理解政策设计:一个初步的分析框架

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.007

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 52-58.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.007

理解政策设计:一个初步的分析框架

高进¹，郭爱平²，霍丽婷¹

(1.东北大学文法学院，辽宁沈阳110169;2.厦门大学公共政策研究院，福建厦门361005)

收稿日期:2021-04-25 修回日期:2021-04-25 接受日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2022-11-26
通讯作者: 高进
作者简介:高进(1978-)，男，辽宁大连人，东北大学副教授，政治学博士，主要从事公共管理研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(22BZZ028)。

Understanding Policy Design: A Preliminary Analytical Framework

GAO Jin¹， GUO Aiping²， HUO Liting¹

(1. School of Humanities & Law， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110169， China; 2. School of Public Policy， Xiamen University， Xiamen 361005， China)

Received:2021-04-25 Revised:2021-04-25 Accepted:2021-04-25 Published:2022-11-26
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 政策设计是公共政策研究的热点主题，已有的社会建构论、工具组合论和创新管理论等分析框架，为公共场域的政策设计提供分析范式，但也有各自解释局限。通过构建政策设计的目标群体—主体—焦点—方法分析框架，比较政策设计与政策设置的本质差异，突出政策设计的目标群体导向。阐释政府作为政策设计主体与设计参与者等设计联盟的关系，论述政策设计焦点主要关注设计过程中工具的使用及组合安排、设计时间与空间、设计思维问题。政策设计采用工具甄别筛选法、聚焦群体法和创新设计法，主要应用于国家和地区重大决策、区域特定环境和知识联动领域。深刻把握政策设计的分析框架和应用启示，有利于增强中国场景的公共政策顶层设计和宏观规划能力。

关键词: 政策设计; 政策设置; 设计焦点

Abstract: Policy design is a hot topic of public policy research. The existing analytical frameworks， such as social construction theory， tools combination theory and innovation management theory， provide analytical paradigms for policy design in the public field， but they also have their own interpretation limitations. By constructing the target group-subject-focus-method analysis framework of policy design， the essential differences between policy design and policy setting are compared， and the target group-orientation of policy design is highlighted. This paper expounds the design alliance relationship between the government and the participants of policy design， and discusses the focuses on the use and arrangement of tools， design time and space， and design thinking issues in the design process. It adopts tool screening method， focused group method and innovative design method， which are mainly applied to major national and regional decision-making， regional specific environment and knowledge linkage fields. We should grasp the analytical framework and application inspiration of policy design， and enhance the top-level design and macro planning ability of public policy in the Chinese scenario.

Key words: policy design; policy setting; design focus

中图分类号:

D630

高进，郭爱平，霍丽婷. 理解政策设计:一个初步的分析框架[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(6): 52-58.

GAO Jin， GUO Aiping， HUO Liting. Understanding Policy Design: A Preliminary Analytical Framework[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2022, 24(6): 52-58.

参考文献

[1]Ingram H，Schneider A L，DeLeon P. Social Construction and Policy Design［J］. Theories of the Policy Process， 2007(2): 93-126.
[2]Howlett M，Del Rio P. The Parameters of Policy Portfolios: Verticality and Horizontality in Design Spaces and Their Consequences for Policy Mix Formulation［J］. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy， 2015，33(5):1233-1245.
[3]Howlett M，Mukherjee I，Woo J J. From Tools to Toolkits in Policy Design Studies: the New Design Orientation Towards Policy Formulation Research［J］. Policy & Politics， 2015，43(2):291-311.
[4]Kern F，Howlett M. Implementing Transition Management as Policy Reforms: a Case Study of the Dutch Energy Sector［J］. Policy Sciences， 2009，42(4):391-408.
[5]李文钊. 民主的政策设计理论: 探究政策过程中的社会建构效应［J］. 学海， 2019(1):151-162.
[6]Hobday M，Boddington A，Grantham A. Policies for Design and Policies for Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives and Remaining Challenges［J］. Technovation， 2012，32(5):272-281.
[7]朱亚鹏，李斯旸. 目标群体社会建构与政策设计框架: 发展与述评［J］. 中山大学学报(社会科学版)， 2017，57(5):163-172.
[8]朱伟. 西方政策设计理论的复兴、障碍与发展［J］. 南京社会科学， 2018(5):75-81.
[9]Schneider A，Ingram H. Systematically Pinching Ideas:a Comparative Approach to Policy Design［J］. Journal of Public Policy， 1988，8(1):61-80.
[10]Linder S H，Peters B G. The Analysis of Design or the Design of Analysis?［J］. Review of Policy Research， 1988，7(4):738-750.
[11]Howlett M，Lejano R P. Tales from the Crypt: the Rise and Fall (and Rebirth?) of Policy Design［J］. Administration & Society， 2013，45(3):357-381.
[12]Peters G B. Advanced Introduction to Public Policy［M］. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing， 2015.
[13]Cobb R W，Elder C D. The Politics of Agenda-building: an Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory［J］. The Journal of Politics， 1971，33(4):892-915.
[14]Howlett M，Newman J. Policy Analysis and Policy Work in Federal Systems: Policy Advice and Its Contribution to Evidence-based Policy-making in Multi-level Governance Systems［J］. Policy and Society， 2010，29(2):123-136.
[15]Haelg L，Sewerin S，Schmidt T S. The Role of Actors in the Policy Design Process: Introducing Design Coalitions to Explain Policy Output［J］. Policy Sciences， 2020，53(2):309-347.
[16]Yi H，Feiock R C. Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards［J］. Review of Policy Research， 2012，29(2):193-206.
[17]Capano G，Howlett M. The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes［J］. SAGE Open， 2020，10(1):1-13.
[18]Howlett M，Rayner J. Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Complementary Effects， Goodness of Fit， Degrees of Freedom， and Feasibility in Policy Portfolio Design［J］. Annual Review of Policy Design， 2013，1(1):1-19.
[19]Hoppe R. Heuristics for Practitioners of Policy Design: Rules-of-thumb for Structuring Unstructured Problems［J］. Public Policy and Administration， 2018，33(4):384-408.
[20]Hedegaard T F. The Policy Design Effect: Proximity as a Micro-level Explanation of the Effect of Policy Designs on Social Benefit Attitudes［J］. Scandinavian Political Studies， 2014，37(4):366-384.
[21]Howlett M. The Criteria for Effective Policy Design: Character and Context in Policy Instrument Choice［J］. Journal of Asian Public Policy， 2018，11(3):245-266.
[22]Howlett M，Rayner J. Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in New Governance Arrangements［J］. Policy and Society， 2007，26(4):1-18.
[23]Howlett M. Governance Modes， Policy Regimes and Operational Plans: a Multi-level Nested Model of Policy Instrument Choice and Policy Design［J］. Policy Sciences， 2009，42(1):73-89.
[24]Pierce J J，Siddiki S，Jones M D，et al. Social Construction and Policy Design: a Review of Past Applications［J］. Policy Studies Journal， 2014，42(1):1-29.
[25]Considine M. Thinking Outside the Box? Applying Design Theory to Public Policy［J］. Politics & Policy， 2012，40(4):704-724.
[26]Skodvin T，Gullberg A T，Aakre S. Target-group Influence and Political Feasibility: the Case of Climate Policy Design in Europe［J］. Journal of European Public Policy， 2010，17(6):854-873.
[27]Voss J P，Smith A，Grin J. Designing Long-term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management［J］. Policy Sciences， 2009，42(4):275-302.
[28]McGann M，Blomkamp E，Lewis J M. The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy［J］. Policy Sciences， 2018，51(3):249-267.
[29]Blake A P，Kirsanova T. A Note on Timeless Perspective Policy Design［J］. Economics Letters， 2004，85(1):9-16.
[30]Maor M. The Implications of the Emerging Disproportionate Policy Perspective for the New Policy Design Studies［J］. Policy Sciences， 2017，50(3):383-398.［31］Chindarkar N. Beyond Power Politics: Evaluating the Policy Design Process of Rural Electrification in Gujarat， India［J］. Public Administration and Development， 2017，37(1):28-39.［32］Capano G，Woo J J. Designing Policy Robustness: Outputs and Processes［J］. Policy and Society， 2018，37(4):422-440.

理解政策设计:一个初步的分析框架

Understanding Policy Design: A Preliminary Analytical Framework

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹惠民. 我国公共安全风险治理的话语转向与绩效观照[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(6): 69-75.
[2]	胡平，李兆友. 基层嵌入式扶贫的形式主义困境与精准治理——基于20起扶贫领域形式主义典型案例的分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(5): 56-64.
[3]	张兴，卓越. 循证视角下政府工作人员使用学术成果的影响因素分析——基于多层线性模型[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 58-66.
[4]	张玉强，张雷. 乡村振兴内源式发展的动力机制研究——基于上海市Y村的案例考察[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(5): 497-504.
[5]	吕维霞，贺天. 公务员职务与职级并行制对基层公务员激励效果的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 251-260.
[6]	王立华，高芳蕊. 电子政务、腐败感知与民主发展水平——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 268-274.
[7]	吕维霞，徐晓明，王超杰. 基层公务员职业倦怠感评价指标及影响因素研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(5): 475-482.
[8]	周赟，赵晖. 集团腐败组织运行的驱动机制研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(3): 269-276.
[9]	路稳玲，魏淑艳. 互联网背景下地方政府治理创新的过程、模式及影响因素——以网约车治理为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(1): 66-72.
[10]	曲纵翔. 政策终结系统动力及建模基于耗散结构论的解释[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(1): 49-55.
[11]	曾琰. 在“人本”与“物本”之间:系统信任的价值分野及融合[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(5): 508-514.
[12]	王欢明，诸大建. 城市定点类公共服务供给模式及其治理机制研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(3): 276-282.
[13]	赵蕾. 交通拥挤收费研究基于政策基础的可行性分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(3): 282-287.
[14]	李兆友，董健. 政府创新的内部障碍及其超越[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(2): 162-168.
[15]	张志刚. 事业单位去行政化改革的文化分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(1): 56-62.