Research on the Counter-cyclical Path of Moral Governance of Emerging Technologies in the Post-epidemic Era

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.04.001

Abstract

Abstract: In view of the firm belief in developing emerging technologies and their moral hazards， counter-cyclical prudent management in moral governance is conducive to addressing systemic risks， maintaining the stability and development of emerging technologies， and enhancing the commensurability of ethical governance of science and technology. Based on the connotation and structure of uncertainty， the pro-cyclical characteristics of the moral hazards of emerging technologies are discussed and the discontinuous balance between the uncertainty and the moral hazards of emerging technologies is confirmed. Considering the dimensions and the factors influencing the counter-cyclical moral governance， and based on the rational and irrational characteristics of technological subjects， the moral adaptation path and moral emotion path of counter-cyclical regulation are put forward.

Key words: emerging technology; moral governance; social integration; counter-cyclical regulation

CLC Number:

N031

FAN Yiqiang， LI Xia. Research on the Counter-cyclical Path of Moral Governance of Emerging Technologies in the Post-epidemic Era[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2021, 23(4): 1-6.

References

[1]Maslow A H. A Theory of Human Motivation［J］. Psychological Review， 1943，50(4):379.
[2]Knight F. Risk， Uncertainty and Profit［M］. Boston: The Riverside Press， 1921:20.
[3]Heisenberg W. Uber Den Anschaulichen Inhalt Der Quantentheo-retischen Kinematik Und Mechanik［J］. Zeitschrift fur Physik， 1927，43:189.
[4]Walker W，Harremos P，Rotmans J，et al. Defining Uncertainty: a Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-based Decision Support［J］. Integrated Assessment， 2003，4(1):13-14.
[5]Koppenjan J，Klijn E. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making［M］. New York: Routledge， 2004:6.
[6]张彦. 价值排序与伦理风险［M］. 北京: 人民出版社， 2011:16.
[7]Huda M. Empowering Application Strategy in the Technology Adoption［J］. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management， 2019，10(1):173-188.
[8]陈瑜，丁堃. 新兴技术价值前置型治理——应对新兴技术不确定性的新路径［J］. 自然辩证法通讯， 2018，40(5):103-110.
[9]范毅强. 区块链技术的风险与伦理规约的路径研究［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2019，35(2):53-57.
[10]Cummings L. Reasoning Under Uncertainty: the Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry［J］. Informal Logic， 2002，22(2):122.
[11]休谟. 人性论［M］. 关文运，译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 1996:508.
[12]Kumar A，Fischer C，Tople S，et al. A Traceability Analysis of Monero's Blockchain［C］∥European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Cham: Springer， 2017:14.
[13]Bonneau J. Why Buy When You Can Rent?［C］∥Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Berlin: Springer， 2016:19-26.
[14]Eyal I，Sirer E G. Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable［J］. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security， 2014，8437:436-454.
[15]李建华. 道德适应: 新型伦理共同体的生成路径［J］. 社会科学战线， 2020(7):10.
[16]范毅强. 新兴技术伦理信任的路径研究——以区块链技术的发展为例［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2020，36(4):37-43.
[17]Macnaghten P，Chilvers J. The Future of Science Governance: Publics， Policies， Practices［J］. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy， 2014，32(3):530-548．
[18]西宝，陈瑜，姜照华. 技术协同治理框架与机制——基于“价值—结构—过程—关系”视角［J］. 科学学研究， 2016，34(11):1615-1624.
[19]李建华，刘刚. 论道德适应的衍化逻辑［J］. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版)， 2018，39(1):4.
[20]Goldfeder S，Kalodner H，Reisman D. When the Cookie Meets the Blockchain: Privacy Risks of Web Payments Via Cryptocurrencies［J］. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies， 2018(4):179-199.
[21]刘易斯. 情绪心理学［M］. 南莎，译. 北京: 电子工业出版社， 2017:362.
[22]范毅强，李侠. 实验哲学视域中的认知非渗透研究［J］. 科学技术哲学研究， 2020，37(5):9-14.
[23]占斌，杜碧煊，陈绍华，等. 道德判断影响大脑对公平行为的早期评价［J］. 科学通报， 2020，65(19):1985-1965.
[24]Krettenauer T，Campbell S，Hertz S. Moral Emotions and the Development of the Moral Self in Childhood［J］.European Journal of Developmental Psychology， 2013，10(2):159-173.