露天坑排尾对采空区影响的数学预测及其稳定性

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2017.04.028

东北大学学报:自然科学版 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 591-597.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2017.04.028

露天坑排尾对采空区影响的数学预测及其稳定性

史秀志，陈佳耀，周健，邱贤阳

(中南大学资源与安全工程学院，湖南长沙410083)

收稿日期:2015-12-04 修回日期:2015-12-04 出版日期:2017-04-15 发布日期:2017-04-11
通讯作者: 史秀志
作者简介:史秀志(1966- )，男，河北邢台人，中南大学教授，博士生导师.
基金资助:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAB02B05).

Mathematical Prediction on Effect of Tailing Discharge of Open-Pit on Stability of Underground Mined Out Area

SHI Xiu-zhi， CHEN Jia-yao， ZHOU Jian， QIU Xian-yang

School of Resources and Safety Engineering， Central South University， Changsha 410083， China.

Received:2015-12-04 Revised:2015-12-04 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2017-04-11
Contact: SHI Xiu-zhi
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示露天坑干堆排尾堆高(H)对采空区跨度(D)与境界顶柱高(h)的影响，采用FLAC^3D对不同跨度的双空区在尾砂回填过程中进行开挖模拟，并结合曲线拟合、传统破坏判据及厚度折减法，分别对地下双空区的受力、塑性区及关键点位移等特征进行分析及数学预测.研究表明:当D不变时，拉、压应力及塑性区面积均随H的增大而增加，且在D＞20m后位移变化率明显增大；当H不变时，监测位移和塑性区随D增大而增加，且定量预测出D=26m时，上下空区临界破坏对应的H分别为182.44，189.85m.当D与H均变化时，双空区的塑性区逐渐呈现“蝴蝶状”，上部空区的塑性区域明显大于下部，且在D＞20m，H＞150m时，上部空区出现与露天坑底贯穿现象.

关键词: 露天坑排尾, 双空区, 境界顶柱, 数值模拟, 数学预测

Abstract: To reveal the impact of the height of the tailing dry stacked gangue (H) on the span of double gob area (D) and the roof thickness (h)， the simulation software FLAC^3D was used to simulate the excavation process of the double gob area of different spans during the tailing-backfilling process. The stress， plastic zones and the displacement of monitoring points of double gob area were analyzed by combining with the hyperbolic fitting equations， traditional failure criterion and the thickness reduction methods. When D is kept constant， tensile and compressive stress and the plastic zone area increase with the increase of H， and the displacement of all monitoring points increase significantly when the span is larger than 20m. When H is kept constant， the displacement and the plastic zone area increase with the increase of D， and it can be quantitatively predicted that when the span is up to 26m， the critical damage height of tailing dry stacked gangue is 182.44 and 189.85m， respectively. When D and H are changed， the plastic zones of the double gob area take on a butterfly-shape， and the plastic zone area of the upper gob is greater than that of the lower part. A cutting-through failure will occur when the span exceeds 20m and the tailing height exceeds 150m.

Key words: tailing discharge into open-pit, double gob area, boundary pillar, numerical simulation, mathematical prediction

中图分类号:

TD325

史秀志，陈佳耀，周健，邱贤阳. 露天坑排尾对采空区影响的数学预测及其稳定性[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 38(4): 591-597.

SHI Xiu-zhi， CHEN Jia-yao， ZHOU Jian， QIU Xian-yang. Mathematical Prediction on Effect of Tailing Discharge of Open-Pit on Stability of Underground Mined Out Area[J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2017, 38(4): 591-597.

参考文献

[1]林杭，曹平，李江腾，等.采空区临界安全顶板预测的厚度折减法［J］.煤炭学报，2009，34(1):53-57.(Lin Hang，Cao Ping，Li Jiang-teng，et al.The thickness reduction method in forecasting the critical safety roof thickness of gob area ［J］.Journal of China Coal Society，2009，34(1):53-57.)
[2]吴启红，彭振斌，陈科平，等.矿山采空区稳定性二级模糊综合评判［J］.中南大学学报(自然科学版)，2010，41(2):661-667.(Wu Qi-hong，Peng Zhen-bin，Chen Ke-ping，et al.Synthetic judgment on two-stage fuzzy of stability of mine gob area［J］. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology)，2010，41(2):661-667.)
[3]张耀平，曹平，袁海平，等.复杂采空区稳定性数值模拟分析［J］.采矿与安全工程学报，2010，27(2):233-238.(Zhang Yao-ping，Cao Ping，Yuan Hai-ping，et al.Numerical simulation on stability of complicated goaf ［J］.Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering，2010，27(2):233-238.)
[4]叶振华.露天采场排放尾矿后下部矿体开采安全性研究［J］.矿冶，2006，15(4):9-12，26.(Ye Zhen-hua，Study on safety of lower deposit mining under the condition of discharging tailings in the upper strip pit ［J］.Mining & Metallurgy，2006，15(4):9-12，26.)
[5]王新民，赵建文，张钦礼，等.露天转地下最佳开采模式［J］.中南大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，43(4):1434-1439.(Wang Xin-min，Zhao Jian-wen，Zhang Qin-li，et al.Mining model of transition from open-pit to underground mining［J］.Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology)，2012，43(4):1434-1439.)
[6]Duncan J M.State of the art limit equilibrium and finite element analysis of slopes ［J］.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，ASCE，1996，122(7):577-596.
[7]Zhang H R.Researches and applications on geostatistical simulation and laboratory modeling of mine ventilation network and gas drainage zone ［J］.Process Safety and Environmental Protection，2015，94:55-64.
[8]史秀志，黄刚海，张舒，等.基于FLAC^3D的复杂条件下露天转地下开采空区围岩变形及破坏特征［J］.中南大学学报(自然科学版)，2011，42(6):1710-1718.(Shi Xiu-zhi，Huang Gang-hai，Zhang Shu，et al.Goaf surrounding rock deformation and failure features using FLAC^3Din underground mining shifted from open-pit in complex situation［J］.Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology)，2011，42(6):1710-1718.)
[9]Zhou J，Li X B.Identification of large-scale goaf instability in underground mine using particle swarm optimization and support vector machine ［J］. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology，2013，23(5):701-707.
[10]Nomikos P P，Sofianos A I，Tsoutrelis C E.Structural response of vertically multi-jointed roof rock beams［J］.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2002，39(1):79-94.
[11]Yu Z Y，Yang S Q，Qin Y，et al.Experimental study on the goaf flow field of the “U+I”type ventilation system for a comprehensive mechanized mining face ［J］.International Journal of Mining Science and Technology，2015，25(6):1003-1010.
[12]Deng Q W，Liu X H，Lu C，et al.Numerical simulation of spontaneous oxidation zone distribution in goaf under gas stereo drainage ［J］.Procedia Engineering，2013，52:72-78.
[13]Hao T X，Jin Z C，Li F.Optimization of goaf gas drainage parameters based on numerical simulation studying fracture in overlying strata ［J］.Procedia Engineering，2012，43:269-275.
[14]Qin Z Y，Yuan L，Guo H，et al.Investigation of longwall goaf gas flows and borehole drainage performance by CFD simulation ［J］.International Journal of Coal Geology，2015，150/151:51-63.
[15]Xu P，Mao X B，Zhang M X，et al.Safety analysis of building foundations over old goaf under additional stress from building load and seismic actions ［J］. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology，2014，24(5):713-718.
[16]Qin Y P，Liu W，Yang W W，et al.Numerical simulation study of spontaneous combustion in goaf based on non-Darcy seepage ［J］.Procedia Engineering，2011，26:486-494.
[17]Li Z X，Lu Z L，Wu Q，et al.Numerical simulation study of goaf methane drainage and spontaneous combustion coupling ［J］.Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2007，17(4):503-507.
[18]Li Z X，Huang Z A，Zhang A R，et al.Numerical analysis of gas emission rule from a goaf of tailing roadway ［J］.Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2008，18(2):164-167.
[19]He X G，Zhang R W，Pei X D，et al.Numerical simulation for determining three zones in the goaf at a fully-mechanized coal face ［J］. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2008，18(2):199-203.

露天坑排尾对采空区影响的数学预测及其稳定性

Mathematical Prediction on Effect of Tailing Discharge of Open-Pit on Stability of Underground Mined Out Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱庆丰，闫渤，冯志鑫，左玉波. 2195铝合金不同速度热轧过程数值模拟及实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 44(4): 502-509.
[2]	赵文，孙远，柏谦，夏云朋. 小直径管幕工法横导洞施工现场试验及参数优化[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 44(3): 432-439.
[3]	吴飞，李亦能，王梦辉. 陶瓷3D打印挤出光固化辅助成型工艺研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(9): 1283-1290.
[4]	袁阳，徐涛，周广磊，勒治华. 基于微平面模型和正则化的脆性岩石损伤破裂模拟方法[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(8): 1141-1148.
[5]	李雪娇，杨洪英，赵鹤飞，胡红胜. 铝电解槽集气结构的数值模拟研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(7): 966-972.
[6]	吕超，孙铭赫，殷宏鑫，刘芳. 文丘里热解反应器结构对流场影响的模拟研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(6): 821-826.
[7]	侯端旭，魏德洲，崔宝玉，赵强. 进料体积分数对旋流分离柱分离性能的影响[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(5): 718-723.
[8]	安龙，张家华，李元辉，韩琳. 急倾斜薄矿脉夹制作用下中深孔爆破模拟与参数优化[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(4): 567-574.
[9]	李宝宽，欧海彬，于洋，李孟臻. 钛渣电弧炉中的多物理场和还原反应模型[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(2): 206-213.
[10]	郝博，代浩，吕超. 入水角度对高速射弹入水过程的影响[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(2): 221-227.
[11]	赵勐，肖明，陈俊涛，左双英. 考虑互层状岩体接触状态的地下洞室围岩稳定分析[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(2): 243-250.
[12]	王鑫，赵文，柏谦. 原位扩建既有隧道主洞与竖井交叉段扩建型式[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(10): 1469-1476.
[13]	张晓虎，张晟，赵亮，董辉. 烧结镁砂煅烧竖炉内气固传热特性数值分析[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(1): 40-47.
[14]	李刚，康瑾，崔震，胡朋. 粉尘隔爆翻板阀功能实验与模拟研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(8): 1166-1173.
[15]	李天祥，李海军，王昭东，王国栋. 热芯大压下轧制厚板坯缩孔及表面开裂的数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(7): 913-919.