Research on the Optimization of Business Environment Based on Institutional Embeddedness——A Case Study of Liaoning Province

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.03.009

Abstract

Abstract: From the perspective of the “institutional embeddedness”， the enterprise which is the subject of the economic activity is embedded in the government， the market and the social system. Business environment is an institutional environment， which is composed of the government service environment， the market regulation environment and the social infrastructure. The optimization of business environment is conductive to reduce the “uncertainty” of the external environment and institutional transaction costs. As the main responsibility body of the business environment optimization， the government should achieve the efficiency of the government service， the fairness of the market competition and the completeness of the social resources through effective institutional innovation. The paper briefly reviews the optimizing practice of business environment in Liaoning， and analyzes the problems and their institutional causes. Countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to build a service-oriented government to satisfy the enterprises， to improve the market regulation mechanism of fair competition， and to perfect the social support system for gathering resource elements effectively.

Key words: business environment, institutional embeddedness, government, market, society

CLC Number:

D035

ZHANG Guo-yong， LOU Cheng-wu. Research on the Optimization of Business Environment Based on Institutional Embeddedness——A Case Study of Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2018, 20(3): 277-283.

References

[1]卡尔·波兰尼. 大转型:我们时代的政治与经济起源［M］. 冯钢，刘阳，译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社， 2007:39-40.
[2]兰建平，苗文斌. 嵌入性理论研究综述［J］. 技术经济， 2009，28(1):104-108.
[3]Granovetter M，Swedberg R. The Sociology of Economic Life［M］. Boulder:Westview， 1992.
[4]Zukin S，Dimaggio P. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy［M］. New York: Cambridge University Press， 1990.
[5]王宁. 消费行为的制度嵌入性——消费社会学的一个研究纲领［J］. 中山大学学报(社会科学版)， 2008，48(4):140.
[6]龚唯平. 新制度经济学究竟“新”在哪里［J］. 学术研究， 2003(11):12.
[7]邓宏兵，李俊杰，李家成. 中国省域投资环境竞争力动态分析与评估［J］. 生产力研究， 2007(16):77.
[8]李维安，邱艾超，阎大颖. 企业政治关系研究脉络梳理与未来展望［J］. 外国经济与管理， 2010，32(5):48-55.
[9]Hall R E， Jones C I. Why do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?［J］. The Quarterly Journal of Economics， 1999，114(1):83-116.
[10]Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs［R］.Washington D. C.: World Bank Group， 2017:Ⅳ.
[11]俞可平. 论国家治理现代化［M］. 北京:社会科学文献出版社， 2015:117.
[12]胡宁生. 国家治理现代化:政府、市场和社会新型协同互动［J］. 南京社会科学， 2014(1):80-86.
[13]费显政. 资源依赖学派之组织与环境关系理论评介［J］. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2005，58(4):451-455.
[14]道格拉斯·诺斯. 新制度经济学及其发展［J］. 经济社会体制比较， 2002(5):6.
[15]王益谊，席酉民，毕鹏程. 组织环境的不确定性研究综述［J］. 管理工程学报， 2005(1):46-50.
[16]毛强. 制度性交易成本［N］. 学习时报， 2017-12-29(2).
[17]降低制度性交易成本的思考——基于内蒙古、黑龙江的调研报告［J］. 财政科学， 2017(8):22-31.
[18]卢现祥. 转变制度供给方式，降低制度性交易成本［J］. 学术界， 2017(10):36-49.
[19]金太军. 市场失灵、政府失灵与政府干预［J］. 中共福建省委党校学报， 2002(5):54-57.
[20]陈耀. 新一轮东北振兴战略要思考的几个关键问题［J］. 经济纵横， 2017(1):8-12.
[21]North D C. Institutions， Institutional Change， and Economic Performance［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 1990.
[22]杨瑞龙. 论制度供给［J］. 经济研究， 1993(8):51.
[23]安东尼·奥格斯.规制——法律形式与经济学理论［M］. 骆梅英，译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社， 2008:4-6.