会话交际中的情绪研究:理据、路径与展望

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.017

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 132-139.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.017

会话交际中的情绪研究:理据、路径与展望

刘青松，马文

(山东大学外国语学院，山东济南250100)

收稿日期:2021-07-17 修回日期:2021-07-17 接受日期:2021-07-17 发布日期:2022-11-26
通讯作者: 刘青松
作者简介:刘青松(1992-)，男，河南固始人，山东大学博士研究生，主要从事会话分析、语用学研究;马文(1972-)，男，山东梁山人，山东大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事会话分析、语用学研究。
基金资助:
山东省社会科学规划研究重点资助项目(21BYYJ01);山东大学人文社会科学研究重大资助项目(19RWZD14)。

Research on Emotions in Conversational Communication: Motivations， Paths and Prospects

LIU Qingsong， MA Wen

(School of Foreign Languages and Literature， Shandong University， Jinan 250100， China)

Received:2021-07-17 Revised:2021-07-17 Accepted:2021-07-17 Published:2022-11-26
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情绪不同于情感，具有短暂、强烈、依赖情境的特质，对会话发展产生重要的影响。会话交际中的情绪起到展现立场、充当社会信号和建构互动资源的作用。从主位角度出发，将情绪作为正式的研究对象，观察追踪互动过程中会话参与者如何利用和对待情绪，其意义在于更好分析情绪背后的社会行为，揭示会话交际的本质与规律。总体来看，考察会话情绪的路径主要包括对言语资源、韵律资源和具身资源的分析，同时可借助必要的现代技术和精密设备。

关键词: 会话交际; 会话情绪; 会话分析; 言语资源; 韵律资源; 具身资源

Abstract: In contrast to affect， emotion has the characteristics of being short-lived， strong， and situation-dependent， which influences the advancing of a conversation. Emotions in conversational communication play a role in showing positions， acting as social signals and constructing interactive resources. The significance of taking emotions as a focused research object based on an emic approach is to better analyze the social behaviors behind emotions and disclose the nature and law of conversational communication. Conversation analysts need to observe and track down how participants make use of or respond to emotions. In general， the approaches to explore emotions in conversation mainly include the analysis of verbal resources， prosodic resources and embodied resources， and resorting to modern technologies and equipment when necessary.

Key words: conversational communication; emotions in conversation; conversation analysis; verbal resource; prosodic resource; embodied resource

中图分类号:

H030

刘青松，马文. 会话交际中的情绪研究:理据、路径与展望[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(6): 132-139.

LIU Qingsong， MA Wen. Research on Emotions in Conversational Communication: Motivations， Paths and Prospects[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2022, 24(6): 132-139.

参考文献

[1]Perkyl A. Epilogue: What Does the Study of Interaction Offer to Emotion Research?［M］∥Perkyl A，Sorjonen M L. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press， 2012.
[2]Clift R. Visible Deflation: Embodiment and Emotion in Interaction［J］. Research on Language and Social Interaction， 2014，47(4):380-403.
[3]Jrgensen S. Exploring Emotional Aspects of Care and Control in Social Work with Children and Families: a Single Case Analysis of Conversation［J］. Journal of Social Work Practice， 2019，33(4):385-402.
[4]Ruusuvuori J. Emotion， Affect and Conversation［M］∥Sidnell J，Stivers T. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell， 2013.
[5]张浩. 论情绪和情感及其在认识中的功能——主体认识结构中的非理性要素研究［J］. 广东社会科学， 2006(6):78-84.
[6]Couper-Kuhlen E. A Sequential Approach to Affect: the Case of “Disappointment”［M］∥Haakana M，Laakso M，Lindstrm J. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society， 2009.
[7]Ekman P，Friesen W V. Constants Across Cultures in the Face and Emotion［J］. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology， 1971，17(2):124-129.
[8]Harmon-Jones E. Clarifying the Emotive Functions of Asymmetrical Frontal Cortical Activity［J］. Psychophysiology， 2003，40:838-848.
[9]乐国安，董颖红. 情绪的基本结构: 争论、应用及其前瞻［J］. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2013(1):140-150.
[10]Mehrabian A，Russell J. An Approach to Environmental Psychology［M］. Cambridge: MIT Press， 1974.
[11]Mehrabian A. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: a General Framework for Describing and Measuring Individual Differences in Temperament［J］. Current Psychology: Developmental， Learning， Personality， Social， 1996，14(4):261-292.
[12]Goodwin M H，Cekaite A，Goodwin C. Emotion as Stance［M］∥Perkyl A，Sorjonen M L. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press， 2012.
[13]Du Bois J W. The Stance Triangle［M］∥Englebretson R. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity， Evaluation， Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins， 2007:139-182.
[14]Kaukomaa T，Perkyl A，Ruusuvuori J. How Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of the Speaker's Utterance［J］. Research on Language and Social Interaction， 2015，48(3):319-341.
[15]Bateman A. Young Children's Affective Stance Through Embodied Displays of Emotion During Tellings［J］. Text & Talk， 2020，40(5):643-668.
[16]Fridlund A J，Duchaine B. Facial Expression of Emotion and the Delusion of the Hermetic Self［M］∥Harre R，Parrott W G. The Emotions-social， Cultural and Biological Dimensions. London: Sage， 1996:259-284.
[17]Ginzburg J，Mazzocconi C，Tian Y. Laughter as Language［J］. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics， 2020，5(1):1-51.
[18]Sorjonen M L，Perkyl A. An Introduction［M］∥Perkyl A，Sorjonen M L. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press， 2012:3-15.
[19]陆镜光. 会话分析和汉语话语研究——新方法、新语料、新发现［J］. 汉语国际教育学报， 2020(1):3-25.
[20]Sutherland O，Perkyl A，Elliott R. Conversation Analysis of the Two-chair Self-soothing Task in Emotion-focused Therapy［J］. Psychotherapy Research， 2014，24(6):738-751.
[21]Hung E N，Leung G，Cheung J. Responding to Children's Emotion Talk: a Conversation Analysis of a Therapeutic Encounter Between a Social Worker and Two Siblings Using Child-centered Play Therapy［J］. Journal of Social Work Practice， 2019，33(4):433-445.
[22]Tainio L，Laine A. Emotion Work and Affective Stance in the Mathematics Classroom: the Case of IRE Sequences in Finnish Classroom Interaction［J］. Educational Studies in Mathematics， 2015，89(1):67-87.
[23]王文博. 从形式、行为到事件: 话语分析作为解构策略［J］. 东北大学学报(社会科学版)， 2021，23(3):120-126.
[24]Weiste E，Perkyl A. Prosody and Empathic Communication in Psychotherapy Interaction［J］. Psychotherapy Research， 2014，24(6):687-701.
[25]许俊. 汉语会话语言策略［M］. 长沙: 湖南大学出版社， 2012.
[26]Couper-Kuhlen E，Selting M. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2018:538.
[27]Schegloff E A. Reflections in Studying Prosody in Talk-in-interaction［J］. Language and Speech， 1998，41:235-263.
[28]Estellés-Arguedas M. Expressing Evidentiality Through Prosody? Prosodic Voicing in Reported Speech in Spanish Colloquial Conversations［J］. Journal of Pragmatics， 2015，85:138-154.
[29]Goodwin C. Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction［J］. Journal of Pragmatics， 2000，32:1489-1522.
[30]Goodwin C. Embodied Interaction in the Material World: an Introduction［M］∥Streeck J，Goodwin C，LeBaron C. Embodied Interaction， Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2011:1-26. ［31］Heath C，Luff P. Embodied Action and Organizational Activity［M］∥Sidnell J，Stivers T. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell， 2013.［32］Perkyl A，Ruusuvuori J. Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion［M］∥Perkyl A，Sorjonen M L. Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press， 2012:64-91.［33］Zeng H，Wang X，Wu A，et al. EmoCo: Visual Analysis of Emotion Coherence in Presentation Videos［J］. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics， 2019，26(1):927-937.

会话交际中的情绪研究:理据、路径与展望

Research on Emotions in Conversational Communication: Motivations， Paths and Prospects

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李淑晶，刘承宇. 语义关系视角的隐性评价机制研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(2): 208-214.
[2]	竹旭锋，何刚. 文化语用研究的三种范式及其相互关系[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(5): 539-544.
[3]	黄荷，于洋欢. 被困的尤利西斯:乔伊斯短篇小说《两个浪汉》的功能文体学分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(4): 427-434.
[4]	霍颖，刘薇. 美国两党气候变化演讲语篇的隐喻架构分析——以两次关于“巴黎气候协定”的总统演讲为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(3): 317-324.
[5]	夏登山. 人的语言使用行动是理性的吗?[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(5): 539-544.
[6]	郭飞，王振华. 人际语义分布对法律语篇中社会过程的体现[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(1): 97-103.
[7]	任蕊，赵夏文. 维特根斯坦语言世界中的意义观从逻辑到语言理解[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(5): 539-544.
[8]	夏登山. 多方交际中的联盟与礼貌行为研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(3): 318-323.
[9]	毛延生. 进化视角介入语用研究的困境阐释[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(1): 99-104.
[10]	郭爱萍. 网络环境下明喻与隐喻的理解机制研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 15(5): 541-545.
[11]	任育新，陈新仁. 英语话语重述现象的语用分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2012, 14(6): 549-554.
[12]	王文博. 从形式、行为到事件:话语分析作为解构策略[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(3): 120-126.