公众风险感知的影响因素:一个利益与信息的双维审视——来自L市的实证分析

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.01.010

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 73-80.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.01.010

公众风险感知的影响因素:一个利益与信息的双维审视——来自L市的实证分析

王刚¹，徐雅倩²

(1.中国海洋大学国际事务与公共管理学院，山东青岛266100;2.中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院，广东广州510006)

收稿日期:2019-01-07 修回日期:2019-01-07 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-01-19
通讯作者: 王刚
作者简介:王刚(1979-)，男，山东青岛人，中国海洋大学教授，法学博士，主要从事环境风险治理、海洋环境治理、地方政府治理研究;徐雅倩(1995-)，女，山东潍坊人，中山大学博士研究生，主要从事社会治理、数据治理研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(16BZZ079)。

The Influence Factor of Public Perceived Risk:A Two-dimensional Examination from Interest and Information——Based on the Empirical Analysis of L City

WANG Gang¹， XU Ya-qian²

(1. School of International Affairs and Public Administration， Ocean University of China， Qingdao 266100， China; 2. School of Government， Sun Yat-sen University， Guangzhou 510006， China)

Received:2019-01-07 Revised:2019-01-07 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-01-19
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当前学界对公众风险感知影响因素的解释主要落脚于风险本身、行动者主体以及中介载体三个视角，而对利益和信息作用机理的关注有所不足。为此，通过L市实地调研和网络调研所得的791个数据，分析了利益关涉和信息饱和对公众风险感知的影响。结果表明:公众与风险项目的利益关涉不利于风险感知的降低，负面利益关涉的强化会加大公众风险感知;而较为饱和的信息则能够抑制公众的风险感知。进一步考察发现:正面利益会一定程度上消解负面利益对公众风险感知的强化，而与风险相关的知识以及工作背景与风险的相关程度均显著影响公众风险感知。因此，降低公众风险感知的长效机制在于减少风险项目与公众利益的关涉程度，并多途径提高公众的信息饱和度。

关键词: 利益关涉, 信息饱和, 风险感知

Abstract: At present， the explanation of the influencing factors of public risk perception in the academic circle mainly lies in three perspectives: the risk itself， the actors， and the intermediary carriers， but there is insufficient attention to the mechanism of benefits and information. To this end， the impact of interest and information saturation on public risk perception is analyzed through 791 data obtained from field and network surveys in L City. The results show the interest relationship between the public and risk projects is not conducive to the reduction of risk perception; the strengthening of the negative interest relationship will increase the public's risk perception; more saturated information can suppress the public's risk perception. Further investigation has found that positive interests， to some extent， dispel the strengthening of public risk perception by negative interests， and the knowledge related to risk and the degree of correlation between work background and risk significantly affect public risk perception. Therefore， the long-term mechanism to reduce the public risk perception is to reduce the degree of involvement of risk projects and the public interest， and to increase the public's information saturation in multiple ways.

Key words: interest association, information saturation, risk perception

中图分类号:

D035

王刚，徐雅倩. 公众风险感知的影响因素:一个利益与信息的双维审视——来自L市的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(1): 73-80.

WANG Gang， XU Ya-qian. The Influence Factor of Public Perceived Risk:A Two-dimensional Examination from Interest and Information——Based on the Empirical Analysis of L City[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(1): 73-80.

参考文献

[1]关于十九大报告，你必须知道的关键词［EB/OL］. ［2019-01-02］. http:∥www.cssn.cn/zzx/zzbk_zzx/201710/t20171019_3674055.shtml.
[2]肩负好新时代党的历史使命［EB/OL］. ［2019-01-02］. http:∥theory.people.com.cn/n1/2017/1115/c40531-29646669.html.
[3]Cox D F. Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consume Behavior［M］. Boston:Harvard Business， 1967.
[4]侯光辉，王元地. 邻避危机何以愈演愈烈——一个整合性归因模型［J］. 公共管理学报， 2014，11(3):80-92.
[5]Adam B，Beck U，Loon J V. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory［M］. London:Sage Publications， 2000.
[6]Slovic P，Fischhoff B，Lichtenstein S. Rating the Risks［J］. Environment Science & Policy for Sustainable Development， 1981，21(3):14-39.
[7]Flynn J，Slovic P，Mertz C K. Gender， Race， and Perception of Environmental Health Risks［J］. Risk Analysis， 1994，14(6):1101-1108.
[8]Slovic P，Finucane M L，Peters E，et al. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts About Affect， Reason， Risk， and Rationality［J］. Social Science Electronic Publishing， 2004，24(2):311-322.
[9]Finucane M L，Alhakami A，Slovic P，et al. The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits［J］. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making， 2000，13(1):1-17.
[10]Bandura A，Wood R. Effect of Perceived Controllability and Performance Standards on Self-regulation of Complex Decision Making［J］. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology，1989，56(5):805-814.
[11]Rotter J B. Interpersonal Trust， Trustworthiness， and Gullibility［J］. American Psychologist， 1980，35(1):1-7.
[12]李华强，范春梅，贾建民，等. 突发性灾害中的公众风险感知与应急管理——以5·12汶川地震为例［J］. 管理世界， 2009(6):52-60.
[13]张乐，童星. “邻避”冲突管理中的决策困境及其解决思路［J］. 中国行政管理， 2014(4):111-115.
[14]金立印. 服务保证对顾客满意预期及行为倾向的影响——风险感知与价值感知的媒介效应［J］. 管理世界， 2007(8):104-115.
[15]Moser C，Stauffacher M，Krütli P，et al. The Influence of Linear and Cyclical Temporal Representations on Risk Perception of Nuclear Waste: An Experimental Study［J］. Journal of Risk Research， 2012，15(5):459-476.
[16]Rowe G，Wright G. Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk: Myth or Reality?［J］. Risk Analysis， 2001，21(2):341-356.
[17]Stone R N， Grnhaug K. Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline［J］. European Journal of Marketing， 1993，27(3):39-50.
[18]李培林. 社会冲突与阶级意识当代中国社会矛盾研究［J］. 社会， 2005，25(1):7-27.
[19]Choi Y S，Kim J S，Lee B W. Public's Perception and Judgment on Nuclear Power［J］. Annals of Nuclear Energy， 2000，27(4):295-309.
[20]Renn O，Rohrmann B. Cross-cultural Risk Perception［M］. New York: Springer， 2000:11-53.
[21]Weinberg A M. Is Nuclear Energy Acceptable?［J］. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists， 1977，33(4):54-60.
[22]何艳玲，汪广龙. 中国转型秩序及其制度逻辑［J］. 中国社会科学， 2016(6):47-65.
[23]Loewenstein G F，Weber E U，Hsee C K，et al. Risk as Feelings［J］. Psychological Bulletin， 2001，127(2):267-286.
[24]孙晓冬. 收入如何影响中国夫妻的家务劳动分工?［J］. 社会， 2018(5):214-240.
[25]于晓宇，陶向明. 创业失败经验与新产品开发绩效的倒U形关系:创业导向的多重中介作用［J］.管理科学， 2015，28(5):1-14.

公众风险感知的影响因素:一个利益与信息的双维审视——来自L市的实证分析

The Influence Factor of Public Perceived Risk:A Two-dimensional Examination from Interest and Information——Based on the Empirical Analysis of L City

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	樊博，杨文婷，孙轩. 雾霾影响下的公众情绪与风险感知研究——以天津市微博用户为分析样本[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(5): 489-496.
[2]	闫坤如. 工程风险感知及其伦理启示探析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(1): 1-5.