东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 80-88.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.03.009

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂适应性视域下城市治理数字化的实践逻辑——北京“接诉即办”和上海“一网统管”案例的比较分析

赵吉1,成小琴2   

  1. (1.上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030;2.中共北京市委党校政治学教研部,北京100044)
  • 发布日期:2024-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 赵吉
  • 作者简介:赵吉(1993-),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,上海交通大学助理教授,管理学博士,主要从事城市治理、公共政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(22&ZD171)。

Practical Logic of Urban Governance Digitization from the Perspective of Complex Adaptability: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of “Responding to Complaints Immediately” in Beijing and “Unified Management with One Network” in Shanghai

ZHAO Ji1, CHENG Xiaoqin2   

  1. (1. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; 2. Teaching Department of Politics, Party School of Beijing Committee of CPC, Beijing 100044, China)
  • Published:2024-05-31
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 城市治理数字化受到复杂环境和府际关系的影响,表现出差异化的实践逻辑。基于复杂适应系统分析框架,城市治理数字化实践是为应对外部复杂问题而展开的政府内部变革,并在一系列相互作用过程中涌现出的结果。“接诉即办”立足民众诉求及问题解决的现实场景,通过充分利用数字技术,实现全流程的数字化赋能,并带动城市治理的整体数字化。“一网统管”整体上回应超大城市治理中的效能短板,通过整合城市海量数据实现整体智治,并通过对政府数字治理体系的多层次搭建实现对城市治理体系的覆盖,从而推动城市治理全场景的数字化升级。两案例都体现出城市治理数字化转型的复杂适应性特征,但聚焦的城市治理问题切口不同,展现出的组织变革和流程再造逻辑也存在差异。

关键词: 城市治理; 数字化转型; 复杂适应系统; 接诉即办; 一网统管

Abstract: Urban governance digitization is affected by complex environments and inter-government relationships, which shows the practical logic of business trip alienation. Based on the analysis framework of the complex adaptive system, the digital practice of urban governance is the result of the internal reform of the government to deal with the complex external problems and emerges from a series of interaction processes. Based on the actual scene of public demands and problem solving, “responding to complaints immediately” promotes the digitalization of the whole process and drives the overall digitalization of urban governance by making full use of digital technology. “Unified management with one network” responds to the shortcomings of mega-city governance on the whole, realizes the overall intelligent governance by integrating the massive urban data, and achieves the coverage of urban governance system by building the multi-level government digital governance system, so as to promote the digital upgrading of the whole scene of urban governance. Both cases reflect the complex adaptability characteristics of the digital transformation of urban governance, but differences do exist such as the focus of urban governance problems and the logics of organizational change as well as process reengineering.

Key words: urban governance; digital transformation; complex adaptive system; responding to complaints immediately; unified management with one network

中图分类号: