东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 29-41.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.04.005

• 经济与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会发展水平、社会公平感与主观幸福感的关系研究——基于CGSS 2018数据的实证分析

李卓1,王延涛2,张红阳3   

  1. (1.清华大学社会科学学院,北京100084;2.司法部预防犯罪研究所,北京100871;3.中共浙江省委党校公共管理教研部,浙江杭州311121)
  • 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 李卓
  • 作者简介:李卓(1992-),男,山东淄博人,清华大学博士研究生,主要从事基层社会治理与社会发展研究;王延涛(1985-),男,山东德州人,司法部预防犯罪研究所助理研究员,主要从事犯罪预防和犯罪治理研究;张红阳(1987-),男,河北迁安人,中共浙江省委党校副教授,清华大学博士后研究人员,主要从事城镇化、社会治理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(21CSH044)。

Study on the Relationship Between Social Development, Social Justice Perception and Subjective Well-being: An Empirical Analysis Based on CGSS 2018 Data

LI Zhuo1, WANG Yantao2, ZHANG Hongyang3   

  1. (1. School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. The Crime Prevention Research Institute, Ministry of Justice, Beijing 100871, China; 3. Public Management Department, The Party School of the CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee, Hangzhou 311121, China)
  • Published:2024-09-03
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 不断提高人民群众的幸福感,是党和政府的重要工作目标。基于CGSS 2018数据,构建分层线性模型,对社会发展水平、社会公平感与主观幸福感之间的关系进行实证分析。研究结果表明:社会发展水平和社会公平感均对居民的主观幸福感具有显著的正向影响;社会公平感对主观幸福感的影响受社会发展水平的调节,社会发展水平与社会公平感对主观幸福感的影响具有替代效应;在社会发展水平较低的省份、中西部及农村地区,社会公平感对主观幸福感影响更大。因此,社会发展水平较低的省份和地区,未来面临着推动社会发展和促进社会公平的双重压力,要避免发展不足与不公平对居民幸福感造成的负面效应叠加;社会发展水平较高的省份和地区,要注重发展总量向更高发展质量转型,提升发展的公平性,为提高居民幸福感“锦上添花”。

关键词: 社会发展; 社会公平感; 主观幸福感; 调节效应

Abstract: Continuously enhancing the happiness of the people is a key goal of the CPC and the Chinese government. Based on CGSS data of 2018, a hierarchical linear model is constructed to empirically analyze the relationship between social development, social justice perception, and subjective well-being. The results show that social development and social justice perception both have a positive impact on the subjective well-being of citizens. The influence of social justice perception on subjective well-being is regulated by the level of social development, and social development and social justice perception have a substitution effect on the influence of subjective well-being. In provinces with lower levels of social development, the central and western regions and rural areas, the impact of social justice perception on subjective well-being is greater. Therefore, these provinces and regions with lower levels of development will face dual pressures in promoting social development and social equity in the future. They should strive to avoid the negative effects of underdevelopment and social injustice on well-being of the citizens. Provinces and regions with higher levels of development should focus on the transformation from a relatively large total development volume to a higher development quality to further improve the social justice and add to the well-being of the citizens.

Key words: social development; social justice perception; subjective well-being; regulatory effect

中图分类号: