Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 7-15.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.01.002
• Scientific and Technological Philosophy • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Fei-xiang
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
About author:
Supported by:
-
Abstract:
Big data technology improves social operation's efficiency and enriches people’s daily life， but it also brings the problem of price discrimination in the process of development. It not only infringes the legitimate rights and interests of users， but also affects people's trust in this advanced technology， which maybe due to the imperfection of technology development， the excessive pursuit of capitals， the absence of ethical norms and principles， the complexity and inadequacy of supervision and the users' negligence as well as difficulty of protecting their own legitimate rights. Therefore， such perspectives of data itself， Internet platforms and users can be taken to reexamine the hidden ethical reflections of big data technology， mainly involving several key points-the ownership and distribution of data， the ethical rules that algorithms should follow， the reasonable definition of subjects of responsibility， the maintenance of the trust mechanism of relevant platforms， and the awakening of users' awareness of “data rights”. Only by doing so can big data technology be better understood and applied， and the whole society is likely to make continuous progress towards the concept of “Tech for Social Good” in the application and restriction of data.
Key words: big data price discrimination, data ownership, ethics of algorithm, Internet platform, privacy ethics, multi-player game
CLC Number:
N031
LI Fei-xiang. Ethical Reflections， Governance and Implications Under the Background of Big Data Price Discrimination[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(1): 7-15.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.01.002
http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/Y2020/V22/I1/7
[1]黄欣荣. 大数据技术的伦理反思［J］. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2015，36(3):46. [2]岳缙. 大数据技术的道德意义与伦理挑战［J］. 马克思主义与现实， 2016(5):91. [3]黄欣荣. 大数据时代的思维变革［J］. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版)， 2014，28(5):13-18. [4]维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格，肯尼思·库克耶. 大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革［M］. 盛杨燕，周涛，译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社， 2014:71-72. [5]刘智慧，张泉灵. 大数据技术研究综述［M］. 浙江大学学报(工学版)， 2014，48(6):957-972. [6]朱杰. 网络大数据环境下价格歧视行为研究［J］. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报， 2018(2):65. [7]郭胜. 大数据技术的伦理问题反思［J］. 科技传播， 2018(10):5. [8]唐凯麟. 大数据隐私伦理问题研究［J］. 伦理学研究， 2016(6):102-106. [9]Kitchin R. Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms［J］. Information & Society， 2017，20(1):14-29. [10]Rainie L，Anderson J. Code-dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age［R］. Washington， D.C.: Pew Research Center， 2017. [11]刘培，池忠军. 算法的伦理问题及其解决进路［J］. 东北大学学报(社会科学版)， 2019，21(2):119. [12]郭林生. 论算法伦理［J］. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)， 2018，32(2):42-43. [13]岳天明. 社会困局与个体焦虑:吉登斯的现代性思想［J］. 西北师大学报(社会科学版)， 2013，50(5):99. [14]谢志远，王明高. 论诚信伦理构建的制度保障与创新［J］. 伦理学研究， 2016(6):60. [15]刘守旗. 网络德育:21世纪的德育革命［J］. 南京师大学报(社会科学版)， 2003(6):70. [16]崔斌. 论网络诚信的伦理本质及其建设方略［J］. 道德与文明， 2016(2):130. [17]Rossler B. The Value of Privacy［M］.tran. Glasgow R D V. Cambridge: Polity Press， 2005:6-10. [18]马克·波斯特. 第二媒介时代［M］. 范静晔，译. 南京: 南京大学出版社， 2001:98. [19]薛桂波，赵一秀. 基于“负责任创新”的欧盟科技政策转型及启示［J］. 中国科技论坛， 2017(4):172-173.
