东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 1-5.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.01.001

• 科技哲学研究 •    下一篇

工程风险感知及其伦理启示探析

闫坤如   

  1. (华南理工大学科学技术哲学研究中心，广东广州510641)
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-20 修回日期:2015-08-20 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 闫坤如
  • 作者简介:闫坤如(1977-)，女，河北保定人，华南理工大学教授，哲学博士，主要从事科技哲学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    广州市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划课题资助项目(15G04)。

Perception of Engineering Risk and Its Implications to Ethics

YAN Kun-ru   

  1. (Research Center for Philosophy of Science and Technology， South China University of Technology， Guangzhou 510641， China)
  • Received:2015-08-20 Revised:2015-08-20 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2016-01-26
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

916

摘要： 工程风险具有客观实在性和主观建构性。不同工程主体对同一工程风险的感知具有差异性，且工程主体的风险感知具有变动性。工程主体因风险性质、风险熟悉程度和风险灾难性程度、风险的不可预测性、不可控性等风险的客观因素，以及主体的风险知识、风险态度、风险认知策略等主观因素导致风险感知差异。因此，要想消除或者缩减风险感知差异，就要从工程师的主体责任伦理、不同工程认知主体间的风险沟通伦理，以及社会稳定评估中的决策伦理等多维视角着手，才能对风险进行合理评估和有效的规避与控制。

关键词: 工程风险, 风险感知, 社会稳定评估, 风险沟通

Abstract: Engineering risks are of objective reality and subjective construction. Different engineering subjects may have varied risk perceptions of the same engineering risk. Furthermore， their risk perceptions are susceptible to change due to such objective factors as risk nature， risk familiarity and disaster degree， risk unpredictability and uncontrollability， and such subjective factors as engineering subjects risk knowledge， attitudes and cognitive strategies. Therefore， in order to eliminate or reduce risk perception differences， such perspectives should be taken as engineers subject responsibility ethics， risk communication ethics among different engineering subjects and decision-making ethics of social stability assessment so as to evaluate risks reasonably and avoid or control risks effectively.

Key words: engineering risk, risk perception, social stability assessment, risk communication

中图分类号: