公众行贿意愿研究来自G省的调查数据

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.04.010

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 390-397.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.04.010

公众行贿意愿研究来自G省的调查数据

孙宗锋¹，高洪成²

(1.中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院，广东广州510275;2.东北大学文法学院，辽宁沈阳110819)

收稿日期:2015-03-18 修回日期:2015-03-18 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
通讯作者: 孙宗锋
作者简介:孙宗锋(1988-)，男，山东临沂人，中山大学博士研究生，主要从事政府绩效评估与组织管理研究;高洪成(1978-)，男，河北唐山人，东北大学副教授，管理学博士，主要从事政府绩效评估与科技政策研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(13&ZD011);辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点资助项目(L12AWJ003);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(11YJC810011)。

Study on the Publics Willingness to Pay BribesBased on the Survey Data of G Province

SUN Zong-feng¹， GAO Hong-cheng²

(1. School of Government， Sun Yat-sen University， Guangzhou 510275， China; 2. School of Humanities & Law， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China)

Received:2015-03-18 Revised:2015-03-18 Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-11-10
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长期以来，学术界对公众行贿导致公职人员腐败的实证研究乏善可陈。基于G省2014年公众腐败感知的问卷调查统计发现，为了办事方便，有30%～44%的公众愿意向公职人员行贿。试图从腐败容忍度、腐败感知程度和腐败经历三个维度来解释个体行贿意愿之间的差异。通过聚类Logit回归模型研究发现，在其他条件不变的情况下，腐败容忍度越高，公众行贿的几率越高;感知到的腐败程度越高，公众行贿的几率就越高;腐败经历显著地提高了公众的行贿几率。

关键词: 腐败感知, 腐败容忍, 腐败经历, 行贿意愿, 聚类Logit回归

Abstract: For a long time， there has been a scarcity of research on officials corruption due to the publics bribing. Based on a survey of G Province in 2014， it was found that for the sake of convenience in conducting business with the government， 30% to 44% people would like to pay bribes. To explore the differences of individuals willingness to pay bribes， three dimensions including corruption tolerance， corruption perception and past corruption experience were constructed. An analysis of the logit regression model found that all the other factors being equal， the higher the publics corruption tolerance is， the more likely they are to pay bribes; the more corruptions the public perceive， the more likely they are to pay bribes; and those who have more corruption experiences are more likely to pay bribes than those not.

Key words: corruption perception, corruption tolerance, corruption experience, willingness to pay bribes, logit regression model

中图分类号:

D668

孙宗锋，高洪成. 公众行贿意愿研究来自G省的调查数据[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(4): 390-397.

SUN Zong-feng， GAO Hong-cheng. Study on the Publics Willingness to Pay BribesBased on the Survey Data of G Province[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2015, 17(4): 390-397.

参考文献

[1]彼得·圣吉. 第五项修炼:学习型组织的艺术与务实［M］. 郭进隆，译. 上海:上海三联书店， 1998:63-74.
[2]Barnett T， Vaicy C. The Moderating Effect of Individuals Perception of Ethical Work Climate on Ethical Judgement and Behavioral Intentions［J］. Journal of Business Ethics， 2000，27(4):351-362.
[3]透明国际公布2013全球贿赂地图:51个国家执政党最腐败［EB/OL］. (2013-07-25)［2015-03-21］. http:∥finance.jrj.com.cn/2013/07/11143915516422-1.shtml.
[4]Cabelkova I， Hanousek J. The Power of Negative Thinking: Corruption， Perception and Willingness to Bribe in Ukraine［J］. Applied Economics， 2004，36:383-397.
[5]Elizabeth A Q. The Logic of Anticorruption Enforcement Campaigns in Contemporary China［J］. Journal of Contemporary China， 2007，16:65-77.
[6]Wu Yiping，Zhu Jiangnan. Corruption， Anti-corruption， and Inter-county Income Disparity in China［J］. The Social Science Journal， 2011，48:435-448.
[7]公婷，吴木銮. 关于以薪养廉有效性的探讨:基于中国的经验［J］. 经济社会体制比较， 2012(5):117-129.
[8]陈刚，李树. 官员任期交流与反腐败［J］. 世界经济， 2012(2):120-142.
[9]万广华，吴一平. 制度建设与反腐败成效:基于跨期腐败程度变化的研究［J］. 管理世界， 2012(4):60-69.
[10]Wedeman A. Double Paradox: Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China［M］. New York: Cornell University Press， 2012.
[11]Wrage A A. Bribery and Extortion: Understanding Business， Governments and Security［M］. Westport: Praeger Security International， 2007.
[12]Torgler B， Valev N T. Corruption and Age［J］. Journal of Bioeconomics， 2006，8(2):133-145.
[13]Nichols P M. The Business Case for Complying with Bribery Laws［J］. American Business Law Journal， 2012，49(2):325-368.
[14]Steildmeier P. Gift Giving， Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management of Business Relationships in China［J］. Journal of Business Ethics， 1999，20(2):121-132.
[15]Tian Qing. Perception of Business Bribery in China: The Impact of Moral Philosophy［J］. Journal of Business Ethics， 2008，80(3):437-445.
[16]Alatas V， Cameron L， Chaudhuri A， et al. Subject Pool Effects in a Corruption Experiment: A Comparison of Indonesian Public Servants and Indonesian Students［J］. Experimental Economics， 2009，12:113-132.
[17]公婷，王世茹. 腐败零容忍的政治文化以香港为例［J］. 复旦公共行政评论， 2012(2):169-186.
[18]Zhu Jiangnan， Lyu Jie， Shi Tianjian. When Grapevine News Meets Mass Media: Different Information Sources and Popular Perceprtions of Government Corruption in Mainland China［J］. Comparative Political Studies， 2013，46(8):920-946.
[19]倪星，孙宗锋. 政府反腐败力度与公众清廉感知:基于G省的实证分析［J］. 政治学研究， 2015(1):71-85.
[20]Hanitzsch T， Berganza R. Explaining Journalists Trust in Public Institutions Across 20 Countries: Media Freedom， Corruption， and Ownership Matter Most［J］. Journal of Communication， 2012，62(5):794-814.
[21]Richard R， William M. Experience Versus Perception of Corruption: Russia as a Test Case［J］. Global Crime， 2010，11(2):145-163.

公众行贿意愿研究来自G省的调查数据

Study on the Publics Willingness to Pay BribesBased on the Survey Data of G Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙宗锋，赵文博，李进涛. 接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(4): 373-380.
[2]	王立华，高芳蕊. 电子政务、腐败感知与民主发展水平——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 268-274.