Selection of Environmentally Friendly Leaching Materials and Their Remediation Effects on Cd Pollution in Brown Soil

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2024.07.017

Abstract

Abstract:

Biosurfactants have oil and water amphiphilic properties and commonly used for leaching heavy metals in soil. In order to further improve the removal rate of Cd in soil， ethylenediamine tetramethyl phosphonic acid （EDTMPA）， polyamide acid （PAA） and citric acid （CA） were respectively combined with biosurfactants. The leaching characteristics of single leaching agent and composite materials on Cd contaminated soil were investigated by a horizontal experiment method， and the leaching parameters were optimized by response surface methodology. The leaching efficiency and the removal effect of soil Cd pollution between composite leaching and single leaching， different composite materials and leaching sequence were compared. The results showed that the removal rate of Cd by bio?surfactant was <16.69%. The removal rate of heavy metals by EDTMPA and saponin mixed leaching was significantly improved， and the removal rate of Cd was 49.28% higher than that by saponin alone. The optimization results of response surface model showed that the leaching time， mixing ratio， and temperature have a significant impact on the leaching effect， with the order of influence being leaching time>mixing ratio>temperature>pH， and there is interaction between the two factors. The optimum parameters of EDTMPA and saponin mixed leaching are： complex ratio 1.3∶1， pH of 7， temperature of 22 ℃， and leaching time of 240 min. Under these conditions， the removal rate of Cd is 65.16%.

Key words: soil leaching, cadmium, response surface, compound leaching, influencing factor

CLC Number:

X 53

Ying-hua LI, Ji-guo WU, Si-nan LIU, Jie QIAN. Selection of Environmentally Friendly Leaching Materials and Their Remediation Effects on Cd Pollution in Brown Soil[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2024, 45(7): 1047-1056.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1 Influencing factors on Cd removal rate of single washing agent

Fig.2 Effect of the interaction of different factors of EDTMPA on Cd removal rate

Fig.3 Effect of interaction between different factors of PAA on Cd removal rate

Fig.4 Cd removal by chelating agent enhanced biosurfactant

Fig.5 Effect of interaction of different factors on Cd removal by EDTMPA + saponin

References 25

1	丁宁，徐贝妮，彭灿，等.表面活性剂淋洗去除高岭土中镉和铅的研究［J］.环境科学与技术，2017，40（8）：184-188.
	Ding Ning， Xu Bei‑ni， Peng Can，et al.Research on washing of kaolinite to remove cadmium and lead by surfactants［J］.Environmental Science & Technology，2017，40（8）：184-188.
2	平安，魏忠义，李培军，等.有机酸与表面活性剂联合作用对土壤重金属的浸提效果研究［J］.生态环境学报，2011，20（6）：266-273.
	Ping An， Wei Zhong‑yi， Li Pei‑jun，et al.Study on the extractive effect of soil heavy metals with organic acids and surfactants［J］.Ecology and Environmental Sciences，2011，20（6）：266-273.
3	Feng W J， Zhang S R， Zhong Q M，et al.Soil washing remediation of heavy metal from contaminated soil with EDTMP and PAA：properties，optimization，and risk assessment［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials，2020，381（2）：120-127.
4	Wang G Y， Zhang S R， Xu X X，et al.Efficiency of nanoscale zero‑valent iron on the enhanced low molecular weight organic acid removal Pb from contaminated soil［J］.Chemosphere，2014，117（8）：617-624.
5	Guo X F， Wei Z B， Wu Q T，et al.Effect of soil washing with only chelators or combining with ferric chloride on soil heavy metal removal and phyto availability：field experiments［J］.Chemosphere，2016，147（4）：412-419.
6	Hong K J， Tokunaga S， Kajiuchi T.Evaluation of remediation process with plant‑derived biosurfactant for recovery of heavy metals from contaminated soils［J］.Chemosphere，2002，49（4）：379-387.
7	Wei M， Chen J J， Wang X W.Removal of arsenic and cadmium with sequential soil washing techniques using Na₂EDTA，oxalic and phosphoric acid：optimization conditions，removal effectiveness and ecological risks［J］.Chemosphere，2016，156（3）：252-261.
8	方译晨.无患子皂苷水提液与螯合剂联合作用修复镉污染土壤的研究［D］.南宁：广西大学，2019.
	Fang Yi‑chen.Joint effect of sapindus saponins water extract and chelating agent in remediation of cadmium contaminated soil［D］.Nanning：Guangxi University，2019.
9	Xia Z H， Zhang S R， Cao Y R，et al.Remediation of cadmium，lead and zinc in contaminated soil with CETSA and MA/AA［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials，2019，366（15）：177-183.
10	Saeedi M， Li L Y， Grace J R，et al.Desorption and mobility mechanisms of co‑existing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals in clays and clay minerals［J］.Journal of Environmental Management，2018，65（4）：123-131.
11	Han Y， Zhang C X， Zhu L，et al.Effect of alternating electromagnetic field and ultrasonic on CaCO₃ scale inhibitive performance of EDTMPS［J］.Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers，2019，153（7）：152-159.
12	张曙光.有机阻垢缓蚀剂作用机理的理论研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学，2006.
	Zhang Shu‑guang.Theoretical study on the operation mechanism of scale and corrosion inhibitors［D］.Nanjing：Nanjing University of Science & Technology，2006.
13	Zhang C X， Qiao Q Q， Piper J，et al.Assessment of heavy metal pollution from a Fe‑smelting plant in urban river sediments using environmental magnetic and geochemical methods［J］.Environmental Pollution，2011，159（10）：3057-3070.
14	Hu B F， Shao S， Ni H，et al.Current status，spatial features，health risks，and potential driving factors of soil heavy metal pollution in China at province level［J］.Environmental Pollution，2020，266（3）：114-126.
15	张泽志，韩春亮，李成未.响应面法在试验设计与优化中的应用［J］.河南教育学院学报（自然科学版），2011，20（4）：49-56.
	Zhang Ze‑zhi， Han Chun‑liang， Li Cheng‑wei.Application of response surface method in experimental design and optimization［J］.Journal of Henan Institute of Education （Natural Science Edition），2011，20（4）：49-56.
16	Mukhopadhyay S， Mukherjee S， Adnan N F，et al.Ammonium‑based deep eutectic solvents as novel soil washing agent for lead removal［J］.Chemical Engineering Journal，2016，294（3）：316-322.
17	Guan Q Y， Zhao R， Pan N H，et al.Source apportionment of heavy metals in farmland soil，China：comparison of three receptor models［J］.Journal of Cleaner Production，2019，237（10）：177-192.
18	Deng M H， Zhu Y W， Shao K，et al.Metals source apportionment in farmland soil and the prediction of metal transfer in the soil‑rice‑human chain［J］.Journal of Environmental Management，2020，260：92-101.
19	Toth G， Hermann T， Da Silva M R，et al.Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety［J］.Environment International，2016，88（5）：299-309.
20	Shahid M， Xiong T， Castrec‑rouelle M，et al.Water extraction kinetics of metals，arsenic and dissolved organic carbon from industrial contaminated poplar leaves［J］.Journal of Environmental Sciences，2013，12：9-27.
21	王玉军，刘存，周东美.客观地看待我国耕地土壤环境质量的现状——关于《全国土壤污染状况调查公报》中有关问题的讨论和建议［J］.农业环境科学学报，2014，33（8）：95-103.
	Wang Yu‑jun， Liu Cun， Zhou Dong‑mei.A critical view on the status quo of the farmland soil environmental quality in China：discussion and suggestion of relevant issues on Report on the national general survey of soil contamination ［J］.Journal of Agro‑Environment Science，2014，33（8）：95-103.
22	North A E， Sarpong‑Kumankomah S， Bellavie A R，et al.Environmentally relevant concentrations of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents mobilize Cd from humic acid［J］.Journal of Environmental Sciences，2017，57（1）：249-257.
23	Schmidt C K， Brauch H J.Occurrence，fate and relevance of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents in the Rhine Basin，Germany［J］.The Rhine，2005，59（2）：685-691.
24	Tsang D， Yip T， Lo I.Kinetic interactions of EDDS with soils.2.Metal‑EDDS complexes in uncontaminated and metal contaminated soils［J］.Environmental Science & Technology，2009，43（3）：837-842.
25	Zhang W H， Tsang D， Lo I.Removal of Pb and MDF from contaminated soils by EDTA‑ and SDS‑enhanced washing［J］.Chemosphere，2007，66（11）：2025-2034.

[1]	YANG Jin-jin， WANG Zhe-chao， QIAO Li-ping， LI Wei. Analysis of Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Vortex Structure in Rough-Walled Fracture [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2023, 44(5): 697-704.
[2]	PAN Xiong-feng， WANG Meng-yang. Analysis of the Spatial Scale Structure and Influencing Factors of China’s Interprovincial Technology Transfer [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2023, 44(4): 599-608.
[3]	YU Xi， LIU Wen-gang， LIU Wen-bao， PENG Xiang-yu. Roasting and Sulfur Fixation of High-sulfur Coal Gangue by Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2023, 44(2): 265-271.
[4]	JIN Chang-yu， ZHANG Jia-yao， YU Zhong-jie， WANG Qiang. Reliability Analysis of Surface Subsidence Based on Response Surface Methodology [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2023, 44(12): 1734-1742.
[5]	YU Bo-ming， ZHANG Lan-xia， YANG Shuo， LI Shuang. Influence of Organization-Employee Work-Family Boundary Integration Fit on Job Well-Being and Thriving at Work [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2022, 43(3): 448-456.
[6]	LI Ying-hua， WU Ji-guo， QIAN Jie， SUN Jia-ru. Remediation of Lead-Contaminated Soil by Single and Compound Environment-Friendly Leaching Agents [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2022, 43(1): 103-110.
[7]	ZHOU Su-ying， DING Xue-yong， XUE Xiang-xin， YANG He. Efficient Recovery of Highly Concentrated Ammonia Nitrogen from Vanadium-extraction Wastewater with MAP Method [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(6): 789-794.
[8]	XIE Yuan-hua， YANG Dai-en， BAI Bing， ZHU Tong. Study on Excess Sludge Disintegration by High Pressure Jet Impingement Stream [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(12): 1790-1796.
[9]	LI Bo， WANG Zi-sheng， LIANG Chao， WANG Xue-wen. Modification of Discrete Element Contact Parameters of Coal Bulks Based on Rotary Transport Test [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(10): 1435-1443.
[10]	JIANG Bin-hui， JIANG Qi， ZHOU Xing-xing， SHI Yang. Isolation of Cultivable Bacteria in Coal Gangue Spontaneous Combustion Weathered Soil and Phosphate-Solubilizing and Cadmium-Resistant Characteristics [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2020, 41(10): 1438-1444.
[11]	LIU Ying， YU Miao， LIU Yang. Evaluation Model of Bus Route Service Quality Based on Passengers Perceptions [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2019, 40(5): 750-755.
[12]	MA Xiao-gang， CHEN Liang-yu， LI Yang. Optimization of Longevity Technology for Bosh Copper Cooling Stave with Shaped Tubes Based on Response Surface Method [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2019, 40(5): 710-715.
[13]	QI Xi-jing， FAN Chuan-zhao， DENG Li-jie. The Suitability of Underground Space Development in Terms of Subway Station in Shenyang City [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2019, 40(12): 1790-1795.
[14]	LI Qiang， GONG Ya-dong， LIANG Cai-xia， LIU Ming-jun. Research on Milled Surface Roughness of DD5 Single Crystal Superalloy Based on Water-Based MQL Method [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2018, 39(9): 1293-1298.
[15]	QIN Xian-rong， ZHANG Qing， LIU Chao， XU Jian. Finite Element Model Updating of Tower Cranes Based on the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm [J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2018, 39(7): 1017-1021.