Parameter Analysis and Verification of Variable F-RD-Type Lattice Structure

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2024.09.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the conventional F-RD-type lattice structure for deformation design， a TPMS parameter design method based on implicit expression is proposed to design the lattice structure by changing the deformation parameter inputted into the implicit expression； the influence law of the deformation parameter and the threshold value on the porosity of the F-RD-type lattice structure is investigated， the single parameter and mixed parameter methods for porosity analysis are proposed， the mapping relationship between the deformation parameter and the threshold value on the variable F-RD-type lattice structure is established， and the F-RD-type lattice structure with specific shapes and porosity can be generated； through the AlSi10Mg samples prepared by the metal laser sintering molding principle， the influence relationship of the deformation parameter and the threshold value on the actual porosity is verified， which provides a reference for the engineering design and application of TPMS lattice structures.

Key words: variable F-RD-type lattice structure, parametric analysis, TPMS, porosity, lattice structure design

CLC Number:

TH 122

Bo HAO, Peng ZHANG, Zhi-ming ZHU. Parameter Analysis and Verification of Variable F-RD-Type Lattice Structure[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2024, 45(9): 1294-1300.

Figures/Tables 11

References 10

1	Jin X， Li G X， Liu E C，et al.Lightweight design for servo frame based on lattice material［J］.IOP Conference Series：Materials Science and Engineering，2017，207：012035.
2	Alkebsi E A A， Ameddah H， Outtas T，et al.Design of graded lattice structures in turbine blades using topology optimization［J］.International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing，2021，34（4）：370-384.
3	Yang L， Yan C Z， Fan H Y，et al.Investigation on the orientation dependence of elastic response in Gyroid cellular structures［J］.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials，2019，90：73-85.
4	Al‑Ketan O， Rowshan R， Al‑Rub R K A.Topology‑mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut，skeletal，and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials［J］.Additive Manufacturing，2018，19：167-183.
5	Lu Y T， Zhao W Y， Cui Z T，et al.The anisotropic elastic behavior of the widely‑used triply‑periodic minimal surface based scaffolds［J］.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials，2019，99：56-65.
6	李祥，高芮宁，熊胤泽，等.基于TPMS结构的多孔钛制备与表征［J］.稀有金属材料与工程，2020，49（1）：325-330.
	Li Xiang， Gao Rui‑ning， Xiong Yin‑ze，et al.Fabrication and characterization of porous titanium based on TPMS structure［J］.Rare Metal Materials and Engineering，2020，49（1）：325-330.
7	石志良，高杰，王伟，等.钛合金变形Gyroid单元多孔结构设计与分析［J］.稀有金属材料与工程，2022，51（7）：2631-2636.
	Shi Zhi‑liang， Gao Jie， Wang Wei，et al.Design and analysis of porous structure of titanium alloy deformed Gyroid unit［J］.Rare Metal Materials and Engineering，2022，51（7）：2631-2636.
8	杜义贤，孙鹏飞，付君健，等.I-WP型极小曲面空心多孔结构设计与力学性能分析［J］.计算机集成制造系统，2022，28（9）：2739-2747.
	Du Yi‑xian， Sun Peng‑fei， Fu Jun‑jian，et al.Design and mechanical properties analysis of I-WP triply periodic minimal surfaces hollow cellular structure［J］.Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems，2022，28（9）：2739-2747.
9	Yoo D.Heterogeneous minimal surface porous scaffold design using the distance field and radial basis functions［J］.Medical Engineering & Physics，2012，34（5）：625-639.
10	Li D W， Liao W H， Dai N，et al.Comparison of mechanical properties and energy absorption of sheet‑based and strut‑based gyroid cellular structures with graded densities［J］.Materials，2019，12（13）：2183.

C=-0.4		C=-0.2		C=0		C=0.2		C=0.4
a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%
1.0	85.84	1.0	85.85	1.0	85.87	1.0	86.08	1.0	86.46
1.4	86.00	1.4	86.01	1.4	86.17	1.4	86.40	1.4	86.71
1.8	86.07	1.8	86.15	1.8	86.32	1.8	86.55	1.8	86.90
2.2	86.13	2.2	86.22	2.2	86.40	2.2	86.63	2.2	86.93
2.6	86.19	2.6	86.26	2.6	86.45	2.6	86.67	2.6	86.98
3.0	86.20	3.0	86.26	3.0	86.46	3.0	86.66	3.0	86.97
3.4	86.18	3.4	86.28	3.4	86.46	3.4	86.70	3.4	86.95
3.8	86.16	3.8	86.28	3.8	86.45	3.8	86.68	3.8	86.93
4.2	86.11	4.2	86.26	4.2	86.46	4.2	86.66	4.2	86.91
4.6	86.08	4.6	86.21	4.6	86.45	4.6	86.65	4.6	86.90
5.0	86.00	5.0	86.16	5.0	86.43	5.0	86.66	5.0	86.87

C=-0.4		C=-0.2		C=0		C=0.2		C=0.4
a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%	a	P/%
1.0	85.84	1.0	85.85	1.0	85.87	1.0	86.08	1.0	86.46
1.4	86.00	1.4	86.01	1.4	86.17	1.4	86.40	1.4	86.71
1.8	86.07	1.8	86.15	1.8	86.32	1.8	86.55	1.8	86.90
2.2	86.13	2.2	86.22	2.2	86.40	2.2	86.63	2.2	86.93
2.6	86.19	2.6	86.26	2.6	86.45	2.6	86.67	2.6	86.98
3.0	86.20	3.0	86.26	3.0	86.46	3.0	86.66	3.0	86.97
3.4	86.18	3.4	86.28	3.4	86.46	3.4	86.70	3.4	86.95
3.8	86.16	3.8	86.28	3.8	86.45	3.8	86.68	3.8	86.93
4.2	86.11	4.2	86.26	4.2	86.46	4.2	86.66	4.2	86.91
4.6	86.08	4.6	86.21	4.6	86.45	4.6	86.65	4.6	86.90
5.0	86.00	5.0	86.16	5.0	86.43	5.0	86.66	5.0	86.87

a=1.5，b=0.4		a=2.0，b=0.4		a=2.0，b=0.6		a=2.5，b=0.6
C	P/%	C	P/%	C	P/%）	C	P/%
-0.8	86.95	-0.8	86.39	-0.8	86.24	-0.8	86.04
-0.6	86.24	-0.6	86.04	-0.6	86.11	-0.6	86.01
-0.4	86.06	-0.4	85.94	-0.4	86.07	-0.4	86.04
-0.2	86.11	-0.2	86.03	-0.2	86.17	-0.2	86.13
0	86.44	0	86.43	0	86.46	0	86.41
0.2	87.10	0.2	87.04	0.2	86.86	0.2	86.81
0.4	88.34	0.4	88.07	0.4	87.52	0.4	87.34
0.6	89.59	0.6	89.13	0.6	88.46	0.6	88.27
0.8	90.45	0.8	89.86	0.8	89.45	0.8	89.12

a=1.5，b=0.4		a=2.0，b=0.4		a=2.0，b=0.6		a=2.5，b=0.6
C	P/%	C	P/%	C	P/%）	C	P/%
-0.8	86.95	-0.8	86.39	-0.8	86.24	-0.8	86.04
-0.6	86.24	-0.6	86.04	-0.6	86.11	-0.6	86.01
-0.4	86.06	-0.4	85.94	-0.4	86.07	-0.4	86.04
-0.2	86.11	-0.2	86.03	-0.2	86.17	-0.2	86.13
0	86.44	0	86.43	0	86.46	0	86.41
0.2	87.10	0.2	87.04	0.2	86.86	0.2	86.81
0.4	88.34	0.4	88.07	0.4	87.52	0.4	87.34
0.6	89.59	0.6	89.13	0.6	88.46	0.6	88.27
0.8	90.45	0.8	89.86	0.8	89.45	0.8	89.12

[1]	Jia-hao ZHAO, Yang QU, Hong-jie LUO, Shi-jie YANG. Effect of Sintering Process on Microstructure and Mechanical Property of Porous Ti [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2024, 45(6): 816-822.
[2]	LIAO Wei， XU Wei-wei. Parametric Analysis and Optimization Design of Cable Supported Scissor-Like Deployable Bridge [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2022, 43(11): 1623-1629.
[3]	CHEN Chong-feng， XU Tao， HEAP Michael,YANG Tian-hong. Modeling of the Influence of Pore Size and Porosity on Strength Characteristics of Volcanic Rock [J]. Journal of Northeastern University:Natural Science, 2017, 38(5): 725-729.
[4]	GAO Qiang-jian， WEI Guo， JIANG Xin， SHEN Feng-man. Effect of MgO on Compressive Strength of Reduced Iron Ore Pellet [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2016, 37(10): 1407-1410.
[5]	GAO Qiangjian， JIANG Xin， WEI Guo， SHEN Fengman. Characterization of Consolidation Degree of Iron Ore Pellet by Mercury Injection Method [J]. Journal of Northeastern University, 2013, 34(6): 832-835.
[6]	GAO Qiang-jian， WEI Guo， HE Yi-bo， SHEN Feng-man. Effect of MgO on Compressive Strength of Pellet [J]. Journal of Northeastern University:Natural Science, 2013, 34(1): 103-106.