东北大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 515-518.DOI: -

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

机器人角速度两种软测量方法的PD控制对比

王永富;柴天佑;岳恒   

  1. 东北大学自动化研究中心;东北大学自动化研究中心;东北大学自动化研究中心 辽宁沈阳 110004
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-24 修回日期:2013-06-24 出版日期:2004-06-15 发布日期:2013-06-24
  • 通讯作者: Wang, Y.-F.
  • 作者简介:-
  • 基金资助:
    国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2002AA412140);;

PD control comparison between two schemes of angular velocity estimation for robots

Wang, Yong-Fu (1); Chai, Tian-You (1); Yue, Heng (1)   

  1. (1) Res. Ctr. of Automat., Northeastern Univ., Shenyang 110004, China
  • Received:2013-06-24 Revised:2013-06-24 Online:2004-06-15 Published:2013-06-24
  • Contact: Wang, Y.-F.
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 对比分析了用LPP差分方法和高增益观测器方法估计机器人角速度的有效性,并用这两种角速度估计方法分别形成了机器人两种不同的PD输出反馈控制器·在机器人仿真实验中,对这两种方法产生的动态和稳态估计误差以及闭环系统的动态和稳态跟踪误差进行了对比分析·从这两种方法产生的估计误差及闭环系统跟踪误差的对比结果表明,当角位置测量精确度较高时,利用差分方法估计机器人角速度较理想,而较低时采用观测器方法估计机器人角速度较理想·

关键词: 机器人, PD控制, 高增益观测器, 数字差分, 角速度, 仿真

Abstract: Estimate of the joint angular velocity of robot is preferable with two methods, i.e. the most popular model-free high-gain observer and the simplest LPP numerical difference method. Two PD controllers based on high-gain observer and on LPP numerical difference are given differently. In robot simulation, the tracking error and estimated error of the scheme of high-gain observer-based PD control are shown and compared with those of the same PD controller using numerical difference method. The results show that if the encoder can give very accurate measurement for joint position, the performance of robot using LPP numerical difference method is better than that using high-gain observer and vice versa.

中图分类号: