Urban Belonging， Identity and Willingness of Migrant Workers to Return Home:An Empirical Study Based on CMDS Data

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.04.004

Abstract

Abstract: The overall promotion of rural revitalization is limited by insufficient human resources to a certain extent. The return of urban migrant workers is conducive to solving the problem of rural employment. Based on CMDS data in 2018， this paper empirically analyzes the impact of urban belonging on migrant workers' willingness to return home， examines the heterogeneity effect， and tests the mediating effect of identity between urban belonging and migrant workers' willingness to return home. The results show that urban belonging has a significant negative impact on migrant workers' willingness to return home. Migrant workers' willingness to return home is also affected by regional differences， age， health status， mobility characteristics， family endowment and so on. From the perspective of influence mechanism， identity plays an important mediating role. Based on these conclusions， we should strengthen the overall planning of urban and rural development， develop relevant institutional arrangements in urban and rural areas according to local conditions， optimize the allocation of migrant workers' resources in urban and rural areas， and promote the new trend of urban-rural integration.

Key words: urban belonging; identity; migrant workers' willingness to return home; rural revitalization

CLC Number:

F323.6

SUN Zhenglin， ZHANG Zhiruo， CHEN Junlong. Urban Belonging， Identity and Willingness of Migrant Workers to Return Home:An Empirical Study Based on CMDS Data[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2023, 25(4): 25-36.

References

[1]Li G，Fang Y，Song Y，et al. Effects of Family Encouragement on Migrant Workers' Return-to-hometown Intention and Turnover: the Moderating Role of Career-related Concerns［J］. Career Development International， 2020，25(2):165-185.
[2]Liu R，Li T，Greene R. Migration and Inequality in Rental Housing: Affordability Stress in the Chinese Cities［J］. Applied Geography， 2020，115:102-138.
[3]李海波，毛现桩. 城市社会网络嵌入对农民工返乡创业意愿的影响——基于结构和关系双维度嵌入的实证分析［J］. 城市问题， 2021(4):33-42.
[4]王志涛，李晗冰. 身份认同、个人技能与农民工返乡意愿——基于CMDS数据的实证研究［J］. 经济经纬， 2021，38(3):34-43.
[5]Kunuroglu F. Psychosocial Adaptation of Turkish Return Migrants and Factors Affecting Their Intention to Remigrate to Europe: Personality， Perceived Discrimination， Ethnic Identity［J］. International Journal of Intercultural Relations， 2021，82:265-277.
[6]才国伟，张学志. 农民工的城市归属感与定居决策［J］. 经济管理， 2011，33(2):158-168.
[7]李东平，卢海阳. 公共服务满意度、城市归属感与农民工城市定居意愿——基于福建省厦门、泉州两地的调查分析［J］. 农村经济， 2020(3):136-143.
[8]Liu Z，Zhang Y，Zheng Y，et al. Sense of Belonging and Social Identity on the Settlement Intentions of Rural-urban Migrants: Evidence from China［J］. Ciencia Rural， 2019，49(8):1-12.
[9]朱平利，杨忠宝. 农民工城市归属感影响因素的多维分析［J］. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)， 2019，18(1):44-53.
[10]李辉，韩东，温馨. 新生代农民工城市归属感研究［J］. 吉林大学社会科学学报， 2019，59(3):119-127.
[11]Liu S，Zhang F，Wu F. Contrasting Migrants' Sense of Belonging to the City in Selected Peri-urban Neighbourhoods in Beijing［J］. Cities， 2022，120:103499.
[12]孙文凯，王格非. 流动人口社会身份认同、过度劳动与城乡差异［J］. 经济学动态， 2020(9):96-110.
[13]胡宜挺，王天然，常伟. 身份认同感、社会互动与农民工市民化——基于代际差异视角［J］. 农村经济， 2021(11):114-123.
[14]赵建国，王净净. 身份认同如何影响流动人口的就业质量?［J］. 当代经济科学， 2022，44(2):93-108.
[15]周战强，王馨. 身份认同与流动人口劳动时间［J］. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)， 2021(5):148-159.
[16]Tajfel H，Turner J C，Austin W G，et al. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict［J］. Organizational Identity: A Reader， 1979，33:94-109.
[17]胡洁. 社会认同: 多维呈现与社会建构——基于贵州三线建设者的口述史研究［J］. 宁夏社会科学， 2022(1):188-196.
[18]Zhang J，Huang J，Wang J，et al. Return Migration and Hukou Registration Constraints in Chinese Cities［J］. China Economic Review， 2020，63:101498.
[19]Chen H，Zhu Z，Chang J，et al. The Effects of Social Integration and Hometown Identity on the Life Satisfaction of Chinese Rural Migrants: the Mediating and Moderating Effects of a Sense of Belonging in the Host City［J］. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes， 2020，18(1):171.
[20]米庆成. 进城农民工的城市归属感问题探析［J］. 青年研究， 2004(3):25-32.
[21]何微微，胡小平. 认同、归属与发展:新生代农民工留城意愿的影响研究——基于重庆市的调研数据［J］. 农村经济， 2017(8):122-127.
[22]李志刚，梁奇，林赛南. 转型期中国大城市流动人口的身份认同、特征与机制［J］. 地理科学， 2020，40(1):40-49.
[23]Stets J E，Burke P J. Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory［J］. Social Psychology Quarterly， 2000，63(3):224-237.
[24]Hogg M A，Meehan C，Farquharson J. The Solace of Radicalism: Self-uncertainty and Group Identification in the Face of Threat［J］. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology， 2010，46(6):1061-1066.
[25]Mai X，Wang J. Situational Differences， Migratory Duration， and Social Integration of Internal Migrants in Urban China［J］. Cities， 2022，125:103596.
[26]詹韵秋，王军，陶原野. 身份认同、城镇化水平与农业转移人口的环保行为［J］. 中国经济问题， 2021(5):73-88.
[27]Ullah A A，Hasan N H，Mohamad S M， et al. Privileged Migrants and Their Sense of Belonging: Insider or Outsider?［J］. Asian Journal of Social Science， 2021，49(3):161-169.
[28]祝仲坤. 公共卫生服务如何影响农民工留城意愿——基于中国流动人口动态监测调查的分析［J］. 中国农村经济， 2021(10): 125-144.(上接第24页)
[13]严成樑，龚六堂. 财政支出、税收与长期经济增长［J］. 经济研究， 2009，44(6):4-15.
[14]贺俊，吴照. 政府公共支出结构与内生经济增长——基于省际面板数据的分析［J］. 上海经济研究， 2013，25(6):14-22.
[15]范庆泉，周县华，潘文卿. 从生产性财政支出效率看规模优化: 基于经济增长的视角［J］. 南开经济研究， 2015(5):24-39.
[16]Korobilis D. Assessing the Transmission of Monetary Policy Using Time-varying Parameter Dynamic Factor Models［J］. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics， 2013，75(2):157-179.
[17]Primiceri G E. Time Varying Structural Vector Auto-regressions and Monetary Policy［J］. The Review of Economic Studies， 2005，72(3):821-852.
[18]Cogley T，Sargent T J. Drifts and Volatilities: Monetary Policies and Outcomes in the Post WWII U.S.［J］. Review of Economic Dynamics， 2005，8(2):262-302.
[19]Giordani P，Kohn R. Efficient Bayesian Inference for Multiple Change-point and Mixture Innovation Models［J］. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics， 2008，26(1):66-77.
[20]Koop G，Leon-Gonzales R，Strachan R. On the Evolution of the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism［J］. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control， 2009，33(4):997-1017.
[21]陆军，黄嘉. 利率市场化改革与货币政策银行利率传导［J］. 金融研究， 2021(4):1-18.