东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 187-194.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.02.011

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论国际私法中“优先性强制规则”的性质与适用——以《罗马条例Ⅰ》第9条为视角

黄植蔚   

  1. (北京大学法学院,北京100871)
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-28 修回日期:2018-10-28 出版日期:2019-03-25 发布日期:2019-03-22
  • 通讯作者: 黄植蔚
  • 作者简介:黄植蔚(1991-),男,广东河源人,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事国际私法学研究。

On the Nature and Application of Overriding Mandatory Provisions in the Private International Law——From the Perspective of Article 9 of Rome Ⅰ Regulation

HUANG Zhi-wei   

  1. (Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Received:2018-10-28 Revised:2018-10-28 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-03-22
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 根据《罗马条例Ⅰ》第9条的规定,主权国家在某些情况下承认优先性强制规则的优先效力已经是客观事实,然而学界对优先性强制规则的有关的问题一直争论不休。这种争论长期存在的主要原因是,学者对于这类规则适用的方式过于执着,而没有把注意力放在优先性强制规则是私法性规则的性质上。理论上,优先性强制规则具有了明显的私法色彩,这不仅决定了应该在国际私法学的范畴内讨论相关的问题,而且决定了它在内国具有天然的法律效力。而我国目前还没有关于如何适用外国优先性强制规则的立法,在制定相关法律时立法者应该特别注意到自由裁量权、适用第三国强制性规则的后果和意思自治原则的相关法律问题。

关键词: 国际私法, 优先性强制规则, 法律效力, 《罗马条例Ⅰ》

Abstract: According to stipulations what is stipulated in Article 9 of Rome Ⅰ Regulation, it has already been an objective fact that sovereign states recognize the priority validity of overriding mandatory provisions under certain circumstances. The academic circles have, however, been arguing about relevant problems concerning overriding mandatory provisions all the time. The main reason for of the long-term existence of such dispute is that the scholars are too committed to the applicable methods of such kind of rules rather than instead of focusing on the nature of overriding mandatory provisions being private law rules. In theory effect, overriding mandatory provisions are obviously private law's in nature, which has not only determined that the discussion of relevant problems should be held within the scope of Private International Law,but also determined that they have natural legal effect at home. At present, there is still no legislation on how to apply foreign overriding mandatory provisions in China., When filling relevant legislation, and legislators should pay special much attention to legal issues about discretion, the consequences of applying the mandatory rules of a third state and the principle of the autonomy of will.

Key words: private international law, overriding mandatory provisions, legal effect, Rome Ⅰ Regulation

中图分类号: