东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 117-125.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.01.013

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

认罪认罚从宽制度下的辩护冲突

郭恒   

  1. (太原理工大学文法学院,山西太原030024)
  • 发布日期:2024-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 郭恒
  • 作者简介:郭恒(1981-),男,山西榆次人,太原理工大学讲师,法学博士,主要从事刑事诉讼法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(22AFX008);中国法学会资助项目(CLS(2022)D68)。

Defense Conflicts Under the Leniency System of Guilty Plea and Punishment

GUO Heng   

  1. (College of Humanities and Law, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
  • Published:2024-01-30
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 认罪认罚从宽制度下“检察主导模式”、“控审合作模式”、辩护律师职业伦理与被追诉人自身利益考量之间的矛盾,以及辩护律师与值班律师差别性法律帮助权是引发辩护冲突的主要原因。认罪认罚案件中辩护律师处理辩护冲突应当以辩护律师的忠诚义务为出发点,坚持有限的独立辩护原则,强化辩护律师的协商义务,并在特定情形下履行对法庭的真实义务。审查起诉阶段认罪认罚案件的辩护冲突要区分“认罪”协商与“认罚”协商之辩护冲突分别处理,并确立审查起诉阶段控辩争议问题待处理的程序机制。审判阶段认罪认罚案件的辩护冲突要区分“定性”与“定量”存在争议的案件分别处理,并构建审判阶段辩方否定认罪认罚的程序规则。

关键词: 认罪认罚; 控辩合意; 辩护冲突; 协商义务

Abstract: Under the leniency system of guilty plea and punishment, the main reasons resulting in defense conflicts are “the prosecutorial-led model”, “the prosecutorial-trial cooperation model”, and the professional ethics of defense lawyers with the consideration of the defendant's own interests, and the differentiated right of legal assistance between defense lawyers and duty lawyers. In the case of guilty plea and punishment, defense lawyers should deal with defense conflicts based on their loyalty obligations, adhere to the principle of limited independent defense, strengthen their negotiation obligations, and perform their real obligations to the court under specific circumstances. The defense conflicts in the case of guilty plea and punishment in the review and prosecution stage should be handled separately by distinguishing between the defense conflicts of “guilty plea” negotiation and “punishment” negotiation, and the procedural mechanism of pending prosecution and defense disputes in the review and prosecution stage should be established. The defense conflicts in the case of guilty plea and punishment at the trial stage should be handled separately by distinguishing between “qualitative” and “quantitative” controversial cases, and the procedural rules for the defense to deny guilty plea and punishment at the trial stage should be constructed.

Key words: guilty plea and punishment; consensual prosecution and defense; defense conflict; negotiation obligation

中图分类号: