CEO声誉促进了企业社会责任承担吗?——双重代理成本的中介效应

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.06.003

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 15-25.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.06.003

CEO声誉促进了企业社会责任承担吗?——双重代理成本的中介效应

徐宁，张媛，张迪

(山东大学管理学院，山东济南250100)

发布日期:2023-11-27
通讯作者: 徐宁
作者简介:徐宁(1982-)，女，山东济南人，山东大学副教授，博士生导师，主要从事公司治理研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72372090，71872103);国家社会科学基金资助项目(20BJY110)。

Does CEO Reputation Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? The Mediating Effect of Dual Agency Costs

XU Ning， ZHANG Yuan， ZHANG Di

(School of Management， Shandong University， Jinan 250100， China)

Published:2023-11-27
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： CEO声誉能够向外界传递一种良好的信号，而声誉机制在实践中也能够发挥对企业社会责任承担的促进效应。研究表明:高声誉CEO能够促进企业积极履行社会责任，在稳健性检验与内生性处理之后，该结论仍然成立;双重代理成本在CEO声誉与企业社会责任之间的关系中起到显著的中介作用，声誉能够激励代理人减少机会主义行为，降低第一类代理成本，同时也能够减少代理人与控股股东之间的合谋，降低第二类代理成本，继而使CEO更加关注全体利益相关者的诉求;分析师关注度与市场竞争强度作为外部压力能够强化CEO声誉对企业社会责任的正向作用，实现内外部治理因素的协同效应。

关键词: CEO声誉; 企业社会责任; 双重代理成本; 分析师关注度; 市场竞争强度

Abstract: CEO reputation can convey a good signal to the outside world， and the reputation mechanism can also play a promoting effect on corporate social responsibility in practice. It is found that CEOs with high reputation will promote enterprises to actively fulfill social responsibility. This conclusion still holds after robustness test and endogeneity treatment. Dual agency costs play a significant mediating role in the relationship between CEO reputation and corporate social responsibility. Reputation can motivate agents to reduce opportunistic behaviors and reduce the first type of agency costs so as to strengthen their attention to social responsibility. At the same time， reputation can reduce the collusion between agents and controlling shareholders， reduce the second type of agency costs， and make CEOs pay more attention to the needs of all stakeholders; as external pressure factors， the degree of analysts' concerns and the degree of market competition can strengthen the positive effect of CEO reputation on corporate social responsibility and realize the synergistic effect of internal and external governance factors.

Key words: CEO reputation; corporate social responsibility(CSR); dual agency cost; analysts' concern; market competition

中图分类号:

F276.6

徐宁，张媛，张迪. CEO声誉促进了企业社会责任承担吗?——双重代理成本的中介效应[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 25(6): 15-25.

XU Ning， ZHANG Yuan， ZHANG Di. Does CEO Reputation Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? The Mediating Effect of Dual Agency Costs[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2023, 25(6): 15-25.

参考文献

[1]Battisti E，Nirino N，Leonidou E，et al. Corporate Venture Capital and CSR Performance: an Extended Resource Based View's Perspective［J］. Journal of Business Research， 2022，139:1058-1066.
[2]李维安，郝臣，崔光耀，等. 公司治理研究40年:脉络与展望［J］. 外国经济与管理， 2019，41(12):161-185.
[3]徐宁，吴皞玉，王帅. 动力抑或负担?——高管声誉双重治理效用研究述评与展望［J］. 外国经济与管理， 2017，39(10):102-113.
[4]Kreps D M，Milgrom P，Roberts J，et al. Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners's Dilemma［J］. Journal of Economic Theory， 1982，27(2):245-252.
[5]Hasan M M，Habib A，Zhao R. Corporate Reputation Risk and Cash Holdings［J］. Accounting & Finance， 2022，62(1):667-707.
[6]Downing J A，Ma Q. Structure in Chaos: Entrepreneurial Reputation Effects on Performance During Volatility［J］. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship， 2017，29(6):461-476.
[7]Konadu R，Owusu-Agyei S，Lartey T A，et al. CEOs' Reputation， Quality Management and Environmental Innovation: the Roles of Stakeholder Pressure and Resource Commitment［J］. Business Strategy and the Environment， 2020，29(6):2310-2323.
[8]Tversky A，Kahneman D. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: a Reference-dependent Model［J］. The Quarterly Journal of Economics， 1991，106(4):1039-1061.
[9]Klein J，Dawar N. Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-harm Crisis［J］. International Journal of Research in Marketing， 2004，21(3):203-217.
[10]Lovelace J，Jonathan B，Hambrick D C，et al. The Shackles of CEO Celebrity: Sociocognitive and Behavioral Role Constraints on “STAR” Leaders ［J］. Academy of Management Review， 2018，43(3):419-444.
[11]王垒，曲晶，赵忠超，等. 组织绩效期望差距与异质机构投资者行为选择:双重委托代理视角［J］. 管理世界， 2020，36(7):132-153.
[12]赵国宇. 大股东控股，报酬契约与合谋掏空——来自民营上市公司的经验证据［J］. 外国经济与管理， 2017，39(7):105-117.
[13]Shan Y G. Can Internal Governance Mechanisms Prevent Asset Appropriation? Examination of Type I Tunneling in China［J］. Corporate Governance: An International Review， 2013，21(3):225-241.
[14]周泽将，雷玲，王彪华. 高管廉洁抑制了大股东掏空吗?——来自中国国有上市公司的经验证据［J］. 管理评论， 2022，34(4):279-292.
[15]徐宁，吴皞玉. 高管声誉影响了上市公司权力配置吗?——双重代理关系框架下的实证研究［J］. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报)， 2018，38(6):31-44.
[16]Ferrell A，Liang H，Renneboog L. Socially Responsible Firms［J］. Journal of Financial Economics， 2016，122(3):585-606.
[17]Lee M P. Configuration of External Influences:the Combined Effects of Institutions and Stakeholders on Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies［J］. Journal of Business Ethics， 2011，102(2):281-298.
[18]Sun J，Liu G P. Does Analyst Coverage Constrain Real Earnings Management?［J］. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance， 2016，59:131-140.
[19]吴昊旻，张可欣. 长计还是短谋: 战略选择、市场竞争与企业环境责任履行［J］. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报)， 2021，41(7):19-38.
[20]张建君. 竞争—承诺—服从: 中国企业慈善捐款的动机［J］. 管理世界， 2013(9):118-129.
[21]辛宇，宋沛欣，徐莉萍，等. 经营投资问责与国有企业规范化运作——基于高管违规视角的经验证据［J］. 管理世界， 2022，38(12):199-221.
[22]李辰颖，杨海燕. CEO声誉受哪些因素影响: 理论与实证［J］. 当代经济管理， 2012，34(3):19-26.
[23]Ang J S，Cole R A，Lin J W. Agency Costs and Ownership Structure［J］. The Journal of Finance， 2000，55(1):81-106.
[24]高雷，张杰. 公司治理、机构投资者与盈余管理［J］. 会计研究， 2008(9):64-72.
[25]谭松涛，崔小勇. 上市公司调研能否提高分析师预测精度［J］. 世界经济， 2015，38(4):126-145.
[26]宋清，刘奕惠. 市场竞争程度、研发投入和中小科技企业创新产出——基于风险投资调节的条件过程分析［J］. 中国软科学， 2021(10):182-192.
[27]Giroud X，Mueller H M. Corporate Governance， Product Market Competition， and Equity Prices［J］. The Journal of Finance， 2011，66(2):563-600.
[28]刘计含，王建琼. 中国传统文化视角下的企业社会责任行为研究［J］. 管理世界， 2017(3):184-185.

CEO声誉促进了企业社会责任承担吗?——双重代理成本的中介效应

Does CEO Reputation Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? The Mediating Effect of Dual Agency Costs

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价