东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 276-282.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.03.009

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市定点类公共服务供给模式及其治理机制研究

王欢明1,诸大建2   

  1. (1.大连理工大学公共管理与法学学院,辽宁大连116024;2.同济大学经济与管理学院,上海200092)
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-12 修回日期:2015-06-12 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 王欢明
  • 作者简介:王欢明(1984),男,江西瑞昌人,大连理工大学讲师,管理学博士,主要从事公共服务绩效与治理研究;诸大建(1953),男,浙江余姚人,同济大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事城市发展与管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71303028);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(DUT15RW103)。

On the Provision Patterns and Governance Mechanisms of Urban Fixed-point Public Service

WANG Huan-ming1, ZHU Da-jian2   

  1. (1. School of Public Administration and Law, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 2. School of Economy and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
  • Received:2015-06-12 Revised:2015-06-12 Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-06-12
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 城市公共服务供给是改善民生的重大任务,其中城市定点类公共服务面临着三层困境:不同类型公共服务在结构配置上的失衡;公共服务在空间上供给的不均衡;公共服务在阶层间分配的差异。该问题的解决,实质上需要定点类公共服务在供给中区分服务安排者和生产者,采用政企、政社、社企、多元主体合作四种供给模式,为提升上述四种供给模式的绩效,需要设计民生资金投入保障机制、生产机制和分配机制。在政企、政社供给模式,需重点关注分配机制,在社企合作制模式中,需要重点关注民生资金投入保障机制,在多元主体合作模式中,需要平衡三种机制之间的关系。

关键词: 城市, 定点类公共服务, 供给模式, 治理机制

Abstract: Supplying public service is aimed at improving peoples well-being. The urban fixed-point public service is now faced with three types of predicaments—the unbalanced distribution in different public service categories, the uneven distribution in different geographical spaces and the unequal distribution in different social classes. To handle these problems, a distinction between planners and producers should be made, and the four kinds of provision patterns should be adopted, which are the collaboration between government and market(G-M), the collaboration between government and social organization(G-S), the collaboration between market and social organization(M-S), and collaboration among government, market and social organization(G-M-S). To improve the performances of these provision patterns, the mechanisms of financial input, production and allocation should be designed. In the patterns of G-M and G-S, more attention should be paid to the allocation mechanism; in the patterns of M-S, more priority should be given to the financial input mechanism; and in the patterns of G-M-S, a balance should be struck among the three mechanisms.

Key words: city, fixed-point public service, provision pattern, governance mechanism

中图分类号: