Research on Policy Diffusion of Government Purchases of Home-based Care Services from the Perspective of Multiple Logics: An Event History Analysis Based on Provinces' Data of China

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.04.007

Abstract

Abstract: Using the policy diffusion theory and introducing multiple logics， we employ event history analysis to analyze panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019， and examine the organizational behavior logic of the dominant role of government purchases of home-based care services in the diffusion process. It is found that the demand driven by the degree of aging is not obvious in the diffusion process of the government's purchase of home-based care services policy， but is driven by the dual logic of efficiency and legitimacy. Among them， the impacts of regional fiscal capacity， economic conditions， horizontal intergovernmental competition and early release of central administrative signals is the most significant. In addition， the relationship between the age of “the head of local government” and policy adoption is shown as a U-shape.

Key words: policy diffusion; government purchase service; home-based care service; multiple logic

CLC Number:

D035

LYU Xuanru， ZHANG Xiaoyi. Research on Policy Diffusion of Government Purchases of Home-based Care Services from the Perspective of Multiple Logics: An Event History Analysis Based on Provinces' Data of China[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2022, 24(4): 54-64.

References

[1]胡春艳，李蕙娟. 政府购买居家养老服务的问责关系分析及建构——以湖南省为例［J］. 中国行政管理， 2015(11):110-115.
[2]敬乂嘉. 从购买服务到合作治理——政社合作的形态与发展［J］. 中国行政管理， 2014(7):54-59.
[3]Wejnert B. Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: a Conceptual Framework［J］. Annual Review of Sociology， 2002，28(1):297-326.
[4]Berry F S，Berry W D. State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: an Event History Analysis［J］. The American Political Science Review， 1990，84(2):395-415.
[5]Damanpour F. Organizational Innovation: a Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 1991，34(3):555-590.
[6]Karch A. Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research［J］. State Politics & Policy Quarterly， 2007，7(1):54-80.
[7]周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究［J］. 经济研究， 2007(7):36-50.
[8]朱旭峰，张友浪. 创新与扩散: 新型行政审批制度在中国城市的兴起［J］. 管理世界， 2015(10):91-105.
[9]张克. 地方主官异地交流与政策扩散: 以“多规合一”改革为例［J］. 公共行政评论， 2015，8(3):79-102.
[10]朱亚鹏，丁淑娟. 政策属性与中国社会政策创新的扩散研究［J］. 社会学研究， 2016，31(5):88-113.
[11]周雪光，艾云. 多重逻辑下的制度变迁: 一个分析框架［J］. 中国社会科学， 2010(4):132-150.
[12]季飞. 效率与合法性: 我国政策扩散的双重逻辑——基于新高考综合改革的事件史分析［J］. 江汉论坛， 2020(9):62-68.
[13]李智超. 政策试点推广的多重逻辑——基于我国智慧城市试点的分析［J］. 公共管理学报， 2019，16(3):145-156.
[14]Dye T R，Dyer C S. Politics， Economics， and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States［M］. Chicago: Rand McNally， 1966.
[15]盛明科，蔡振华. 公共服务需求管理的历史脉络与现实逻辑——社会主要矛盾的视角［J］. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2018，55(4):23-32.
[16]张军，高远. 官员任期、异地交流与经济增长——来自省级经验的证据［J］. 经济研究， 2007(11):91-103.
[17]朱旭峰，赵慧. 政府间关系视角下的社会政策扩散——以城市低保制度为例(1993—1999)［J］. 中国社会科学， 2016(8):95-116.
[18]韩小凤，赵燕. 我国基本养老保险的区域差异及治理之道［J］. 东岳论丛， 2020，41(4):87-95.
[19]Rogers E M. Diffusion of Innovations［M］. New York: Simon and Schuster， 2010.
[20]Zhou X. The Institutional Logic of Collusion Among Local Governments in China［J］. Modern China， 2010，36(1):47-78.(下转第117页)