Social Engineering of Personal Information Protection Based on the Philosophical Research Paradigm of Social Engineering

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.02.001

Abstract

Abstract: A philosophical research paradigm of social engineering is formulated， which is composed of the levels of ontological problems， value purposes， cognitive laws and method systems， and then the social engineering of personal information protection is constructed based on this research paradigm. At the level of ontological problems of this social engineering， it is pointed out that with the development and application of information technology， the problem of personal information infringement tends to intensify; at the level of value purposes， it is proposed that the values of personal information protection include individual humanistic values and social public welfare values; at the level of cognitive laws， the causes of personal information infringement are analyzed based on the two aspects of mutual integration of scientific and technological object and cognition and values of scientific and technological subject; and at the level of method systems， it discusses the methodological principles of governing from the source， the method system of natural technology， the social technology system of coordinated governance of ethics and laws， and the legal governance system of the combination of private laws and public laws.

Key words: social engineering; philosophical research paradigm; personal information; social engineering of personal information protection

CLC Number:

N031

MAO Muran， DONG Xiaomei. Social Engineering of Personal Information Protection Based on the Philosophical Research Paradigm of Social Engineering[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2023, 25(2): 1-9.

References

[1]田鹏颖. 社会技术和社会工程论［M］. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社， 2011:146-262.
[2]田鹏颖. 从社会工程学到社会工程哲学［J］. 辽东学院学报(社会科学版)， 2014，16(2):1-8.
[3]Asher K. Nietzsche D H. Lawrence and Irrationalism［J］. Neophilologus， 1985，69:1-16.
[4]恩格斯. 反杜林论［M］∥马克思，恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集: 第3卷. 北京: 人民出版社， 1972:323.
[5]乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会:新的现代性之路［M］. 张文杰，何博闻，译. 南京: 译林出版社， 2018.
[6]Warren S，Brandeis L. The Right to Privacy［J］. Harvard Law Review， 1890，4(5):193-220.
[7]Tavani H T，Grodzinsky F S. Cyberstalking， Personal Privacy， and Moral Responsibility［J］. Ethics and Information Technology， 2002，4(2):123-132.
[8]Nissenbaum H. Toward an Approach to Privacy in Public: Challenges of Information Technology［J］. Ethics & Behavior， 1997，7(3):207-219.
[9]维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格，肯尼斯·库克耶. 大数据时代［M］. 盛杨燕，周涛，译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社， 2013:197-198.
[10]Metaverse［EB/OL］. (2022-08-13)［2022-08-15］. https:∥en.jinzhao.wiki/wiki/Metaverse.
[11]Falchuk B，Loeb S，Neff R. The Social Metaverse: Battle for Privacy［J］. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 2018，37(2):52-61.
[12]DeCew J W. Privacy［EB/OL］. (2018-01-18)［2022-01-30］. https:∥plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/privacy/.
[13]Solove D. Understanding Privacy［M］. Cambridge: Harvard University Press， 2008:98，171fn.
[14]Margulis S T. Privacy as a Social Issue and Behavioral Concept［J］. Journal of Social Issues， 2003，59(2):243-261.
[15]California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018［EB/OL］. (2020-01-01)［2022-06-19］. https:∥leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?division=3.&part=4.&lawCode=CIV&title=1.81.5.
[16]叶敏. 论个人信息数据产权的合法取得与民事保护［J］. 中国高校社会科学， 2021(6):73-83.
[17]让-保罗·萨特. 存在与虚无［M］. 陈宣良，译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店， 2014:4.
[18]毛牧然. 论我国出台《个人信息保护法》的法理障碍及其破解［J］. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2020，41(1):59-68.
[19]毛牧然，陈凡. 论技术本身价值负荷的演化模式——兼论对以往技术本身价值负荷理论的发展［J］. 科技进步与对策， 2012，29(19):4-7.
[20]Heidegger M. Question Concerning Technology［M］. trans. Lovitt W. New York: Harper and Row， 1997:17.
[21]Feenberg A. Critical Theory of Technology［M］. New York: Oxford University Press， 1991:5-14.
[22]Graham G. The Internet: a Philosophical Inquiry［M］. London:St Edmunds Burg Press， 1999:103-128.
[23]刘永谋，兰立山. 大数据技术与技治主义［J］. 晋阳学刊， 2018(2):75-80.
[24]Manheim K，Kaplan L. Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy［J］. Yale Journal of Law & Technology， 2019，21:106-188.
[25]Strogatz S. One Giant Step for a Chess-playing Machine［N/OL］. ［2021-12-27］. The New York Times， https:∥www.proquest.com/docview/2160459455?pq-origsite=summon.
[26]Introna L D. Algorithms， Governance， and Governmentality: on Governing Academic Writing［J］. Science Technology and Human Values， 2016，41(1):17-49.
[27]长铗，韩锋. 区块链: 从数字货币到信用社会［M］. 北京: 中信出版集团， 2016:241-242.
[28]赵鹏. 生物医学研究伦理规制的法治化［J］. 中国法学， 2021(6):25-44.
[29]谢尧雯，赵鹏. 科技伦理治理机制及适度法制化发展［J］. 科技进步与对策， 2021，38(16):109-116.
[30]康定山. 谷歌违反《一般数据保护条例》遭法国当局罚款5000万欧元［J］. 互联网天地， 2019(1):59.