Construction of Harmonious Man-machine Interaction Based on Technical Emotions

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.06.005

Abstract

Abstract: Man-machine interaction is one of the hottest topics in the field of artificial intelligence， and the problems， constraints， and development space of man-machine interaction often come from an in-depth understanding of human interaction capability. The core of human interaction capability lies in human emotion ability， and human emotions have both natural and social attributes， representing different levels of value. Therefore， taking the process of human beings' emotional change during man-machine interaction as the research object， a theoretical analysis framework of technical emotions is constructed around negative emotions that may arise during man-machine interaction， such as feelings of domination， attachment personality， technophbia， and deception. Such technical emotional regulation strategies as strengthening interpretability， understanding and respecting boundaries， eliminating the uncanny valley， consolidating trust foundation， and optimizing emotional monitoring are proposed. Targeted avoidance and regulation of many negative technical emotions can help create adaptive， harmonious， natural， and efficient human-machine symbiotic relationships between humans and machines.

Key words: technical emotion; emotional machine; man-machine interaction; emotional regulation; technical value

CLC Number:

N031

HU Jingpu， CHEN Fan. Construction of Harmonious Man-machine Interaction Based on Technical Emotions[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2024, 26(6): 36-43.

References

[1]易显飞，胡景谱. 人工情感技术的不确定性及引导机制构建［J］. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版)， 2023，44(1):124-133.
[2]Frings M S，Scheler M. Gesammelten werke von Max Scheler［M］. Bern: Francke， 1971:99.
[3]王欢欢. 伦理学的“扭转”: 从理性主义走向情感主义——对舍勒早期哲学思想的考察［J］. 东南学术， 2021(6):238-245.
[4]休谟. 道德原则研究［M］. 曾晓平，译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 2002:124.
[5]Hobbes T. The collected English works of Thomas Hobbes［M］. London:Routledge， 1997:72.
[6]帕斯卡尔. 思想录［M］. 何兆武，译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 1985:1-14.
[7]汤波兰，戴茂堂. 为“情感”正名——论舍勒对西方伦理学传统的超越［J］. 伦理学研究， 2018(5):90-97.
[8]费多益. 情绪的内在经验与情境重构——基于心灵哲学的视角［J］. 哲学研究， 2013(11):110-117.
[9]陈凡，徐旭. 后人类时代的技术情感及其伦理反思［J］. 系统科学学报， 2020，28(1):1-5.
[10]Brod C. Technostress: the human cost of the computer revolution［M］. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company， 1984:16.
[11]Nastjuk I，Trang S，Grummeck-Braamt J，et al. Integrating and synthesising technostress research: a meta-analysis on technostress creators，outcomes，and IS usage contexts［J］. European Journal of Information Systems， 2024，33(3):361-382.
[12]Ahn S B. Technophobia and the “techno object-human”: a study on characters of terra formars［J］. Comparative Korean Studies， 2018，26(2):383-411.
[13]Weil M M，Rosen L. The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: a study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from 23 countries［J］. Computers in Human Behavior， 1995，11(1):95-133.
[14]Park S，Straubhaar J D，Strover S L. Exploring ambivalence in technological embeddedness: the role of technological competence and dependence in the information gap［J］. Broadcast Education Association Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media， 2019，63(3):433-454.
[15]Caretti V，Craparo G. Psychopathological issues of technological addiction: new diagnostic criteria for addiction［J］. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine， 2009(7):277-280.
[16]Brey P. Design for the value of human well-being［M］. Dordrecht:Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht， 2015:366-367.
[17]周天策. 共处的“中道”——儿童陪护机器人的伦理风险分析［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2017，33(4):57-62.
[18]Mori M. The uncanny valley［J］. Energy， 1970，7(4):33-35.
[19]杜严勇. 恐怖谷效应探析［J］. 云南社会科学， 2020(3):37-44.
[20]姜英东，尹军. 仿人机器人的心智能力对恐怖谷效应的影响［C］∥第二十三届全国心理学学术会议摘要集: 上. 呼和浩特:中国心理学会， 2021:396-397.
[21]Wallach W，Allen C. Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong［M］. New York: Oxford University Press， 2009:30.
[22]丁晓军，喻丰，许丽颖. 人们对人工智能做道德决策的厌恶感之源及解决之道［J］. 自然辩证法通讯， 2020，42(12):80-86.
[23]Patrick L，Keith A，Bekey G A. Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics［J］. Ethic Theory Moral Prac， 2016，19:546-549.
[24]张文娟，叶惠玲，许晓栎，等. 依恋与人格障碍的关系:维度诊断的新视角［J］. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)， 2018(5):72-82.
[25]Brinck I，Balkenius C. Mutual recognition in human-robot interaction: a deflationary account［J］. Philosophy & Technology， 2020，33:53-70.
[26]吴丹，孙国烨. 迈向可解释的交互式人工智能:动因、途径及研究趋势［J］. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2021，74(5):16-28.
[27]易显飞，胡景谱. 临床“情感增强”实践的权利体系及其伦理向度［J］. 伦理学研究， 2023(1):126-132.
[28]陈万球，付圣莹. 人工智能教育的伦理风险探赜［J］. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)， 2024，39(3):45-52.
[29]王昕迪，胡鹏辉. 边界感:现代社会青年社交需求及其建构［J］. 中国青年研究， 2022(10):72-79.
[30]崔中良. 西方身份建构的情感基础研究［J］. 东北大学学报(社会科学版)， 2023，25(2):17-23.［31］Ekbia H R. Artificial dreams:the quest for non-biological intelligence［M］. New York:Cambridge University Press， 2008.［32］齐佳音，张亚. 人—机器人信任修复与信任再校准研究［J］. 机器人产业， 2021(4):26-38.［33］于雪. 基于机器能动性的人机交互信任建构［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2022，38(10):43-49.［34］胡景谱，陈思. 情感增强的正向价值及其限度［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2022，38(3):115-121.［35］Pitt E，Norton L. “Now that's the feedback I want!” students' reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it［J］. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education， 2016，42(4):99-516.