客舱托盘桌高度对乘客头颈姿态和不适水平的影响

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.09.014

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1313-1322.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.09.014

客舱托盘桌高度对乘客头颈姿态和不适水平的影响

王龙，余隋怀，陈登凯，初建杰

(西北工业大学工业设计与人机工效工业和信息化部重点实验室，陕西西安710072)

修回日期:2020-11-19 接受日期:2020-11-19 发布日期:2021-09-16
通讯作者: 王龙
作者简介:王龙(1988-)，男，山东淄博人，西北工业大学博士研究生；余隋怀(1962-)，男，吉林通化人，西北工业大学教授，博士生导师；陈登凯(1975-)，男，陕西西安人，西北工业大学教授，博士生导师．
基金资助:
工业与信息化部民用飞机专项基金资助项目(MJ-2015-F-018)；教育部高等学校学科创新引智计划项目(B13044).

Effect of Cabin Tray Table Height on Passengers’ Head and Neck Posture and Perceived Level of Discomfort

WANG Long， YU Sui-huai， CHEN Deng-kai， CHU Jian-jie

Key Laboratory of Industrial Design and Ergonomics Ministry of Industry and Information Technology， Northwestern Polytechnical University， Xi’an 710072， China.

Revised:2020-11-19 Accepted:2020-11-19 Published:2021-09-16
Contact: YU Sui-huai
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高飞机客舱乘坐空间的舒适性，针对头颈姿态角难以直接采集的问题，提出利用三维扫描间接得到测量数据的方法.通过与问卷调查及感知不适水平(perceived level of discomfort， PLD)测试相结合，发现多数乘客会因托盘桌偏矮感到不舒适;使用原始高度(68cm)的托盘桌时，被试者的头颈姿态角均在中性区域之外，头颈姿态过度屈曲;托盘桌逐级(73—78—83cm)升高进行重复实验，被试者的头倾角和颈曲角显著减小并接近或降至中性区域;PLD测试数据整体随托盘桌升高先降低后回升.结果表明托盘桌高度设置在73~83cm范围内可以显著减小乘客头颈屈曲幅度，减少乘客头颈部的不适感.

关键词: 舒适性;三维扫描;PLD测试;托盘桌;头颈姿态角

Abstract: To improve the comfort of the cabin space in aircraft， focusing on the difficulty to directly collect anthropometric data of head/neck posture angle， a method is proposed in this paper to obtain the head/neck posture angle indirectly by 3D scanning. A 3D scanning and a perceived level of discomfort(PLD)test are combined with a questionnaire， the results of which show that most passengers think that the current tray table is too low and uncomfortable. When tested with original height(68cm)tray table， the subjects’ head/neck posture angles are all outside the neutral region， indicating that the head/neck posture is excessive flexion. After tray table is raised gradually(73-78-83cm)and the same tests are repeated， the subjects’ HFA and NFA decreased significantly. The HFA and NFA are closer to or reach the neutral range. In PLD tests， with the rise of the tray table， the data first decreases and then rises. It shows that adjusting the tray table in 73~83cm can significantly improve the passengers’ head/neck posture and reduce the discomfort of passengers’ neck.

Key words: comfort; 3D scanning; PLD test; tray table; head/neck posture angle

中图分类号:

TB47

王龙，余隋怀，陈登凯，初建杰. 客舱托盘桌高度对乘客头颈姿态和不适水平的影响[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(9): 1313-1322.

WANG Long， YU Sui-huai， CHEN Deng-kai， CHU Jian-jie. Effect of Cabin Tray Table Height on Passengers’ Head and Neck Posture and Perceived Level of Discomfort[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(9): 1313-1322.

参考文献

[1]Vink P.Aircraft interior comfort and design［M］.Netherlands:Delft University of Technology，CRC Press，2011:29-40.
[2]Vendel M，Dangal S，Coppens J，et al.Effects of a hand luggage guiding system on airplane boarding time and passenger experience ［J］.International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace，2019，6(3):1-25.
[3]Franz M，Durt A，Zenk R，et al.Comfort effects of a new car headrest with neck support ［J］.Applied Ergonomics，2012，43(2):336-343.
[4]Villanueva M，Jonai H，Sotoyama M，et al.Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal ［J］.Industrial Health，1997，35(3):330-336.
[5]Young J G，Trudeau M，Oedll D，et al.Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles ［J］.Work，2012，41(1):81-91.
[6]钟媛.民航座椅结构优化及造型设计研究［D］.沈阳:沈阳航空航天大学，2015.(Zhong Yuan.Research on structural optimization and modeling design of civil aviation seats ［D］.Shenyang:Shenyang Aerospace University，2015.)
[7]陈祥.高速铁路客车乘坐舒适度综合评价模型研究［D］.成都:西南交通大学，2010.(Chen Xiang.Study on comprehensive evaluation model of passenger comfort of high-speed railway passenger cars ［D］.Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University，2010.)
[8]Xie Y，Szeto G，Dai J.Prevalence and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints among users of mobile handheld devices:a systematic review ［J］. Applied Ergonomics，2017，59:132-142.
[9]Syamala K，Ailneni R，Kin J，et al.Armrests and back support reduced biomechanical loading in the neck and upper extremities during mobile phone use ［J］.Applied Ergonomics，2018，73:48-54.
[10]Straker L，Burgess-Limerick R，Pollock C，et al.The influence of desk and display design on posture and muscle activity variability whilst performing information technology tasks ［J］.Applied Ergonomics，2009，40(5):852-859.
[11]宋超，李宏汀，王春慧，等.久坐对脊椎肌肉sEMG信号的影响［J］.浙江大学学报(理学版)，2016，43(6):746-750.(Song Chao，Li Hong-ting，Wang Chun-hui，et al.Effect of sedentary on sEMG signal of spinal muscles ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)，2016，43(6):746-750.)
[12]Harms-Ringdahl K，Ekholm J.Intensity and character of pain and muscular activity levels elicited by maintained extreme flexion position of the lower-cervical-upper-thoracic spine ［J］.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine，1986，18(3):117-126.
[13]Naddeo A，Califano R，Vink P.The effect of posture，pressure and load distribution on (dis)comfort perceived by students seated on school chairs ［J］.International Journal on Interactive Design & Manufacturing，2018，12(4):1179-1188.
[14]Vasavada A，Nevins D，Monda S，et al.Gravitational demand on the neck musculature during tablet computer use ［J］.Ergonomics，2015，58(6):990-1004.
[15]Pei H，Yu S，Babski R K，et al.Quantification of lower extremity physical exposures in various combinations of sit/stand time duration associated with sit-stand workstation ［J］.Medycyna Pracy，2017，68(3):315-327.
[16]裴卉宁，余隋怀，李文华，等.主观感知不适量表在久坐作业中的应用［J］.航天医学与医学工程，2017，30(3):170-175.(Pei Hui-ning，Yu Sui-huai，Li Wen-hua，et al.Application of subjective perception inappropriate scale in sedentary work ［J］.Aerospace Medicine and Medical Engineering，2017，30(3):170-175.)
[17]Veen S V，Vink P.Can prior experience influence seating comfort ratings? ［J］.Ergonomics in Design the Quarterly of Human Factors Applications，2016，24(2):16-20.
[18]Ahmadpour N，Robert J M，Lindgaard G.Aircraft passenger comfort experience:underlying factors and differentiation from discomfort ［J］. Applied Ergonomics，2016，52:301-308.
[19]Ahmadpour N，Lindgaard G，Robert J M，et al.The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin ［J］.Ergonomics，2014，57(6):801-815.
[20]Lu J，Yu S，Chu J，et al.Identifying and analyzing critical factors impacting on passenger comfort employing a hybrid model ［J］.Human Factors & Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries，2017，27(6):1-17.
[21]Lewis L，Patel H，D’Cruz M，et al.What makes a space invader? Passenger perceptions of personal space invasion in aircraft travel ［J］.Ergonomics，2017，60(11):1-28.
[22]苗俊霞，周为民.民用航空安全与管理［M］.北京:清华大学出版社，2015.(Miao Jun-xia，Zhou Wei-min.Civil aviation safety and management ［M］.Beijing:Tsinghua University Press，2015.)
[23]Miller E L，Lapp S M，Parkinson M B.The effects of seat width，load factor，and passenger demographics on airline passenger accommodation ［J］.Ergonomics，2019，62(2):330-341.
[24]Johnson G.The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae ［J］.Spine，1998，23(8):921-927.
[25]Babski R K，Stanfield J，Hughes L.Assessment of video display workstation set up on risk factors associated with the development of low back and neck discomfort ［J］.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，2005，35(7):593-604.
[26]Grant C A，Johnston M，Adam C J，et al.Accuracy of 3D surface scanners for clinical torso and spinal deformity assessment ［J］.Medical Engineering & Physics，2019，63:63-71.
[27]Dessery Y，Pallari J.Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace ［J］.Plos One，2018，13(4):34-46.
[28]成岳.工程试验设计方法［M］.2版.武汉:武汉理工大学出版社，2010.(Cheng Yue.Engineering experiment design method［M］.2nd ed.Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology Press，2010.)
[29]Borg G A.Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion ［J］.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise，1982，14(5):377-381.
[30]Schulze L J H，Woods C G.Effectiveness of workplace accommodations for a corporate telephone operator with a full left-arm prosthesis:a case study ［J］.Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation，1994，4(2):77-86.［31］Horton S J，Johnson G M，Skinner M A.Changes in head and neck posture using an office chair with and without lumbar roll support ［J］.Spine，2010，35(12):E542-E548.［32］Rsine S，Twomey L T.Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men ［J］.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation，1997，78(11):1215-1223.［33］Szeto G P Y，Straker L，Raine S.A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers ［J］.Applied Ergonomics，2002，33(1):75-84.［34］Sommerich C M，Joines S，Psihogios P.Effects of computer monitor viewing angle and related factors on strain，performance，and preference outcomes ［J］.Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society，2001，43(1):39-55.［35］Chachris E A，Sirinya V，Lucy R.Musculoskeletal disorder and pain associated with smartphone use:a systematic review of biomechanical evidence ［J］.Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal，2018，38:1-14.

客舱托盘桌高度对乘客头颈姿态和不适水平的影响

Effect of Cabin Tray Table Height on Passengers’ Head and Neck Posture and Perceived Level of Discomfort

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	林秀丽，曹亚平，夏祉君，柳静献. 轴流旋风分离器特性的数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(9): 1360-1364.
[2]	王海英，李亚宁，周畅，王琳. 反义标识的认知实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(7): 1056-1060.
[3]	胡名彩，郭伏，叶国全. 基于改进变精度贝叶斯粗糙集的感性知识获取[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(12): 1794-1799.
[4]	花福安，侯帅，李建平. 锌液倒角对垂直电磁封流过程中电磁力的影响[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(6): 808-812.
[5]	林秀丽，曹亚平，董思敬，柳静献. 机车用折角式过滤器特性的数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(3): 436-440.
[6]	金海哲，陈瀚，周玉林，刘玮琳. 基于顾客偏好的瓶装水外观感性质量评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 38(2): 295-299.
[7]	操雅琴，郭伏，屈庆星. 基于多模式测量的网站用户行为意图预测模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(11): 1669-1672.
[8]	牛东方，谢里阳，杨松，吕春梅. 基于特征分析的机电产品交互界面评价模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(6): 846-849.
[9]	郭伏，于聪，丁一. 网页交互任务的用户情感测量方法[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(1): 131-134.
[10]	金涛，明成业，周淑芳，何家敏. 视觉搜索中图标布局的影响机理[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(11): 1579-1584.