On the Security Risks of Universal Home-used Intelligent Robots

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.03.002

Abstract

Abstract: With the rise of artificial intelligence， universal intelligent robots are rapidly developing and gradually entering ordinary households. In view of their powerful presupposition， universal intelligent robots often need to collect family information， intervene in family life or even play a family role to bring convenience to family life and may also lead to security risks of information privacy， life and property， and moral ethics. These risks include the conventional risks of any product due to its instrumentality， the distinctive risks posed by the functional positioning of robots， and the growth risks associated with robot intelligence. Therefore， in affirming the advantages of smart home-used intelligent robot technology， every effort should be made to eliminate or reduce its potential security risks by enhancing information security， promoting intrinsic safety and paying attention to human-computer harmony.

Key words: intelligent robot, universal home-used, artificial intelligence, security risk, ethics

CLC Number:

N031

YAN Guo-hua， YAN Chen. On the Security Risks of Universal Home-used Intelligent Robots[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2018, 20(3): 227-232.

References

[1]林命彬. 哲学视角下智能机器在自我意识和行为意义上的突破［J］. 黑龙江社会科学， 2016(6):8-14.
[2]龚怡宏. 人工智能是否终将超越人类智能——基于机器学习与人脑认知基本原理的探讨［J］. 人民论坛， 2016(7):12-21.
[3]维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格，肯尼思·库克耶. 大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革［M］. 盛杨燕，周涛，译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社， 2013:38.
[4]杜严勇. 机器伦理刍议［J］. 科学技术哲学研究， 2016，33(1):96-101.
[5]Payr S. Towards Human-robot Interaction Ethics［M］. Berlin: Springer International Publishing， 2015:33.
[6]李小燕. 从实在论走向关系论:机器人伦理研究的方法论转换［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2016，32(2):40-44.
[7]于雪，王前. “机器伦理”思想的价值与局限性［J］. 伦理学研究， 2016(4):109-114.
[8]李小燕. 老人护理机器人伦理风险探析［J］. 东北大学学报(社会科学版)， 2015，17(6):561-566.
[9]王绍源. 应用伦理学的新兴领域:国外机器人伦理学研究述评［J］.自然辩证法通讯， 2016，38(4):147-151.
[10]李俊平. 关于约束人工智能情感的思考［J］. 科协论坛， 2013(1):85-87.
[11]任晓明，王东浩. 机器人的当代发展及其伦理问题初探［J］.自然辩证法研究， 2013，29(6):113-118.
[12]杜严勇. 情侣机器人对婚姻与性伦理的挑战初探［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2014，30(9):93-98.
[13]Ller V C. Introduction: Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence［J］. Minds and Machines， 2012，22(2):67-69.
[14]Coeckelbergh M. Moral Appearances: Emotions， Robots， and Human Morality［J］. Ethics & Information Technology， 2010，12(3):235-241.
[15]约瑟夫·巴科恩，大卫·汉森. 机器人革命:即将到来的机器人时代［M］. 潘俊，译. 北京:机械工业出版社， 2015:214.
[16]Briggs G，Scheutz M. How Robots Can Affect Human Behavior: Investigating the Effects of Robotic Displays of Protest and Distress［J］. International Journal of Social Robotics， 2014，6(3):343-355.
[17]de Graaf M M A. An Ethical Evaluation of Human-Robot Relationships［J］. International Journal of Social Robotics， 2016，8(4):589-598.
[18]MacDorman K F，Cowley S J. Long-term Relationships as a Benchmark for Robot Personhood［C］∥IEEE International Symposium on Robot & Human Interactive Communication. Hatfield: IEEE， 2006:378-383
[19]Malle B F. Integrating Robot Ethics and Machine Morality: The Study and Design of Moral Competence in Robots［J］. Ethics & Information Technology， 2015，18(4):1-14.
[20]周天策. 共处的“中道”——儿童陪护机器人的伦理风险分析［J］. 自然辩证法研究， 2017，33(4):57-62.