东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 116-126.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.03.013

• 教育研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识生产模式3视角下澳大利亚高校科研评价改革的新动向及启示——基于“卓越科研框架2023”的分析

石雪怡1，王思懿2   

  1. (1.上海交通大学教育学院，上海200240;2.西南财经大学公共管理学院，四川成都611130)
  • 发布日期:2024-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 石雪怡
  • 作者简介:石雪怡(1997-)，女，上海人，上海交通大学博士研究生，主要从事高等教育管理与评估、高等工程教育研究;王思懿(1993-)，女，四川眉山人，西南财经大学副教授，管理学博士，主要从事高等教育管理与政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(22YJC880074)。

New Trends and Implications of the Research Evaluation Reform in Australian Universities from the Perspective of Knowledge Production Model 3: Analysis Based on Excellence in Research for Australia 2023

SHI Xueyi1， WANG Siyi2   

  1. (1. School of Education， Shanghai Jiao Tong University， Shanghai 200240， China; 2. School of Public Administration， Southwestern University of Finance and Economics， Chengdu 611130， China)
  • Published:2024-05-31
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

141

摘要： 知识生产模式3提倡科研的国际化发展，关注科研的社会公益性，这对各国科研评价的制度设计提出了新要求。从知识生产模式3视角看，澳大利亚的全国高校科研评价体系“卓越科研框架”(ERA)虽一定程度迎合了知识生产模式3情境下的科研评价变革趋势，但在评级量表设计、评价单元设置和评价运行管理方面仍存在阻碍科研的国际化发展、埋没科研的社会公益性、忽视科研的复杂性提升等问题。鉴于此，新一轮ERA2023进一步提升评级量表的区分度，紧扣国际基准重构评价标准体系，增设任务导向型评价单元，并加强对数据和新兴技术的合理应用。通过这些举措，ERA2023旨在通过科研评价切实增强澳大利亚高校科研的国际竞争力和社会公益性，同时平衡评价标准多样性和过程一致性间的张力，并寻求评价运行高成本的破解之策。澳大利亚的经验可以为我国构建以国家战略需求为导向的科研评价体系、形成具有全球竞争力的科研创新生态提供重要启示。

关键词: 澳大利亚; 高校; 科研评价; 卓越科研框架; 知识生产模式3

Abstract: The emergence of knowledge production model 3 that emphasizes the internationalization of research and focuses on the socially beneficial nature of research has put forward new requirements for the reform of research evaluation systems in various countries. From the theoretical perspective of knowledge production model 3， after several rounds of changes， Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)， which is the national university research evaluation system of Australian， has to a certain extent met the trend of changes in research evaluation under the background of knowledge production model 3， but there are still problems and weaknesses in the design of rating scales， the setting of evaluation units and the operation and management of evaluation， which hinders the internationalization of research， buries the social public interests of research， and neglects the complexity enhancement of research. In view of this， the new round of ERA 2023 further enhances the differentiation of rating scales， reconstructs the evaluation standard system by closely following the international benchmarks， adds task-oriented evaluation units， and strengthens the rational application of data and emerging technologies. Through these measures， ERA 2023 aims to effectively enhance the international competitiveness and social benefits of scientific research through research evaluation， while balancing the tension between the diversity of evaluation criteria and the consistency of the evaluation process， and seeking ways to break the high cost of running the evaluation. Australia's experience can provide important implications for China to build a scientific research evaluation system oriented by national strategic needs and to form a globally competitive scientific research and innovation ecology.

Key words: Australia; college and university; research evaluation; Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA); knowledge production model 3

中图分类号: