Paradigm Transformation of Realizing Contemporary Technological Ethics

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.02.001

Abstract

Abstract: The paradigm of realizing technological ethics is an important issue in the field of contemporary philosophy of technology. According to the basic categories of technological ethics， the realization of technological ethics means the implementation of the ought-to-be relationship between human and technology in practice， as well as the realization of the ethical potential of agents in action. Thus， the paradigm transformation of realizing technological ethics can be anchored as follows: the ethical purpose has shifted from defending the boundary between human beings and technologies to pursuing the authentic coexistence of human beings and technologies， the ethical agents have changed from humans with absolute autonomy to human-technology hybrids， and the mechanism has turned from the external ethical stipulation to the inter-embedded accomplishment of ethics and technologies. The value orientation behind the paradigm transformation includes the recovery of practical interest of technological ethics， post-humanist perspectives and ethical norms based on responsibility.

Key words: realization of technological ethics; paradigm transformation; authentic coexistence; hybrid agent; ethical accompaniment

CLC Number:

N031

JIA Lumeng， CHEN Fan. Paradigm Transformation of Realizing Contemporary Technological Ethics[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2021, 23(2): 1-7.

References

[1]van de Poel I，Verbeek P. Ethics and Engineering Design［J］. Science， Technology and Human Values， 2006，31(3):223-236.
[2]van den Eede Y. In Between Us: on the Transparency and Opacity of Technological Mediation［J］. Foundations of Science， 2011，16(2/3):139-159.
[3]朱勤. 技术中介理论: 一种现象学的技术伦理学思路［J］. 科学技术哲学研究， 2010，27(1):101-106.
[4]阿明·格伦瓦尔德. 技术伦理学手册［M］. 吴宁，译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社， 2017:8.
[5]Verbeek P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things［M］. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press， 2011:51.
[6]马丁·海德格尔. 存在与时间［M］. 陈嘉映，王庆节，译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 2016.
[7]马小虎. 海德格尔与亚里士多德的共在论比较［J］. 道德与文明， 2018(2):56.
[8]赵敦华. 现代西方哲学新编［M］. 北京: 北京大学出版社， 2010:123.
[9]芦文龙. 技术人工物作为道德行动体: 可能性、存在状态及伦理意涵［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2016，32(8):48.
[10]Latour B，Veen C. Morality and Technology: the End of the Means［J］. Theory， Culture and Society， 2002，19(5/6):247-260.
[11]van den Eede Y，Goeminne G，van den Bossche M. The Art of Living with Technology: Turning Over Philosophy of Technology's Empirical Turn［J］. Foundations of Science， 2017，22(2):235-246.
[12]胡比希 C. 技术伦理需要机制化［J］. 王国豫，译. 世界哲学， 2005(4):80.
[13]Verbeek P. Ambient Intelligence and Persuasive Technology: the Blurring Boundaries Between Human and Technology［J］. Nanoethics， 2009(3):231-242.
[14]Coeckelbergh M. Robot Rights? Towards a Social-relational Justification of Moral Consideration［J］. Ethics and Information Technology， 2010，12(3):214.
[15]贾璐萌，陈凡. 技术调解下道德主体的重构探究［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2018，34(6):41.
[16]Latour B. Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts［M］∥Bijker W E，Law J. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press， 1992:225-258.
[17]Wallach W，Allen C. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong［M］. New York: Oxford University Press， 2009:173.
[18]Brey P. Philosophy of Technology After the Empirical Turn［J］. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology， 2010，14(1):36-48.
[19]张卫，王前. 论技术伦理学的内在研究进路［J］. 科学技术哲学研究， 2012，29(3):47.
[20]Thero D P. Understanding Moral Weakness［M］. Amsterdam: Rodopi， 2006.
[21]Verbeek P. Technology Design as Experimental Ethics［M］∥van der Burg S， Swierstra T. Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. London: Palgrave Macmillan， 2013:79-96.
[22]菲利普·布瑞. 技术哲学: 从反思走向建构［J］. 王楠，朱雅婷，译. 工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程， 2014，6(2):129-133.
[23]胡明艳. 纳米技术发展的伦理参与研究［M］. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社， 2015.
[24]Verbeek P. The Irony of Humanism: on the Complexities of Discussing the Moral Significance of Things［J］. Philosophy and Technology， 2012，25:626-631.