Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 606-612.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.06.010

• Politics and Public Management • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Policy Implementation Collusion of Rural Subsistence Allowances Illustrated by C Township in Mid-Shandong

WANG Hui, CUI Xin-xin   

  1. (School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China)
  • Received:2015-04-25 Revised:2015-04-25 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-25
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

Abstract: GuanxiBao and RenqingBao in implementing rural subsistence allowances are viewed as rural governance tolls by most scholars after the tax reform. However, another sort of policy implementation variation is revealed through the case study of rural subsistence allowances in C Town, Shandong Province, where many village cadres tend to prompt the low-income families that if they want to receive subsistence allowances from the government they should return some subsidies to the cadres as an exchange reward. The inherent defect of subsistence allowances offers the possibility of such collusion. By establishing the patron system, village cadres can easily manipulate the low-income recipients. In turn, villagers can also game and choose a preferred delivery strategy for more profit. As a result the two sides may reach collusion. Finally, the current patron system and that in the collectivization period is compared, which indicates that the subsistence allowance publicity system helps to resolve the emergence of collusion.

Key words: rural subsistence allowance, policy implementation alienation, collusion behavior, patron system, game mechanism

CLC Number: