东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 103-111.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.04.012

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新技术背景下数字法治政府建设的检视与思考

邓栩健   

  1. (北京大学法学院,北京100871)
  • 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 邓栩健
  • 作者简介:邓栩健(1996-),男,湖南长沙人,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事宪法学与行政法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(19ZDA163)。

Reviewing and Reflecting on the Construction of Digital Rule-of-Law Government Under the Background of New Technologies

DENG Xujian   

  1. (School of Law, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Published:2024-09-03
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 当前“数字法治政府建设”陷入了一定的误区,暴露出一定的问题:在理论上,“宏观方案构建”板块的研究中存在“先入为主”式的技术偏见以及“望文生义”式的认知偏见;“具体技术应用”板块下部分快餐式的研究以及热点导向型的探索使得研究结论的效度、研究对象的限度、研究内容的维度和成果适用的广度处于非理想状态。实践中政府部门在对待技术纰漏、回应考核指标、探索数字化红利、整合部门机构资源、调整和优化传统行政程序等方面也暴露出一定的形式化倾向。对此,应当从夯实技术支撑和强化顶层设计两大维度纠正上述偏差:加强技术学习,赋能学科研究;重视技术应用,反哺学科研究;理顺体制机制,明确责任分工;统一技术标准,消除信息孤岛;摒弃政绩追求,兼顾权利救济;完善法律规制,平衡价值冲突。

关键词: 数字法治政府; 学科壁垒; 区块链

Abstract: Currently, the construction of a “digital rule-of-law government” has fallen into certain misconceptions and exposed some problems. Theoretical research in the “macro plan construction” section suffers from “preconceived” technical bias and “misinterpretation” cognitive bias. Some fast-food-style research and hot-topic-oriented explorations in the “specific technology application” section have led to non-ideal states in the validity of research conclusions, the limitations of research subjects, the dimensions of research content, and the breadth of research results applicability. In practice, government departments have also revealed a certain tendency towards formalism in dealing with technical loopholes, responding to assessment indicators, exploring digital dividends, integrating departmental resources, and reconciling traditional administrative procedures. To address these issues, it is necessary to correct and respond to deviations from two dimensions: strengthening technical support and enhancing top-level design. This can be achieved by strengthening technical learning and empowering discipline research, valuing technology application and supporting discipline research, streamlining institutional mechanisms and clarifying division of responsibilities, unifying technical standards and eliminating information islands, abandoning the pursuit of political achievements while also considering the relief of rights, and improving legal regulation to balance value conflicts.

Key words: digital rule-of-law government; disciplinary barriers; blockchain

中图分类号: