东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 539-544.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.05.016

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

维特根斯坦语言世界中的意义观从逻辑到语言理解

任蕊1,2，赵夏文3   

  1. (1.吉林大学哲学社会学院，吉林长春130012;2.东北大学外国语学院，辽宁沈阳110819;3.河南工业大学马克思主义学院，河南郑州450001)
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-16 修回日期:2015-01-16 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 任蕊
  • 作者简介:任蕊(1973-)，女，黑龙江庆安人，吉林大学博士研究生，东北大学副教授，主要从事语言哲学和口译研究;赵夏文(1984-)，女，河南郑州人，河南工业大学讲师，哲学博士，主要从事现代西方哲学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省教育厅科学研究资助项目(W2012038);辽宁省社会科学规划基金资助项目(L13DWW011)。

On Wittgensteins Meanging in the Worlds of LanguageFrom Logic to Language Understanding

REN Rui1,2， ZHAO Xia-wen3   

  1. (1. School of Philosophy and Society， Jilin Unversity， Changchun 130012， China; 2. Foreign Studies College， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China; 3. School of Marxism， Henan University of Technology， Zhengzhou 450001， China)
  • Received:2015-01-16 Revised:2015-01-16 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-11-09
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

960

摘要： 语言哲学家维特根斯坦的哲学思想分为前期和后期。与众不同的是，虽然其哲学主题始终是语言，但其前后期哲学观点完全对立，其两个阶段哲学所揭示的语言世界迥异。从研究对象来说，前期的观点是日常语言无意义，是造成混乱的根源，后期的观点则是日常语言有意义且是应当被选择的唯一对象。前期维特根斯坦对于语言世界中的意义持规定的观点，语言世界的意义以逻辑为准绳，逻辑确定语言意义之有无。后期，意义即用法，日常语言的实际使用被以存在即合理的态度全然接受，语言的意义取决于实际的用法，取决于语言使用者对其给出的解释与理解。日常语言世界中意义的最终判据是语言理解。

关键词: 维特根斯坦, 语言世界, 意义, 逻辑, 语言理解

Abstract: Wittgenstein is a philosopher of language， and his philosophy is often divided into the two parts of his early and later philosophies. Different from others， although both are language-centered， his early and later philosophies are of completely opposite positions in having disclosed utterly different worlds of language. Accdemically， everyday language is considered meaningless and is taken as the source of chaos in his early philosophy， while it is not only meaningful but also the only academic choice in his later philosophy. The early one is prescriptive in ideally prescribing language by logic. Logic decides the meaning of language. In his later philosophy， language use decides and is meaning， and the actual use of everyday language is entirely accepted with an attitude similar to what is rational is actual and what is actual is rational. Meaning of language depends on the actual use and what explanation and understanding given by language users. Meaning in the world of everyday language is ultimately determined by language understanding.

Key words: Wittgenstein, world of language, meaning, logic, language understanding

中图分类号: