接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.04.007

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 373-380.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.04.007

接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应

孙宗锋，赵文博，李进涛

(山东大学政治学与公共管理学院，山东青岛266237)

收稿日期:2018-11-06 修回日期:2018-11-06 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-19
通讯作者: 孙宗锋
作者简介:孙宗锋(1988-)，男，山东临沂人，山东大学助理研究员，管理学博士，主要从事廉政与组织理论、大数据等研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(18CGL037);山东省社会科学基金青年资助项目(18DZZJ01)。

The Influence of Contact on Police Performance: The Mediating Effects of Corruption Perception

SUN Zong-feng， ZHAO Wen-bo， LI Jin-tao

(School of Political Science and Public Administration， Shandong University， Qingdao 266237， China)

Received:2018-11-06 Revised:2018-11-06 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-19
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为与警察互动的重要对象之一，公众在评价警察绩效方面有重要的影响。采用SGSS 2017年的数据，通过因子分析识别出公众评估警察绩效的四个维度:合规绩效、业务绩效、可求助性和公平对待。公众与警察的接触是影响警察绩效评价高低的重要因素，用政府腐败感知作为中介变量，将接触对警察绩效评价的影响逻辑理顺。结构方程模型表明:接触次数并不重要，接触性质才是关键因素。相比于被动接触，与警察的主动接触更能提高公民的政府腐败感知程度，进而降低警察绩效评价的水平。腐败感知在被动接触与警察绩效评价之间发挥着部分中介作用，而在主动接触与警察绩效评价之间起到完全中介效应。

关键词: 警察绩效, 腐败感知, 接触, 结构方程模型

Abstract: As the one who interacts with police， the public plays a significant role in police performance evaluation. Using the SGSS data in 2017 and factor analysis， this article identifies four dimensions of public assessment of police performance: legitimate performance， skill performance， responsive performance， and the equity performance. Public contact with the police is an important factor affecting the evaluation of police performance. The article argues that corruption perception， the mediating variable， makes it reasonable why contact has an important effect on police performance. According to the SEM model， the frequency of contact is not so important and the nature of contact matters. Compared with passive contact， active contact with the police can improve citizens' perception of government corruption， and lower the level of police performance evaluation by the public. Corruption perception plays a partial mediating role between passive contact and police performance evaluation， and has a full mediating effect between active contact and police performance evaluation.

Key words: police performance, corruption perception, contact, SEM

中图分类号:

D035

孙宗锋，赵文博，李进涛. 接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(4): 373-380.

SUN Zong-feng， ZHAO Wen-bo， LI Jin-tao. The Influence of Contact on Police Performance: The Mediating Effects of Corruption Perception[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(4): 373-380.

参考文献

[1]Lipsky M. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service［M］. New York: Russell Sage Foundation， 2010.
[2]王舒娜. 警察绩效管理制度创新［J］. 中国行政管理， 2005(12):48-50.
[3]Alalehto T，Larsson D. Measuring Trust in the Police by Contextual and Individual Factors［J］. International Journal of Law Crime & Justice， 2016，46(3):31-42.
[4]Hinds L. Youth， Police Legitimacy and Informal Contact［J］. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology， 2009，24(1):10-21.
[5]Cheurprakobkit S. Police-citizen Contact and Police Performance Attitudinal Differences Between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics［J］. Journal of Criminal Justice， 2000，28(4):325-336.
[6]Zilli L F，Couto V A. Servir e Proteger: Determinantes da Avaliao Pública Sobre a Qualidade do Trabalho das PolCias Militares no Brasil［J］. Sociedade e Estado， 2018，32(3):681-700.
[7]Wu Yuning，Sun I Y. Perceptions of Police: An Empirical Study of Chinese College Students［J］. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management， 2010，33(1):93-113.
[8]Han Ziqiang，Sun I Y，Hu Rong. Social Trust， Neighborhood Cohesion， and Public Trust in the Police in China［J］. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management， 2017，40(2):380-394.
[9]Tavits M. Representation， Corruption， and Subjective Well-being［J］.Comparative Political Studies， 2008，41(12):1607-1630.
[10]Bellman A. Police Service Rating Scale［J］. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology， 1935，26:74.
[11]Parratt S D. Critique of the Bellman Police Service Rating Scale［J］. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology， 1936，27:895.
[12]Legitimacy in Policing［R］. Washington， D. C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services，US Department of Justice， 2013.
[13]Kosar K R. Street Level-bureaucracy: The Dilemmas Endure［J］. Public Administration Review， 2011，71(2):299-302.
[14]Sandfort J R. Moving Beyond Discretion and Outcomes: Examining Public Management from the Front Lines of the Welfare System［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2000，10(4):729-756.
[15]Hupe P，Hill M. Street-level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability［J］. Public Administration， 2007，85(2):279-299.
[16]Ellis K. “Street-level Bureaucracy” Revisited: The Changing Face of Frontline Discretion in Adult Social Care in England［J］. Social Policy & Administration， 2011，45(3):221-244.
[17]董伟玮，李靖. 街头官僚概念的中国适用性:对中国街头官僚概念内涵和外延的探讨［J］. 云南社会科学， 2017(1):26-33.
[18]Gabbidon S L，Higgins G E. The Role of Race/Ethnicity and Race Relations on Public Opinion Related to the Treatment of Blacks by the Police［J］. Police Quarterly， 2009，12(1):102-115.
[19]He Ni，Ren Ling，Zhao Jihong，et al. Public Attitudes Toward the Police: Findings from a Dual-frame Telephone Survey［J］. International journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology， 2017，62(7):1992-2015.
[20]Huebner B M，Schafer J A，Bynum T S. African American and White Perceptions of Police Services［J］. Journal of Criminal Justice， 2004，32(2):123-135.
[21]Cao Liqun. Visible Minorities and Confidence in the Police［J］. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice， 2011，53(1):1-26.
[22]Dowler K，Sparks R. Victimization， Contact with Police， and Neighborhood Conditions［J］. Police Practice & Research， 2008，9(5):395-415.
[23]Chermak S， Scheer C，Wilson J M. Police Consolidation in the News［J］. Police Quarterly， 2014，17(2):150-175.
[24]Tewksbury R，West A. Crime Victims' Satisfaction with Police Services［J］. Criminal Justice Studies， 2001，14(4):271-285.
[25]Scaglion R，Condon R G. Determinants of Attitudes Toward City Police［J］. Criminology， 1980，17(4):485-494.
[26]Preiss J，Ehrlich H J. An Examination of Role Theory: The Case of the State Police［J］.The British Journal of Sociology， 1966，18(1):336.
[27]Sun I Y，Hu Rong，Wong D F，et al. One Country， Three Populations: Trust in Police Among Migrants， Villagers， and Urbanites in China［J］. Social Science Research， 2013，42(6):1737-1749.
[28]Black D，Reiss Jr A J. Patterns of Behavior in Police and Citizen Transactions［J］. Studies in Crime and Law Enforcement in Major Metropolitan Areas， 1967，2:1-139.
[29]Dean D. Citizen Ratings of the Police: The Difference Contact Makes［J］. Law & Policy， 2010，2(4):445-471.
[30]Bordua D J，Tifft L L. Citizen Interviews， Organizational Feedback， and Police-community Relations Decisions［J］. Law & Society Review， 1971，6(2):155.［31］Boda Z，Medve-Bálint G. How Perceptions and Personal Contact Matter: The Individual-level Determinants of Trust in Police in Hungary［J］. Policing and Society， 2017，27(7):732-749.［32］Sun I Y，Wu Yuning，Hu Rong. Public Assessments of the Police in Rural and Urban China A Theoretical Extension and Empirical Investigation［J］. The British Journal of Criminology， 2013，53(4):643-664.［33］Wu Yuning，Triplett R，Sun I Y. Chinese Immigrants' Contact with Police［J］. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management， 2012，35(4):741-760.［34］Mishler W，Rose R. Trust， Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-communist Societies［J］. Journal of Politics， 1997，59(2):418-451.［35］McDonald R P，Ho M H R. Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analyses［J］. Psychological Methods， 2002，7(1):64.

接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应

The Influence of Contact on Police Performance: The Mediating Effects of Corruption Perception

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王立华，高芳蕊. 电子政务、腐败感知与民主发展水平——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 268-274.
[2]	司晓悦，张芳祯，边江. 纳税人满意度影响因素研究——基于S市地税系统的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(4): 392-398.
[3]	宋玉臣，李连伟. 股权激励对上市公司绩效的作用路径——基于结构方程模型(SEM)的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(2): 133-139.
[4]	孙宗锋，高洪成. 公众行贿意愿研究来自G省的调查数据[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(4): 390-397.
[5]	王学工;林良池;张楠;. 城市居民住房偏好的结构——以辽宁省为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2011, 32(5): 426-431.