Hierarchical Study on the Influencing Factors of Grassroots Emergency Response Capacity Based on ISM-MICMAC Model

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.02.007

Abstract

Abstract: It is essential to clarify the hierarchical relationship between influencing factors and be able to identify key factors to support the improvement of grassroots emergency response capacity， which is affected by complex factors. The Delphi method is adopted to determine the influencing factors of grassroots emergency capability and the ISM model is used to construct the influencing factor system. The cross-influence matrix multiplication is used for confirmatory analysis. The influencing factor system of grassroots emergency capability is constructed， which consists of 25 factors and is divided into 9 levels and 3 factor groups. The factor groups affect grassroots emergency capability through different mechanisms from bottom to top. Based on the MICMAC driving force-dependence matrix， independent factor group， linkage factor group， dependent factor group， and autonomous factor group that affect grass-roots emergency capability are obtained， which are highly consistent in the nature of influence. Accordingly， policy recommendations are made as follows: strengthening top-level design， promoting the standardization of grassroots emergency work and increasing funding.

Key words: grassroots; emergency capability; institutional environment; executive subject; interpretative structural model

CLC Number:

C939

LI Hui， TENG Wuxiao. Hierarchical Study on the Influencing Factors of Grassroots Emergency Response Capacity Based on ISM-MICMAC Model[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2024, 26(2): 58-68.

References

[1]Andersson W A，Kennedy P A，Ressler E. Handbook of disaster research［M］. New York: Springer， 2007:411-416
[2]罗强强，陈涛，明承瀚. 风险视域下的超大城市社区韧性:结构、梗阻与进路——基于W市新冠肺炎疫情社区治理的多案例分析［J］. 城市问题， 2022(5):86-94.
[3]曲延春. 从“生活共同体”到“治理共同体”——突发公共卫生事件治理中的社区责任及其实现［J］. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版)， 2022，67(3):62-69.
[4]李玉倩，李扬. 突发公共卫生事件中基层政府的预警困境与治理对策［J］. 南京社会科学， 2022(5):75-82.
[5]程万里. 提升基层应急管理能力的实施困境与路径选择［J］. 人民论坛， 2022(8):55-57.
[6]张再生，孙雪松. 基层应急管理: 现实绩效、制度困境与优化路径［J］. 南京社会科学， 2019(10):83-90.
[7]刘万振，陈兴立. 社区应急能力建设的现状分析与路径选择——重庆市社区应急能力建设的调查与思考［J］. 行政法学研究， 2011(3):78-85.
[8]侯玉，刘焕明. 基层社区提升应急治理能力的考量［J］. 学校党建与思想教育， 2021(8):94-96.
[9]容志. 让基层应急系统运转起来: 城市生命体视角下的融通型结构［J］. 中国行政管理， 2021(6):136-144.
[10]夏志强. 公共危机治理多元主体的功能耦合机制探析［J］. 中国行政管理， 2009(5):122-125.
[11]郁建兴. 社会治理共同体及其建设路径［J］. 公共管理评论， 2019，1(3):59-65.
[12]程惠霞，魏淑敏. 基层党组织应急管理“桥角色”: 理论阐释与实现进路［J］. 中国行政管理， 2019(6):56-62.
[13]Tanwattana P. Systematizing community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM): case of urban flood-prone community in Thailand upstream area［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction， 2018，28:798-812.
[14]Donahue A K，Eckel C C，Wilson R K. Ready or not? how citizens and public officials perceive risk and preparedness［J］. The American Review of Public Administration， 2014，44(4):89S-111S.
[15]Mercer J，Gaillard J C，Crowley K，et al. Culture and disaster risk reduction: lessons and opportunities［J］. Environmental Hazards， 2012，11(2):74-95.
[16]Noll B，Filatova T，Need A. How does private adaptation motivation to climate change vary across cultures? evidence from a meta-analysis［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction， 2020，46:101615.
[17]Ikeda S，Nagasaka T. An emergent framework of disaster risk governance towards innovating coping capability for reducing disaster risks in local communities［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science， 2011，2:1-9.
[18]汪洛应. 系统工程［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社， 2006:45.
[19]Attri R，Dev N，Sharma V. Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview［J］. Research Journal of Management Sciences， 2013(2):1171.
[20]赵会茹，蒋慧娟，郭森. 基于ISM和MICMAC模型的电网公司运营预警指标研究［J］. 陕西电力， 2015，43(3):11-15.
[21]岳洪江，董敏凯. 社会科学成果转化影响因素解释结构模型分析［J］. 华东经济管理， 2019，33(2):176-184.
[22]Janes F R. Interpretive structural modelling: a methodology for structuring complex issues［J］. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control， 1988，10(3):145-154.
[23]韩志明. 街头官僚的行动逻辑与责任控制［J］. 公共管理学报， 2008，5(1):41-48.
[24]周雪光. 权威体制与有效治理: 当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑［J］. 开放时代， 2011(10):67-85.
[25]黄平平，刘文云，孙志腾. 基于ISM-MICMAC模型的政府数据开放中个人隐私保护影响因素分析［J］. 情报理论与实践， 2022，45(3):65-71.
[26]闪淳昌，周玲，秦绪坤，等. 我国应急管理体系的现状、问题及解决路径［J］. 公共管理评论， 2020，2(2):5-20.
[27]钟雯彬. 《突发事件应对法》面临的新挑战与修改着力点［J］. 理论与改革， 2020(4):24-37.
[28]金晓伟. 论我国紧急状态法制的实现条件与路径选择——从反思应急法律体系切入［J］. 政治与法律， 2021(5):123-135.
[29]周振超，张梁. 非常规重大突发事件“紧急行政”模式的法治优化［J］. 中国行政管理， 2021(2):137-145.
[30]林鸿潮，赵艺绚. 突发事件应对中的个人信息利用与法律规制——以新冠肺炎疫情应对为切入点［J］. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)， 2020(3):120-133.［31］Godschalk D R，Rose A，Mittler E，et al. Estimating the value of foresight: aggregate analysis of natural hazard mitigation benefits and costs［J］. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management， 2009，52(6):739-756.