东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 108-117.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.01.012

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

区块链技术和个人信息权利之冲突与消融

童云峰1,2   

  1. (1.东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189;2.华东政法大学中国法治战略研究院,上海201620)
  • 发布日期:2024-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 童云峰
  • 作者简介:童云峰(1992-),男,安徽无为人,东南大学博士研究生,华东政法大学副研究员,主要从事数字刑法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(22AFX008);中国法学会资助项目(CLS(2022)D68)。

The Conflict Between Blockchain Technology and Personal Information Rights and Its Dissolution

TONG Yunfeng1,2   

  1. (1. Law School, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China; 2. China Institute of Strategic Rule of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China)
  • Published:2024-01-30
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 区块链技术的不可篡改性与更正权、被遗忘权、数据可携带权等个人信息新式权利存有抵牾,可能会违背数据最小化等个人信息基本原则,导致区块链技术存在合规难题,直接制约着区块链技术的发展与创新。为寻找区块链技术与个人信息权利的兼容方案,学界的既有研究思路,多属于修正区块链核心技术优势以适应滞后法律规则的区块链改造论,会遮蔽区块链的信任基础和技术优势。应转变思路选择法律适应论,最彻底的方案是革新个人信息的法律规则,构筑区块链豁免机制;相对缓和的方案是,在法律修订前,可借助目的解释论,对被遗忘权作软化解释、对匿名数据作扩大解释、对告知同意作重新解释等,推动区块链与个人信息权利的适度兼容。

关键词: 区块链技术; 个人信息权利; 被遗忘权; 可携带权

Abstract: The new personal information rights, such as the right to correct, the right to be forgotten and the right to carry data, may violate the basic principles of personal information such as data minimization, and lead to the compliance problems of blockchain technology, which directly restricts the development and innovation of blockchain technology. In order to find a compatible solution between blockchain technology and personal information rights, the existing research ideas in the academic circle mostly belong to the blockchain transformation theory of revising the core technology advantages of blockchain to adapt to the lagging legal rules, which will obscure the trust foundation and technical advantages of blockchain. We should change our thinking and choose the legal adaptation theory. The most thorough solution is to reform the legal rules of personal information and construct a block chain exemption mechanism. To promote moderate compatibility between blockchain and personal information rights, a relatively mild solution is to use teleological interpretation theory to soften the interpretation of the right to be forgotten, expand the interpretation of anonymous data, and reinterpret disclosure and consent before the legal reform.

Key words: blockchain technology; personal information rights; the right to be forgotten; the right to carry

中图分类号: