How to Realize “Hand-in-hand” Cross-regional Environmental Governance? Based on the Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Multiple-cases

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.03.008

Abstract

Abstract: Cross-regional public environmental issues keep emerging， and the horizontal coordination of local governments in cross-regional environmental governance actions is of great importance. Based on the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis， a theoretical analysis framework is constructed from the perspectives of development difference， political potential， policy environment， organizational carrier and governance capability， and three paths of cross-regional environmental governance are found: “high-level dominant”， “radiation-driven” and “fully supporting”. Among them， political potential is a necessary condition for the horizontal coordinated governance of cross-regional environments. By releasing political pressure and promotion incentives， a binding force is formed that drives collective governance actions. Policy environment and organizational carrier are the sufficient conditions to provide the cooperation space and action carriers required for collective governance actions， and jointly provide constraint rules for the collaborative governance of regional environments. Development difference needs to be combined with specific conditions to affect synergistic effects. Under the interaction of compulsory restraint forces and perfect rules， cross-regional governance entities can work hand in hand to move towards coordinated co-governance. The research results have positive significance for understanding the internal logic of cross-regional environmental and horizontal coordinated governance and exploring a better environment for horizontal coordinated modes.

Key words: cross-regional environmental governance; horizontal coordination; ecological environment; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

CLC Number:

D035

HU Chunyan， ZHOU Fujun. How to Realize “Hand-in-hand” Cross-regional Environmental Governance? Based on the Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Multiple-cases[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2023, 25(3): 67-76.

References

[1]孙涛，温雪梅. 动态演化视角下区域环境治理的府际合作网络研究——以京津冀大气治理为例［J］. 中国行政管理， 2018(5):83-89.
[2]中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议［EB/OL］. (2020-11-03)［2021-07-25］. http:∥www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm.
[3]张成福，李昊城，边晓慧. 跨域治理:模式、机制与困境［J］. 中国行政管理， 2012(3):102-109.
[4]李波，于水. 基于区块链的跨区域环境合作治理研究［J］. 中国环境管理， 2021，13(4):51-56.
[5]Singh R. Questioning the New Public Management［J］. Public Administration Review， 2003，63(1):116-119.
[6]Oi J C. Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China［J］. World Politics， 1992，45(1):99-126.
[7]Lo C W，Fryxell G E，Wong W W. Effective Regulations with Little Effect? the Antecedents of the Perceptions of Environmental Officials on Enforcement Effectiveness in China［J］. Environmental Management， 2006，38(3):388-410.
[8]蔡拓. 全球治理与国家治理: 当代中国两大战略考量［J］. 中国社会科学， 2016(6):5-14.
[9]张立荣，冷向明. 协同学语境下的公共危机管理模式创新探讨［J］. 中国行政管理， 2007(10):100-104.
[10]范如国. 复杂网络结构范型下的社会治理协同创新［J］. 中国社会科学， 2014(4):98-120.
[11]Alison G，Chris A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2008，18(4):543-571.
[12]王欣亮，魏露静，刘飞. 大数据驱动新时代乡村治理的路径建构［J］. 中国行政管理， 2018(11):50-55.
[13]周明，许珂. 组织吸纳社会: 对社会治理共同体作用形态的一种解释［J］. 求实， 2022(2):37-50.
[14]Fountain J E. 论电子政府对政治制度的影响［J］. 于跃，王斯妤，译. 电子政务， 2016(1):103-114.
[15]彭兰. 自组织与网络治理理论视角下的互联网治理［J］. 社会科学战线， 2017(4):168-175.
[16]韩兆柱. 京津冀生态治理的府际合作路径研究——以网络化治理为视角［J］. 人民论坛·学术前沿， 2018(18):75-85.
[17]李月起. 新发展理念下成渝城市群府际合作治理模式探索［J］. 中国行政管理， 2018(5):153-155.
[18]王超奕. 跨区域绿色治理府际合作动力机制研究［J］. 山东社会科学， 2020(6):124-129.
[19]刘俸奇，储德银，姜春娜. 财政透明、公共支出结构与地方政府治理能力［J］. 经济学动态， 2021(4):107-123.
[20]贺东航，孔繁斌. 中国公共政策执行中的政治势能——基于近20年农村林改政策的分析［J］. 中国社会科学， 2019(4):4-25.
[21]周凌一. 纵向干预何以推动地方协作治理?——以长三角区域环境协作治理为例［J］. 公共行政评论， 2020，13(4):90-107.
[22]赵晨光. 我国跨域公共危机治理的政策碎片化问题研究——基于整体性治理的视角［J］. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版)， 2016，37(2):38-41.
[23]锁利铭，李雪. 从“单一边界”到“多重边界”的区域公共事务治理——基于对长三角大气污染防治合作的观察［J］. 中国行政管理， 2021(2):92-100.
[24]刘瑾，刘伟. 近十年来国内学界的群体性事件研究: 回顾与反思［J］. 甘肃行政学院学报， 2017(5):55-68.
[25]周伟. 合作型环境治理:跨域生态环境治理中的地方政府合作［J］. 青海社会科学， 2020(2):76-83.
[26]杜运周，贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路［J］. 管理世界， 2017(6):155-167.
[27]李磊，马韶君，郑依琳. 府际关系视角下新兴产业合作的组态路径——基于模糊集的定性比较分析［J］. 城市问题， 2021(3):67-74.
[28]Gunton T I. The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Planning in Resource and Environmental Management［J］. Environments， 2003，31(2):5-20.
[29]贺东航，孔繁斌. 重大公共政策“政治势能”优劣利弊分析——兼论“政治势能”研究的拓展［J］. 公共管理与政策评论， 2020，9(4):52-59.
[30]卢青，郭鑫鑫，郑石明. 政府环境治理能力: 影响因素及其评价体系［J］. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报， 2020，49(2):87-95.［31］周雪光. 权威体制与有效治理: 当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑［J］. 开放时代， 2011(10):67-85.