东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 615-620.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.06.010

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪司法审判的反思与应对

李海滢   

  1. (吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012)
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-10 修回日期:2018-05-10 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 李海滢
  • 作者简介:李海滢(1977-),女,辽宁抚顺人,吉林大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事国际刑法学、犯罪学、法政治学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(17JZD003);吉林大学廉政智库创新团队建设资助项目(2017LZZKY006);吉林省社会科学基金资助项目(2017B88)。

Reflections on and Countermeasures for the Judicial Adjudication of Organizing, Leading, and Participating in the Crimes of the Underworld Organizations

LI Hai-ying   

  1. (School of Law, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
  • Received:2018-05-10 Revised:2018-05-10 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-11-22
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 关于组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪,当前的司法审判主要存在四方面问题,即关于黑社会性质组织前提性犯罪的犯罪圈圈定伸缩性过大;适用没收财产时,没收范围特别是没收数额的确定过于随意;判决书中对没收违法所得的情况明确与否各不相同;普遍未对合法财产与涉黑财产进行区分。因此,法院在审理该罪时,需要首先理顺黑社会性质组织与相关概念之间的关系,并将该组织的四个法定特征有机结合起来,同时注意保护犯罪人的合法财产。

关键词: 黑社会性质组织, 司法审判, 刑事没收

Abstract: Regarding the crime of organizing, leading, and participating in the underworld organizations, there exist four main problems in the current judicial adjudication as follows. The criminal circle of the criminal offense of the underworld organizations is determined too flexibly. When the property is confiscated, the scope of the confiscation, especially the confiscation amount, is decided too freely. In the judgment, the circumstances of illegal income confiscation are stated ambiguously. There is no general distinction between legitimate property and property of the organized crime groups. Therefore, the court in the trial of the crime needs to first straighten out the relationship between the underworld organization and related concepts, and combine the four legal characteristics of the organization while paying attention to protecting the legal property of the offender.

Key words: the underworld organization, judicial adjudication, criminal forfeiture

中图分类号: