CISG优先适用法律模式探析——兼评我国国际商事条约适用立法及司法实践

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.04.013

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 97-103.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.04.013

CISG优先适用法律模式探析——兼评我国国际商事条约适用立法及司法实践

杨梦莎

(天津大学法学院，天津300072)

收稿日期:2019-10-20 修回日期:2019-10-20 出版日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2020-07-29
通讯作者: 杨梦莎
作者简介:杨梦莎(1989-)，女，河南安阳人，天津大学讲师，法学博士，主要从事国际经济法研究。
基金资助:
天津大学自主创新基金资助项目(2019XSC-0022)。

An Analysis on Legal Models of CISG' Preemptive Application ——A Concurrent Discussion on Legislation and Judicial Practice of Application of International Commercial Treaties in China

YANG Meng-sha

(Law School， Tianjin University， Tianjin 300072， China)

Received:2019-10-20 Revised:2019-10-20 Online:2020-07-25 Published:2020-07-29
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际商事条约的统一法宗旨决定了其具有优先于国内法适用的法律规则。以《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》为典型，其优先适用规则具有明确的国际法依据。而国内法层面如何处理国际商事条约与国内法之间的法律冲突，直接影响了法官优先适用国际商事条约的效果和程度。该公约主要缔约国从本国已有宪法、立法、司法制度及法律原则出发，通过不同的法律路径实现了该公约的优先适用。目前我国司法实践仍存在适用《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的分散和混乱状态，亟需通过加强立法供给和司法指导，明晰国际商事条约与国内法的法律适用关系。

关键词: 《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》, 统一法, 优先适用, 法律模式

Abstract: The purposes of the uniform law of international commercial treaties determine their legal rules of preemptive application to domestic law. Taking the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(CISG) as a typical example， its preemptive application rules have a clear legal basis in international law. While on domestic law level， how to deal with the legal conflicts between international commercial treaties and domestic law， directly affects the effect and degree of the judges' actual application of international commercial treaties. The main contracting parties of the Convention have implemented the preemptive application of the Convention through different legal paths based on their own constitutional， legislative， judicial and legal principles. Nowadays there is still scattered and chaotic application of Convention in judicial practice in China， so it is urgent to clarify the relationship between international commercial treaties and domestic law by strengthening the supply of legislation and judicial guidance.

Key words: CISG, uniform law, preemptive application, legal models

中图分类号:

DF961

杨梦莎. CISG优先适用法律模式探析——兼评我国国际商事条约适用立法及司法实践[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 97-103.

YANG Meng-sha. An Analysis on Legal Models of CISG' Preemptive Application ——A Concurrent Discussion on Legislation and Judicial Practice of Application of International Commercial Treaties in China[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 97-103.

参考文献

[1]Karton J，Germiny L. Has the CISG Advisory Council Come of Age?［J］. Berkeley Journal of International Law， 2009，27(2):448-495.
[2]刘瑛. 论国际商事法律协调［J］. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版)， 2018，20(5):20-29.
[3]Fevrars F. The CISG and Its Impact on National Legal Systems［M］. Munich: Sellier European Law Publisher， 2008.
[4]程家瑞. 国际条约和习惯法对商事法国际化的影响［M］∥沈四宝，王军. 国际商法论丛. 北京: 法律出版社， 1999:11.
[5]Koehler M，Guo Yujun. The Acceptance of the Unified Sales Law (CISG) in Different Legal Systems: An International Comparison of Three Surveys on the Exclusion of the CISG's Application Conducted in the United States， Germany and China［J］. Pace International Law Review， 2008，20(1):45-60.
[6]Huber P. Typically German? —Two German Contributions to the CISG［J］. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade-International Edition， 2011(2011):150-161.
[7]李浩培. 条约法概论［M］. 北京:法律出版社， 2003.
[8]van Alstine M P. Federal Common Law in an Age of Treaties［J］. Cornell Law Review， 2004，89(4):922-925.
[9]Olazabal A M，Emerson R W，Turner K D，et al. Global Sales Law: An Analysis of Recent CISG Precedents in US Courts 2004-2012［J］. Business Lawyer， 2012，67(4):1351-1384.
[10]彭岳. 国际条约在国内适用中的制度僵化及其解决［J］. 中国法学， 2014(4):286-302.
[11]Xiao Yongping，Long Weidi. Selected Topics on the Application of the CISG in China［J］. Pace International Law Review， 2008，20(1):61-104.
[12]Heidemann M. Methodology of Uniform Contract Law—The UNIDROIT Principles in International Legal Doctrine and Practice［M］. Berlin: Springer-Verlag， 2007.
[13]李旺. 论国际民商事条约的适用——以国际民商事条约与国际私法的关系为视角［J］. 法学家， 2017(4):107-115.
[14]陈卫佐. 法院地国家国内法中的冲突规则与国际条约的关系［J］. 法学研究， 2013(2):173-189.
[15]赵建文. 国际条约在中国法律体系中的地位［J］. 法学研究， 2010(6):190-206.

CISG优先适用法律模式探析——兼评我国国际商事条约适用立法及司法实践

An Analysis on Legal Models of CISG' Preemptive Application ——A Concurrent Discussion on Legislation and Judicial Practice of Application of International Commercial Treaties in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	司玉琢，袁曾. 建立海外军事基地的国际法规制研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(2): 189-196.
[2]	任宪龙，韩立新. 论私营海上武装保安抗击海盗使用武力的权源与标准[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(6): 625-630.
[3]	张文哲，张虎. 论外国商事仲裁中的律师送达[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(5): 521-526.