Influence of “Government-Industry-University” Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.017

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the complex causal mechanism that affects the differences in entrepreneurial activity among regions， based on the triple helix theory， the configuration thinking and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method are used to integrate six conditional variables at three levels of government-industry-university. Results found that: any single element of government-industry-university does not constitute a necessary condition for high entrepreneurial activity in regions， and regions have not increased entrepreneurial activity in accordance with a certain fixed pattern. The driving mechanism of high entrepreneurial activity can be divided into three paths: “government-university” coordination-driven path， “government-industry” coordination-driven path and “industry-university” coordination-driven path. At present， no region uses the perfect synergy of “government-industry-university” to achieve high entrepreneurial activity， and it is limited to the coordinated operation of the two.

Key words: entrepreneurial activity; triple helix; QCA(qualitative comparative analysis); government-industry-university; cooperation entrepreneurship

CLC Number:

C936

JIA Jian-feng， LIU Wei-peng， ZHANG Wei-guo. Influence of “Government-Industry-University” Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(11): 1640-1649.

References

[1]赵涛，张智，梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据［J］.管理世界，2020，36(10):65-76.(Zhao Tao，Zhang Zhi，Liang Shang-kun.Digital economy，entrepreneurship，and high-quality economic development:Empirical evidence from urban China［J］.Management World，2020，36(10):65-76.)
[2]Carayannis E G，Campbell D F J.Triple helix，quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge，innovation and the environment relate to each other?a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology［J］.International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development，2010，1(1):41-69.
[3]Galán-Muros V，Plewa C.What drives and inhibits university business cooperation in Europe? a comprehensive assessement［J］.R & D Management，2016，46(2):369-382.
[4]Yu C W.Understanding the ecosystems of Chinese and American entrepreneurship education［J］.Journal of Entrepreneurship Education，2018，21(2):1-18.
[5]Pique J M，Berbegal-Mirabent J，Etzkowitz H.Triple helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation:the case of Silicon Valley［J］.Triple Helix，2018，5(1):1-21.
[6]Temple P.The capitalization of knowledge:a triple helix of university-industry-government ［J］.Leadership & Organization Development Journal，2010，9(3):142-144.
[7]Champenois C，Etzkowitz H.From boundary line to boundary space:the creation of hybrid organizations as a triple helix micro-foundation［J］.Technovation，2018，76:28-39.
[8]陈劲，张学文.中国创新驱动发展与科技体制改革(2012—2017)［J］.科学学研究，2018，36(12):2116-2121.(Chen Jing，Zhang Xue-wen.Innovation-driven development and scientific and technical structural reform(2012—2017)［J］.Scientific Research，2018，36(12):2116-2121.)
[9]Lim D S K，Oh C H，de Clercq D.Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies:interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions［J］.International Business Review，2016，25(4):933-945.
[10]Shane S，Venkataraman S.The promise ofentrepreneurship as a field of research［J］.Academy of Management Review，2000，25(1):217-226.
[11]Ragin C C.Fuzzy-set social science［M］.Chicago:University of Chicago Press，2000:1-370.
[12]Fainshmidt S，Witt M A，Aguilera R V，et al.The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)to international business research［J］.Journal of International Business Studies，2020，51:455-466.
[13]Nola H D，Stephen R.Output additionality of public support for innovation:evidence for Irish manufacturing plants［J］.European Planning Studies，2010，18(1):107-122.
[14]Mazzei M J，Ketchen D J，Shook C L.Understanding strategic entrepreneurship:a “theoretical toolbox” approach［J］.International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal，2017，13(2):631-663.
[15]Audretsch D B，Belitski M.Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities:establishing the framework conditions［J］.The Journal of Technology Transfer，2017，42(5):1030-1051.
[16]Goethner M，Obschonka M，Silbereisen R K，et al.Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship:economic and psychological determinants［J］. Journal of Economic Psychology，2012，33(3):628-641.
[17]项国鹏，潘凯凌，张文满.网络关系、创业机会识别与创业决策——基于浙江新创企业的实证研究［J］.科技管理研究，2018，38(22):169-177.(Xiang Guo-peng，Pan Kai-ling，Zhang Wen-man.Network relation，entrepreneurial opportunity recognition and entrepreneurial decision-making:based on new ventures in Zhejiang Province［J］.Science and Technology Management Research，2018，38(22):169-177.)
[18]何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式［J］.科学学研究，2012，30(2):165-174.(He Yu-bing.The theoretical model of I-U-R collaborative innovation［J］.Scientific Research，2012，30(2):165-174.)
[19]Leydesdorff L.The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems［J］.Journal of Contemporary Sociology，2005，42(1):12-27.
[20]陈延良，李德丽.三螺旋理论视角下的政产学协同育人实践与模式构建［J］.黑龙江高教研究，2018(8):87-90.(Chen Yan-liang，Li De-li.Practice and model construction of collaborative education by government，industry and higher education institutions from perspective of triple helix theory［J］.Higher Education Research in Heilongjiang Province，2018(8):87-90.)
[21]Lai W H，Lin C C.Constructing business incubation service capabilities for tenants at post-entrepreneurial phase［J］.Journal of Business Research，2015，68(11):2285-2289.
[22]Marino M，Lhuillery S，Parrotta P，et al.Additionality or crowding-out? an overall evaluation of public R & D subsidy on private R & D expenditure［J］.Research Policy，2016，45(9):1715-1730.
[23]Levchenko A A.International trade and institutional change［J］.The Journal of Law，Economics & Organization，2013，29(5):1145-1181.
[24]Elitzur R，Gavious A.Selection of entrepreneurs in the venture capital industry:an asymptotic analysis［J］.European Journal of Operational Research，2011，215(3):705-712.
[25]Etzkowitz H，Leydesdorff L.The dynamics of innovation:from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations［J］.Research Policy，2000，29(2):109-123.
[26]Pittino D，Martínez A B，Chirico F，et al.Psychological ownership，knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms:the moderating role of governance heterogeneity［J］.Journal of Business Research，2018，84:312-326.
[27]KruegerJr N F，Reilly M D，Carsrud A L.Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions［J］.Journal of Business Venturing，2000，15(5/6):411-432.(上接第1639页)