
Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 154-162.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2025.20240209
• Resources & Civil Engineering • Previous Articles
Xiao-meng SI1, Jiu-hong ZHANG1(
), Jiang AN1, Ming-xiao MA2
Received:2024-11-08
Online:2025-11-15
Published:2026-02-07
Contact:
Jiu-hong ZHANG
CLC Number:
Xiao-meng SI, Jiu-hong ZHANG, Jiang AN, Ming-xiao MA. Experimental Study on Physiological and Subjective Thermal Responses of Different Age Groups Under Stepwise Temperature Changes[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2025, 46(11): 154-162.
| 测量参数 | 设备型号 | 量程 | 精度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 空气温度/℃ | JT2180 | -20~85 | ±0.5 |
| 黑球温度/℃ | JT2180 | -20~85 | ±0.5 |
| 空气流速/(m·s-1) | JT2180 | 0.05~2.0 2.0~5.0 | ±(0.05+2%) ±(0.10±2%) |
| 相对湿度/% | JTR08 | 0~100 | ±1.5 |
Table 1 Thermal environment measuring instrument
| 测量参数 | 设备型号 | 量程 | 精度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 空气温度/℃ | JT2180 | -20~85 | ±0.5 |
| 黑球温度/℃ | JT2180 | -20~85 | ±0.5 |
| 空气流速/(m·s-1) | JT2180 | 0.05~2.0 2.0~5.0 | ±(0.05+2%) ±(0.10±2%) |
| 相对湿度/% | JTR08 | 0~100 | ±1.5 |
| 年龄组 | 年龄/岁 | 总计人数 | 身高/cm | 体重/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 6~12 | 15 | 128.4±12.6 | 28.5±7.6 |
| 青少年 | 13~18 | 15 | 158.8±8.6 | 58.2±4.4 |
| 青年 | 19~44 | 15 | 167.9±9.5 | 69.2±10.3 |
| 中年 | 45~59 | 15 | 165.7±8.6 | 58.9±11.2 |
Table 2 Subject information statistics (mean±
| 年龄组 | 年龄/岁 | 总计人数 | 身高/cm | 体重/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 6~12 | 15 | 128.4±12.6 | 28.5±7.6 |
| 青少年 | 13~18 | 15 | 158.8±8.6 | 58.2±4.4 |
| 青年 | 19~44 | 15 | 167.9±9.5 | 69.2±10.3 |
| 中年 | 45~59 | 15 | 165.7±8.6 | 58.9±11.2 |
| 阶段 | 具体时刻/min | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均皮肤温度/℃ | p值(前后对比) | 平均皮肤温度/℃ | p值(前后对比) | ||
| 降温 | 11 | 33.0±0.7 ℃ | p<0.01** | 33.4±0.2 ℃ | p<0.001*** |
| 15 | 30.4±1.3 ℃ | 30.9±0.4 ℃ | |||
| 升温 | 41 | 27.0±1.7 ℃ | p<0.01** | 27.5±0.6 ℃ | p<0.001*** |
| 45 | 30.1±1.0 ℃ | 31.1±0.4 ℃ | |||
| 热适应 | 10 | 33.2±0.8 ℃ | p<0.01** | 33.4±0.2 ℃ | p=0.402 |
| 70 | 32.5±0.9 ℃ | 33.5±0.3 ℃ | |||
Table 3 Comparison of average skin temperature at different time points
| 阶段 | 具体时刻/min | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均皮肤温度/℃ | p值(前后对比) | 平均皮肤温度/℃ | p值(前后对比) | ||
| 降温 | 11 | 33.0±0.7 ℃ | p<0.01** | 33.4±0.2 ℃ | p<0.001*** |
| 15 | 30.4±1.3 ℃ | 30.9±0.4 ℃ | |||
| 升温 | 41 | 27.0±1.7 ℃ | p<0.01** | 27.5±0.6 ℃ | p<0.001*** |
| 45 | 30.1±1.0 ℃ | 31.1±0.4 ℃ | |||
| 热适应 | 10 | 33.2±0.8 ℃ | p<0.01** | 33.4±0.2 ℃ | p=0.402 |
| 70 | 32.5±0.9 ℃ | 33.5±0.3 ℃ | |||
| 阶段 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | |
| 阶段1 | 0.77±0.36 | 1.75±1.78 | 1.88±0.87 | 3.87±3.35 | 0.82±0.37 | 2.79±3.20 | 3.62±3.73 | 4.17±3.60 |
| 9~11 min | 1.06±1.22 | 1.10±0.73 | 1.66±0.63 | 2.97±3.28 | 0.55±0.20 | 1.05±0.72 | 2.01±0.41 | 2.80±3.48 |
| 阶段2 | 1.51±2.01 | 1.78±0.81 | 2.21±2.16 | 2.27±1.43 | 1.40±0.25 | 1.73±1.98 | 2.52±3.00 | 1.44±2.88 |
| 39~41 min | 1.60±0.91 | 1.95±1.30 | 2.56±2.30 | 2.47±3.22 | 2.73±1.70 | 2.01±0.41 | 2.97±2.31 | 4.77±5.34 |
| 阶段3 | 0.90±0.49 | 1.90±0.22 | 2.21±2.16 | 6.12±6.40 | 3.21±2.16 | 2.36±1.70 | 2.85±1.82 | 3.26±1.47 |
Table 4 LF/HF index data statistics of different age groups under different thermal transient environments
| 阶段 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | |
| 阶段1 | 0.77±0.36 | 1.75±1.78 | 1.88±0.87 | 3.87±3.35 | 0.82±0.37 | 2.79±3.20 | 3.62±3.73 | 4.17±3.60 |
| 9~11 min | 1.06±1.22 | 1.10±0.73 | 1.66±0.63 | 2.97±3.28 | 0.55±0.20 | 1.05±0.72 | 2.01±0.41 | 2.80±3.48 |
| 阶段2 | 1.51±2.01 | 1.78±0.81 | 2.21±2.16 | 2.27±1.43 | 1.40±0.25 | 1.73±1.98 | 2.52±3.00 | 1.44±2.88 |
| 39~41 min | 1.60±0.91 | 1.95±1.30 | 2.56±2.30 | 2.47±3.22 | 2.73±1.70 | 2.01±0.41 | 2.97±2.31 | 4.77±5.34 |
| 阶段3 | 0.90±0.49 | 1.90±0.22 | 2.21±2.16 | 6.12±6.40 | 3.21±2.16 | 2.36±1.70 | 2.85±1.82 | 3.26±1.47 |
| 参数 | 配对比较 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | ||||
| SBP | 9 min与11 min比较 | 0.000*** | 0.027* | 0.013* | 0.008** | 0.000*** | 0.001*** | 0.001*** | 0.000*** | ||
| 11 min与39 min比较 | 0.700 | 0.659 | 0.656 | 0.350 | 0.065 | 0.947 | 0.157 | 0.236 | |||
| 39 min与41 min比较 | 0.003** | 0.048* | 0.045* | 0.024* | 0.000*** | 0.001*** | 0.001*** | 0.002** | |||
| 41 min与60 min比较 | 0.522 | 0.628 | 0.554 | 0.814 | 0.915 | 0.947 | 0.854 | 0.842 | |||
| DBP | 9 min与11 min比较 | 0.002** | 0.357 | 0.203 | 0.391 | 0.000*** | 0.048* | 0.002** | 0.000*** | ||
| 11 min与39 min比较 | 0.942 | 0.620 | 0.645 | 0.539 | 0.073 | 0.289 | 0.167 | 0.236 | |||
| 39 min与41 min比较 | 0.003** | 0.586 | 0.362 | 0.623 | 0.000*** | 0.045* | 0.009** | 0.015* | |||
| 41 min与60 min比较 | 0.610 | 0.655 | 0.324 | 0.623 | 0.780 | 0.638 | 0.542 | 0.608 | |||
Table 5 Post hoc multiple comparisons of SBP and DBP across different age groups at 18 ℃ and 24 ℃
| 参数 | 配对比较 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | 儿童 | 青少年 | 青年 | 中年 | ||||
| SBP | 9 min与11 min比较 | 0.000*** | 0.027* | 0.013* | 0.008** | 0.000*** | 0.001*** | 0.001*** | 0.000*** | ||
| 11 min与39 min比较 | 0.700 | 0.659 | 0.656 | 0.350 | 0.065 | 0.947 | 0.157 | 0.236 | |||
| 39 min与41 min比较 | 0.003** | 0.048* | 0.045* | 0.024* | 0.000*** | 0.001*** | 0.001*** | 0.002** | |||
| 41 min与60 min比较 | 0.522 | 0.628 | 0.554 | 0.814 | 0.915 | 0.947 | 0.854 | 0.842 | |||
| DBP | 9 min与11 min比较 | 0.002** | 0.357 | 0.203 | 0.391 | 0.000*** | 0.048* | 0.002** | 0.000*** | ||
| 11 min与39 min比较 | 0.942 | 0.620 | 0.645 | 0.539 | 0.073 | 0.289 | 0.167 | 0.236 | |||
| 39 min与41 min比较 | 0.003** | 0.586 | 0.362 | 0.623 | 0.000*** | 0.045* | 0.009** | 0.015* | |||
| 41 min与60 min比较 | 0.610 | 0.655 | 0.324 | 0.623 | 0.780 | 0.638 | 0.542 | 0.608 | |||
| 参数 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄组 | 不同时刻 | TSV | TCV | tsk | 年龄组 | 不同时刻 | TSV | TCV | tsk | |
| 年龄组 | 1 | 0 | -0.480** | -0.386** | 0.303* | 1 | 0 | -0.028 | 0.024 | |
不同 时刻 | 0 | 1 | 0.631** | 0.457** | 0.822** | 0 | 1 | 0.740** | -0.506** | 0.905** |
| TSV | -0.480** | 0.631** | 1 | -0.326* | 0.742** | -0.233* | 0.740** | 1 | -0.586** | 0.876** |
| TCV | -0.386** | 0.457** | -0.326* | 1 | 0.409** | -0.028 | -0.506** | -0.586** | 1 | -0.285* |
| tsk | 0.303* | 0.822** | 0.742** | 0.409** | 1 | 0.024 | 0.905** | 0.876** | -0.285* | 1 |
| 参数 | 18 ℃工况 | 24 ℃工况 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄组 | 不同时刻 | TSV | TCV | tsk | 年龄组 | 不同时刻 | TSV | TCV | tsk | |
| 年龄组 | 1 | 0 | -0.480** | -0.386** | 0.303* | 1 | 0 | -0.028 | 0.024 | |
不同 时刻 | 0 | 1 | 0.631** | 0.457** | 0.822** | 0 | 1 | 0.740** | -0.506** | 0.905** |
| TSV | -0.480** | 0.631** | 1 | -0.326* | 0.742** | -0.233* | 0.740** | 1 | -0.586** | 0.876** |
| TCV | -0.386** | 0.457** | -0.326* | 1 | 0.409** | -0.028 | -0.506** | -0.586** | 1 | -0.285* |
| tsk | 0.303* | 0.822** | 0.742** | 0.409** | 1 | 0.024 | 0.905** | 0.876** | -0.285* | 1 |
| [1] | Duan C X, Ding X D, Shi F G, et al. PMV-based fuzzy algorithms for controlling indoor temperature [C]//2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. Beijing, 2011: 1492-1496. |
| [2] | Xiong J, Lian Z W, Zhou X, et al. Potential indicators for the effect of temperature steps on human health and thermal comfort [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2016, 113: 87-98. |
| [3] | Liu W W, Lian Z W, Deng Q H, et al. Evaluation of calculation methods of mean skin temperature for use in thermal comfort study [J]. Building and Environment, 2011, 46 (2): 478-488. |
| [4] | 王泽军,王艾平,杨天,等.冷暴露环境下皮肤血管舒张反应的研究进展[J].军事医学, 2022, 46(12): 951-954. |
| Wang Ze-jun, Wang Ai-ping, Yang Tian, et al. Research progress in skin vasodilation under cold exposure environments[J]. Military Medical Sciences, 2022, 46(12): 951-954. | |
| [5] | 王斯涵,毕紫娟,袁培,等.脉率变异性与心率变异性相关性研究进展[J].辽宁中医杂志, 2021, 48(10): 216-220. |
| Wang Si-han, Bi Zi-juan, Yuan Pei, et al. Research progress of pulse rate variability replacing heart rate variability [J]. Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021, 48(10): 216-220. | |
| [6] | Yao Y, Lian Z W, Liu W W, et al. Experimental study on physiological responses and thermal comfort under various ambient temperatures [J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2008, 93(1/2): 310-321. |
| [7] | 孙建辉,童力,胡松涛,等.基于脑电的温度阶跃变化环境下的人体热舒适研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(21): 9054-9060. |
| Sun Jian-hui, Tong Li, Hu Song-tao, et al. Human thermal comfort under temperature step-change environment based on electroencephalography [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(21): 9054-9060. | |
| [8] | 刘宁,王刚,贾恩灿,等.不同室温下的人体生理参数与热感觉相关性[J].科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(1): 85-90. |
| Liu Ning, Wang Gang, Jia En-can, et al. Correlation between human physiological parameters and thermal sensation at different room temperatures [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 85-90. | |
| [9] | Piñol R A, Mogul A S, Hadley C K, et al. Preoptic BRS3 neurons increase body temperature and heart rate via multiple pathways [J]. Cell Metabolism, 2021, 33(7): 1389-1403. |
| [10] | Song C, Huang L, Liu Y F, et al. Effects of indoor thermal exposure on human dynamic thermal adaptation process [J]. Building and Environment, 2020, 179: 106990. |
| [11] | Wu Z B, Li N P, Schiavon S. Experimental evaluation of thermal comfort, SBS symptoms and physiological responses in a radiant ceiling cooling environment under temperature step-changes [J]. Building and Environment, 2022, 224: 109512. |
| [12] | Mansi S A, Pigliautile I, Arnesano M, et al. A novel methodology for human thermal comfort decoding via physiological signals measurement and analysis [J]. Building and Environment, 2022, 222: 109385. |
| [13] | Jia X Y, Li S S, Zhu Y X, et al. Transient thermal comfort and physiological responses following a step change in activity status under summer indoor environments [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2023, 285: 112918. |
| [14] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 民用建筑供暖通风与空气调节设计规范: [S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Design code for heating ventilation and air conditioning of civil buildings: [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. | |
| [15] | International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: instruments for measuring physical quantities: [S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1998. |
| [16] | Ahmad O B, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez A D, et al. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard [EB/OL] (2001-1) [2024-11-07]. . |
| [17] | Havenith G. Metabolic rate and clothing insulation data of children and adolescents during various school activities [J]. Ergonomics, 2007, 50(10): 1689-1701. |
| [18] | American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Engineers Air-Conditioning. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy: ANSI/A Standard 55-2023 [S]. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2023. |
| [19] | Ramanathan N L. A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body [J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1964, 19(3): 531-533. |
| [20] | 国家标准化管理委员会. 热环境人类工效学代谢率的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009. |
| Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: determination of metabolic rate: [S]. Beijing: Standardization Press of China, 2008. | |
| [21] | Brickman A M, Reitz C, Luchsinger J A, et al. Long-term blood pressure fluctuation and cerebrovascular disease in an elderly cohort [J]. Archives of Neurology, 2010, 67(5): 564-569. |
| [22] | Gagnon D D, Gagnon S S, Rintamäki H, et al. The effects of cold exposure on leukocytes, hormones and cytokines during acute exercise in humans [J]. PLOS One, 2014, 9(10): e110774. |
| [1] | ZHAN Zina, JIN Longzhe, WANG Yi, WANG Sheng. Distribution and Coupling Mechanism of Temperature and Relative Humidity in Underground Mine Refuge Chamber [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2014, 35(11): 1636-1640. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||