翻译共性的解释路径和理论模型刍议

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.05.015

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 114-119.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.05.015

翻译共性的解释路径和理论模型刍议

刘艳春^1,2，胡显耀¹

(1.西南大学外国语学院，重庆400715;2.内蒙古大学外国语学院，内蒙古呼和浩特010070)

收稿日期:2020-01-20 修回日期:2020-01-20 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-09-17
通讯作者: 刘艳春
作者简介:刘艳春(1982-)，男，内蒙古赤峰人，西南大学博士研究生，内蒙古大学讲师，主要从事语料库翻译学、翻译过程研究;胡显耀(1974-)，男，重庆人，西南大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事翻译学、二语习得研究。
基金资助:
重庆市社会科学规划基金资助项目(2018YBYY137);内蒙古自治区教育科学研究“十三五”规划专项课题资助项目(NGHWZ201920);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWU1809007，SWU1709445)。

On the Explanatory Pathways and Theoretical Models for Translation Universals

LIU Yan-chun^1,2， HU Xian-yao¹

(1. College of International Studies， Southwest University， Chongqing 400715， China; 2. Foreign Languages College， Inner Mongolia University， Hohhot 010070， China)

Received:2020-01-20 Revised:2020-01-20 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-09-17
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 过去20多年中，翻译共性的实证研究取得了较大成就，但在对翻译共性的概念界定、理论基础及解释等方面仍存在一些质疑。解释路径和潜在的理论模型是翻译共性研究走向未来的关键一环。对翻译共性的解释主要有三种路径:将外部因素纳入研究范畴的翻译规范说、译者避险说等社会文化路径，将语法隐喻、语域、语言类型等纳入研究的语言学路径，以及关联理论模型、引力假设等译者认知过程路径。通过梳理这些解释路径和理论模型，总结他们对解释翻译共性的贡献及存在的不足，发现跨学科的翻译认知过程路径是目前最有潜力的翻译共性理论模型之一。

关键词: 翻译共性, 社会文化路径, 语言学路径, 认知过程路径

Abstract: In the past two decades， empirical studies on Translation Universals (TU) have made considerable progresses， while still faced with problems and critiques in its conceptualization， theoretical models and explanatory pathways. The explanatory paths and theoretical models are essential to the development of TU hypotheses. There exist three explanatory routes for TUs: social cultural ones， like translation norms and risk-averse models， linguistic ones， combining other linguistic concepts like grammatical metaphor， register， or language typology etc， and translators' cognitive process including relevance theory model and gravity hypothesis. Based on a review of these explanations and models， it could be proposed that the cognitive process approach with an interdisciplinary nature will be a most promising theoretical model for TUs.

Key words: translation universals (TU), social cultural pathway, linguistic pathway, cognitive process pathway

中图分类号:

H059

刘艳春，胡显耀. 翻译共性的解释路径和理论模型刍议[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(5): 114-119.

LIU Yan-chun， HU Xian-yao. On the Explanatory Pathways and Theoretical Models for Translation Universals[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(5): 114-119.

参考文献

[1]Baker M. Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies-Implications and Applications［J］. American Journal of Physiology， 1993，4(1):321-327.
[2]胡显耀. 现代汉语语料库翻译研究［M］. 北京:外文出版社， 2008.
[3]秦洪武，王克非. 基于对应语料库的英译汉语言特征分析［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2009，41(2):131-136.
[4]黄立波，王克非. 语料库翻译学: 课题与进展［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2011，43(6):911-923.
[5]胡显耀，曾佳. 基于语料库的翻译共性研究新趋势［J］. 解放军外国语学院学报， 2011，34(1): 56-62.
[6]许家金. 语料库翻译研究遗珠［J］. 解放军外国语学院学报， 2018，41(2):1-10.
[7]Laviosa S. The Corpus-based Approach: A New Paradigm in Translation Studies［J］. Meta，1998，43(4):474.
[8]Malmkjaer K. Punctuation in Hans Christian Andersen's Stories and in Their Translations into English［M］∥Poyatos F. Nonverbal Communication and Translation: New perspectives and Challenges in Literature， Interpretation and the Media. Philadelphia: Benjamins， 1997:151-162.
[9]Mauranen A. Strange Strings in Translated Language: A Study on Corpora［M］∥Olohan M. Intercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies Ⅰ. Textual and Cognitive Aspects. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing， 2000:119-141.
[10]Xiao R，He Lianzhen，Yue Ming. In Pursuit of the “Third Code”: Using the ZJU Corpus of Translational Chinese in Translation Studies［J］. Zeitschrift Für Physikalische Chemie， 2008，146(2):129-135.
[11]Toury G. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond［M］. Amsterdam: John Benjamins， 2012.
[12]Hermans T. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained［M］. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing， 1999.
[13]Chesterman A. Memes of Translation［M］. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.， 1997.
[14]Pym A. Explaining Explicitation［M］∥Kroly K， Fóris A. New Trends in Translation Studies: In Honour of Kinga Klaudy. Budapest: AkadmiaiKiadó， 2005:29-43.
[15]Simeoni D. The Pivotal Status of the Translator's Habitus［J］. Target， 1998，10(1):1-39.
[16]Bernardini S，Ferraresi A. Practice， Description and Theory Come Together: Normalization or Interference in Italian Technical Translation.［J］. Meta， 2011，56(2):226-246.
[17]庞双子，胡开宝. 翻译共性中的显化问题研究［J］. 现代外语， 2019，42(1):61-71.
[18]Steiner E. Intralingual and Interlingual Versions of a Test-How Specific Is the Notion of “Translation”?［M］∥Steiner E， Yallop C. Exploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content. Berlin: de Gruyter， 2001:161-190.
[19]Teich E. Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text: A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts［M］. Berlin: de Gruyter， 2012.
[20]Delaere I，de Sutter G. Applying a Multidimensional， Register-sensitive Approach to Visualize Normalization in Translated and Non-translated Dutch［J］. Belgian Journal of Linguistics， 2013，27:43-60.
[21]Kruger H，van Rooy B. Register and the Features of Translated Language［J］. Across Languages and Cultures， 2012，13(1):33-65.
[22]Delaere I，de Sutter G. Variability of English Loanword Use in Belgian Dutch Translations. Measuring the Effect of Source Language and Register［M］∥de Sutter G，Lefer M A，Delaere I. Empirical Translation Studies: New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions. Berlin: de Gruyter， 2017:81-112.
[23]Delaere I，de Sutter G，Plevoets K. Is Translated Language More Standardized Than Non-translated Language? Using Profile-based Correspondence Analysis for Measuring Distance Between Language Varieties［J］. Target， 2012，24(2):203-224.
[24]Kruger H. The Effects of Editorial Intervention. Implications for Studies of the Features of Translated Language［M］∥de Sutter G，Lefer M，Delaere I. Empirical Translation Studies: New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions. Berlin: de Gruyter， 2017:113-157.
[25]庞双子，王克非. 翻译文本语体“显化”特征的历时考察［J］. 中国翻译， 2018，39(5):13-20.
[26]庞双子，王克非. 透过翻译的语言接触研究: 翻译文本的“显化”特征对原生文本的历时影响［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2018，50(2):253-267.
[27]胡显耀，曾佳. 对翻译英语中原语干扰的文体统计学分析［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2017，49(4):595-607.
[28]Schwieter J W，Ferreira A. The Handbook of Translation and Cognition［M］. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons， 2017.
[29]Elisabet-Titik M. A Relevance-based Framework for Explicitation and Implicitation in Translation: An Alternative Typology［J］. Trans-kom， 2013，6(2):315-344.
[30]Alves F，Gonalves J. A Relevance Theory Approach to the Investigation of Inferential Processes in Translation［M］∥Alves F. Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins， 2003.［31］Alves F，Gonalves J. Modelling Translator's Competence: Relevance and Expertise Under Scrutiny［M］∥Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress， Lisbon 2004. Amsterdam: John Benjamins， 2007:41-55.［32］Gutt E. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context［M］. Oxford: Blackwell， 2000:203.［33］House J. Suggestions for a New Interdisciplinary Linguo-cognitive Theory in Translation Studies［M］∥Li Defeng， Lai Chenglei， He Yuanjian. Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation. Singapore: Springer， 2019.［34］Halverson S. The Cognitive Basis of Translation Universals［J］. Target， 2003，15(2):197-241.［35］Halverson S. Gravitational Pull in Translation: Testing a Revised Model［M］∥de Sutter G，Lefer M A，Delaere I. Empirical Translation Studies: New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions. Berlin: de Gruyter， 2017:9-47.［36］Hareide L. Is There Gravitational Pull in Translation? A Corpus-based Test of the Gravitational Pull Hypothesis on the Language Pairs Norwegian-Spanish and English-Spanish［M］∥Ji Meng， Hareide L，Li Defeng，et al. Corpus Methodologies Explained: An Empirical Approach to Translation Studies. London: Routledge， 2017:198-241.［37］Muoz E，Calvo N，García M A. Grounding Translation and Interpreting in the Brain: What Has Been，Can Be， and Must Be Done［J］. Perspectives， 2019，27(4):483-509.［38］Martín R M. Reembedding Translation Process Research［M］. Amsterdam: John Benjamins， 2016.

翻译共性的解释路径和理论模型刍议

On the Explanatory Pathways and Theoretical Models for Translation Universals

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晗佶，陈海庆. 技术化时代的翻译伦理研究:挑战与拓展[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(1): 112-119.
[2]	李洋. 论中国译者主体性的现代嬗变——以“五四”翻译潮为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(4): 429-434.
[3]	张继光. 国内翻译研究动态的科学知识图谱分析(2005—2014)基于12种外语类核心期刊的词频统计[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(4): 429-435.
[4]	和静. 不可译论的女性主义重释[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(2): 210-215.
[5]	王少爽. 西方学界翻译过程实证研究的方法论体系[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2012, 14(5): 455-460.