东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 13-21.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2025.06.002

• 科技伦理与哲学思辨 • 上一篇    下一篇

元宇宙世界中责任鸿沟的消解模式探析

原黎黎, 包国光   

  1. 东北大学 马克思主义学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-26 出版日期:2025-11-25 发布日期:2025-12-03
  • 作者简介:原黎黎,东北大学博士研究生
    包国光,东北大学教授,博士生导师。

Analysis of the Resolution Model for the Responsibility Gap in the Metaverse World

Lili YUAN, Guoguang BAO   

  1. School of Marxism,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China
  • Received:2024-02-26 Online:2025-11-25 Published:2025-12-03

摘要:

通过对元宇宙世界中“责任鸿沟”的根源及有效消解模式的深度剖析,重新诠释了责任鸿沟的内涵与类型。从伦理学视角出发阐明了“关系法”和“诠释法”的长处与不足,并在此基础上提出了“社会—人机”关系模式,赋予了非人类实体以关系责任,消解了自主系统无法承担道德责任的困境;基于“诠释法”提出了“历史—虚构”叙事模式,明确了人类应对自主系统的行为及后果负有叙事责任。经对比得出二者具有互补性,包括责任分配因素的互补、人类与非人类实体责任的互补,以及法律责任、道德责任、民主责任和主动责任之间的互补。因此,采取“关系法”和“诠释法”的协同模式来消解责任鸿沟,有助于建立负责任和可持续的元宇宙世界系统。

关键词: 元宇宙, 责任鸿沟, 关系法, 诠释法, 协同模式

Abstract:

Through an in-depth analysis of the root causes and effective solution models for “responsibility gap” in the metaverse world, the connotation and types of responsibility gap are reinterpreted. From an ethical perspective, while discussing the strengths and limitations of “relationship method” and “interpretive method”, it introduces the “society-human-machine” relationship model that assigns relational responsibility to non-human entities, resolving the issue of autonomous systems being unable to bear moral responsibilities. Additionally, by using the interpretive method, it presents the “history-fiction” narrative model, clearly defining the narrative responsibility of humans for the actions and consequences of autonomous systems. Comparative studies have shown that these two methods are complementary, including the complementarity of responsibility allocation factors, the complementarity of human and non-human entity responsibilities, and the complementarity of legal, moral, democratic, and active responsibilities. Therefore, adopting a collaborative model of the relationship method and the interpretive method to bridge the responsibility gap is helpful to establish a responsible and sustainable metaverse world system.

Key words: metaverse, responsibility gap, relationship method, interpretive method, collaborative model

中图分类号: