东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 526-531.DOI: -

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论我国“证明责任倒置”规则

包建华   

  1. (大连理工大学公共管理与法学院，大连116024)
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-22 修回日期:2012-04-22 出版日期:2012-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 包建华
  • 作者简介:包建华(1983-)，女，辽宁大连人，大连理工大学讲师，主要从事诉讼法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学规划基金资助项目(L11DSH030);辽宁省社会科学界联合会资助项目(20111SLKRFX-42)。

Research on the Rules of “Reversion of Burden Proof” in China

BAO Jian-hua   

  1. (School of Public Administration and Law， Dalian University of Technology， Dalian 116024， China)
  • Received:2012-04-22 Revised:2012-04-22 Online:2012-11-25 Published:2015-11-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

609

摘要： 我国目前的证明责任倒置规则主要可以归纳为四类:第一，对于消极事实的倒置，主要集中在否认公司人格之诉和著作权侵权之诉当中;第二，对于积极事实的倒置，主要集中在专利侵权之诉和劳动争议当中;第三，对于过错事实的倒置，主要适用于侵权事实发生在被告掌控的场所和被告因为自己的获利行为使大众承受风险的情形;第四，对于因果关系的倒置，主要出现在环境污染和共同危险行为侵权之诉中。我国目前的证明责任倒置规则存在不足，在股东知情权诉讼、关联交易、不当得利和无因管理之诉当中，也应当适用证明责任的倒置。

关键词: 证明责任倒置, 事实, 侵权

Abstract: The current rules for reversion of burden proof in China can be divided into four categories: reversion of negative facts， which mainly occurs in the suit of copyright infringement and denial of corporate status; reversion of positive facts， which mainly occurs in the suit of patent infringement and labor dispute; reversion of faults， which mainly applies to the situation in which the defendant is in charge or the public run a risk because the defendant benefits; and reversion of causality， which mainly happens in the suit of environmental pollution and joint dangerous torts. There are still defects in the laws for reversion of burden proof in China in that such rules should apply to the suit of stockholdersright to know， connected transactions， unjust enrichment and spontaneous agency.

Key words: reversion of burden proof, fact, tort

中图分类号: