and capacity of the administrators decide the extent and quality of innovation. The intergovernmental relationship of strong center and weak localness is an important factor which affects the directions and ways of innovation.

Key words: Internet, local government, governance innovation, online car-hailing

CLC Number:

D630

LU Wen-ling， WEI Shu-yan. Process， Model and Factors of Governance Innovation in Local Governments with the Development of Internet Technology ——Illustrated by the Governance of Online Car-hailing Service[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2018, 20(1): 66-72.

References

[1]Putnam R D. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital［J］. Journal of Democracy， 1995，6(1):434.
[2]Zuurmond A. From Bureaucracy to Infocracy: Are Democratic Institutions Lagging Behind?［M］∥Snellen I T M. Public Administration in an Information Age. Amsterdam:IOS Press， 1998.
[3]潘祥辉. 新媒体的商业属性及其政治效应［J］. 文化纵横， 2014(3):100-106.
[4]恩格斯. 路德维希·费尔巴哈和德国古典哲学的终结［M］∥马克思，恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷). 北京:人民出版社， 2012:256.
[5]Mahoney J，Thelen K. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change［M］∥ Mahoney J， Thelen K. Explaining Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press， 2010:15-16.
[6]Thatcher M，Coen D. Reshaping European Regulatory Space: An Evolutionary Analysis［J］. West European Politics， 2008，31:806-836.
[7]Ackrill R，Kay A. Historical-insitutionalist Perspectives on the Development of the EU Budget System［J］. Journal of European Public Policy， 2006，13:113-133.
[8]王焕祥，黄美花. 中国地方政府创新的可持续性问题研究［J］. 上海行政学院学报， 2007，8(6):20.
[9]创业创新蓬勃兴起，新兴产业茁壮成长——党的十八大以来经济社会发展成就系列之四［EB/OL］. ［2017-07-17］. http:∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/201706/t20170626_1506952.html.
[10]Walker R M. Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension［J］. Public Management Review， 2014，16(1):21-44.
[11]Berry F S. Sizing Up State Policy Innovation Research［J］. Policy Studies Journal， 1994，22(3):442-456.
[12]吴建南，黄艳茹，马亮. 政府创新的稳定性研究——基于两届中国地方政府创新案例的比较［J］. 中国软科学， 2015，29(5):22-26.
[13]俞可平. 中美两国“政府创新”之比较——基于中国与美国“政府创新奖”的分析［J］. 学术月刊， 2012(3):5-15.
[14]陈雪莲，杨雪冬. 地方政府创新的驱动模式——地方政府干部视角的考察［J］. 公共管理学报， 2009，6(3):1-11.
[15]杨雪冬. 简论中国地方政府创新研究的十个问题［J］. 公共管理学报， 2008，5(1):16-26.
[16]中国互联网络信息中心. 中国互联网络信息中心国家信息化发展评价报告(2016)［EB/OL］. (2017-05-20)［2017-05-12］. http:∥www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201611/t20161118_56109.htm.